|
|
03-30-2022, 11:39 AM | #2 |
Pepsi, cheeburger, chip
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Location: Location
|
Hypothetically, if small school guys Watson and Moore are there at 50, hands down for me it’s Watson. Moore is fast straight-line (4.41) but his issue is his 3 cone, shuttle and height were all “very poor”.
|
Posts: 1,239
|
03-30-2022, 01:52 PM | #3 | |
Sauntering Vaguely Downwards
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Columbia, Mo
|
Quote:
I don't get this at all. I wouldn't take this dude in the 2nd, let alone the freakin' first. I'd take Calvin Austin over Moore 100 times out of 100. There is absolutely nothing to suggest this guy is a legitimate target for the Chiefs in the 1st and in all likelihood not even the 2nd. |
|
Posts: 60,757
|
2 0 |
03-30-2022, 02:16 PM | #4 |
Pepsi, cheeburger, chip
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Location: Location
|
I’m there as well.
|
Posts: 1,239
|
03-30-2022, 02:32 PM | #5 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2021
|
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 3,613
|
04-21-2022, 09:50 AM | #6 | |
Needs more middle fingers
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Diego
|
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 64,547
|
04-21-2022, 02:11 PM | #7 | |
Sauntering Vaguely Downwards
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Columbia, Mo
|
Quote:
A lot. With the late second? Sure. But man, I just don't see what some of y'all are seeing. I don't see a guy who's big enough to be the X we want long-term, quick enough to be a dynamic player in the slot or large enough to be a red-zone threat. I see a really REALLY fungible player here with no real standout skills. He's...fine. He's a low ceiling, relatively high floor, depth WR on a good team. I just don't really understand what I'm missing with him. But ultimately I think that horse has been beaten to death so I guess we just let it play out. |
|
Posts: 60,757
|
|
|