Do you make Chiefs content?

[ChiefsFanatic]

So, this is my old man, get off my lawn moment.

I like the Chiefs. I like sports. I can read. I have the internet. Sometimes I read what's on the internet, like many other people.

I have Chiefs content pushed at me on every social media app, plus I have a hub on my phone that pushes suggested content.

I will GLADLY read stories about my all-time favorite football team, the Kansas City Chiefs, and I will GLADLY watch random YouTube videos about that same team.

UNLESS you title your article or video with garbage clickbait titles like "Rising Chiefs Star Builds Connection With Mahomes" and the "rising star" is Justyn Ross, who had two catches from Mahomes in camp.

If they do that, I hate them personally (not really, but come on) and I immediately block that page, channel, blog, etc. from ever appearing on my feed again.

I don't understand why anyone clicks on clickbait anymore.

Or, another thing that has been pissing me TF off lately is pages that make 20 damn "articles" out of one interview, and presenting each as if they are actually new info or content.

Travis Kelce gives an interview on a podcast, and I start seeing clickbait headlines like "Travis Kelce Makes Bold Statement About Harrison Butker" and the "statement" came from an answer he gave saying he likes Butker as a person and teammate. That's all he said, but it was a "bold" statement. And they use that same basic headline for anything and everything someone said in an interview with someone else.

In the next sentence Kelce said he has never had a problem with any teammate with the Chiefs, and the "article" headline was "Did Travis Kelce Have Issues With College Teammates" but that's not what he said. I assume that they are just crap that some douche is creating with an AI macro or some BS, but that douche needs a nut punch or a clam slap.

However, any Chiefs "source" that ends up in my feed, that is honest, even if the content is poorly written or something that I already knew, etc. I follow them, or subscribe, etc.

It's probably only me, but I am high AF, and just saw like 20 of these BS articles in a row on the aggregator, and it's just FN annoying.

TL;DR: I hate clickbait.

[Straight, No Chaser]

Originally Posted by ChiefsFanatic

So, this is my old man, get off my lawn moment.

I like the Chiefs. I like sports. I can read. I have the internet. Sometimes I read what's on the internet, like many other people.

I have Chiefs content pushed at me on every social media app, plus I have a hub on my phone that pushes suggested content.

I will GLADLY read stories about my all-time favorite football team, the Kansas City Chiefs, and I will GLADLY watch random YouTube videos about that same team.

UNLESS you title your article or video with garbage clickbait titles like "Rising Chiefs Star Builds Connection With Mahomes" and the "rising star" is Justyn Ross, who had two catches from Mahomes in camp.

If they do that, I hate them personally (not really, but come on) and I immediately block that page, channel, blog, etc. from ever appearing on my feed again.

I don't understand why anyone clicks on clickbait anymore.

Or, another thing that has been pissing me TF off lately is pages that make 20 damn "articles" out of one interview, and presenting each as if they are actually new info or content.

Travis Kelce gives an interview on a podcast, and I start seeing clickbait headlines like "Travis Kelce Makes Bold Statement About Harrison Butker" and the "statement" came from an answer he gave saying he likes Butker as a person and teammate. That's all he said, but it was a "bold" statement. And they use that same basic headline for anything and everything someone said in an interview with someone else.

In the next sentence Kelce said he has never had a problem with any teammate with the Chiefs, and the "article" headline was "Did Travis Kelce Have Issues With College Teammates" but that's not what he said. I assume that they are just crap that some douche is creating with an AI macro or some BS, but that douche needs a nut punch or a clam slap.

However, any Chiefs "source" that ends up in my feed, that is honest, even if the content is poorly written or something that I already knew, etc. I follow them, or subscribe, etc.

It's probably only me, but I am high AF, and just saw like 20 of these BS articles in a row on the aggregator, and it's just FN annoying.

TL;DR: I hate clickbait.

Thank you for saying all of that. It saves me the time doing it.

I have to choose a few sources I trust and like the sources. Has to be timely. It’s tempting to click but finding out it’s a quote out of context from two weeks ago leaves me limp. Well, sounds like I’m getting stuff like I did 10 years ago.

[Jewish Rabbi]

Originally Posted by ChiefsFanatic

So, this is my old man, get off my lawn moment.

I like the Chiefs. I like sports. I can read. I have the internet. Sometimes I read what's on the internet, like many other people.

I have Chiefs content pushed at me on every social media app, plus I have a hub on my phone that pushes suggested content.

I will GLADLY read stories about my all-time favorite football team, the Kansas City Chiefs, and I will GLADLY watch random YouTube videos about that same team.

UNLESS you title your article or video with garbage clickbait titles like "Rising Chiefs Star Builds Connection With Mahomes" and the "rising star" is Justyn Ross, who had two catches from Mahomes in camp.

