|
|
07-01-2020, 04:12 PM | #2 | |
Sauntering Vaguely Downwards
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Columbia, Mo
|
Quote:
Your position is that the Chiefs should continue to pay 4 different guys more than they're worth so that Chris Jones can take 75% of what HE'S worth on the open market? You're essentially calling Chris Jones greedy for being unwilling to subsidize his teammates paychecks. In effect, JONES is the one that is overpaying for those guys because it's money he'd be getting but/for their inflated deals. And that's...okay? You're cool with calling Jones greedy because he sees this team keeping guys around who aren't worth their checks while simultaneously telling him they aren't going to pay him what he'd otherwise be capable of earning? That's odd... |
|
Posts: 60,757
|
07-01-2020, 04:32 PM | #3 | |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Aug 2005
|
Quote:
When did I say Jones was greedy? First, you say- I am "essentially" calling him greedy- then you double down on that and say I am "cool with it" . It is not My position- this is what the Chiefs have decided to do. I only disagreed when you said Veech is shortsighted wanting to win another SB with this loaded team that has great chemistry instead of breaking them up for cap relief. BTW I have always been on the Keep Jones bandwagon- but think it would be a horrible move if he holds out. |
|
Posts: 43,200
|
|
|