If they do that, I hate them personally (not really, but come on) and I immediately block that page, channel, blog, etc. from ever appearing on my feed again.

I don't understand why anyone clicks on clickbait anymore.

Or, another thing that has been pissing me TF off lately is pages that make 20 damn "articles" out of one interview, and presenting each as if they are actually new info or content.

Travis Kelce gives an interview on a podcast, and I start seeing clickbait headlines like "Travis Kelce Makes Bold Statement About Harrison Butker" and the "statement" came from an answer he gave saying he likes Butker as a person and teammate. That's all he said, but it was a "bold" statement. And they use that same basic headline for anything and everything someone said in an interview with someone else.

In the next sentence Kelce said he has never had a problem with any teammate with the Chiefs, and the "article" headline was "Did Travis Kelce Have Issues With College Teammates" but that's not what he said. I assume that they are just crap that some douche is creating with an AI macro or some BS, but that douche needs a nut punch or a clam slap.

However, any Chiefs "source" that ends up in my feed, that is honest, even if the content is poorly written or something that I already knew, etc. I follow them, or subscribe, etc.

It's probably only me, but I am high AF, and just saw like 20 of these BS articles in a row on the aggregator, and it's just FN annoying.

TL;DR: I hate clickbait.

I’m actually Cole on YouTube. Let’s ride.

[smithandrew051]

I make Chief inspired OnlyFans content.

[Jewish Rabbi]

Originally Posted by smithandrew051

I make Chief inspired OnlyFans content.

Will this Chiefs themed Santa ornament fit ENTIRELY in my ass? Click here to find out!!!

[RedinTexas]

Originally Posted by Jewish Rabbi

Will this Chiefs themed Santa ornament fit ENTIRELY in my ass? Click here to find out!!!

Is it an actual arrowhead? I might watch.

[George Liquor]

Does shitposting on a Chiefs related fan board count?

[Jewish Rabbi]

Originally Posted by RedinTexas

Is it an actual arrowhead? I might watch.

CLICK HERE TO FIND OUT BUD!!!

[smithandrew051]

Originally Posted by Jewish Rabbi

Will this Chiefs themed Santa ornament fit ENTIRELY in my ass? Click here to find out!!!

I dress up as Chiefsaholic and my wife is the sexy bank teller

[Jewish Rabbi]

Originally Posted by smithandrew051

I dress up as Chiefsaholic and my wife is the sexy bank teller

Wish I was ur wife

[lewdog]

Only in my pants.

[ChiliConCarnage]

Originally Posted by George Liquor

Does shitposting on a Chiefs related fan board count?

Yurp. Making "content" right now.

[Bob Dole]

Originally Posted by Straight, No Chaser

Thank you for saying all of that. It saves me the time doing it.

I have to choose a few sources I trust and like the sources. Has to be timely. It’s tempting to click but finding out it’s a quote out of context from two weeks ago leaves me limp. Well, sounds like I’m getting stuff like I did 10 years ago.

Doesn't fit here, bur since you mentioned Travis... Watching a Hodge Twins podcast this morning and an NFL player who knows Kelce said he got $20 million for his vaccine promo and is "apolitical".

[JimNasium]

Originally Posted by Jewish Rabbi

I’m actually Cole on YouTube. Let’s ride.

Came here to post this. Do you like my beard and my outraged look in my YouTube teasers?

[Rain Man]

I don't understand some of the financial models of putting up "content". I guess people get garbage-y ads attached to their "content", and they make money when people click the garbage-y ads for some reason. So everyone and their ferret uses AI now to write garbage-y "content" in an effort to get people to click garbage-y ads in their garbage-y content.

That's a house of cards, and at some point it's going to collapse. But I think on the way down, more and more people produce garbage-y content chasing the dwindling and diluted payments for getting people to produce garbage-y ads. And then the introduction of AI lets people produce garbage-y content with almost no effort.

The clear answer here is to not click on garbage-y content and definitely don't click on garbage-y ads. If we can show a little willpower against the clickbait, at some point the model will break down. But I think the key question is what will happen to the internet before that happens. It appears that we're headed toward a future where the internet is worthless, because real information and thought is going to be a smaller and smaller proportion of content. In two years, you'll open your browser and 99.9999 percent of what comes up in searches and on home pages will be utterly useless. And at that point maybe we'll start subscribing to hard copy newspapers and magazines again.

I really wish I could block sites from showing up in google searches or on my home page. If a place produces garbage or is just a clickbait farm, like Ranker or Pinterest or Barron's, I want my computer to pretend that they don't exist. But I know that google won't do that, because they sell garbage-y ads on those garbage-y sites.