|
|
03-25-2019, 02:34 PM | #2 | |
Sauntering Vaguely Downwards
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Columbia, Mo
|
Quote:
Now if I were looking at a board with Lindstrom as the top of the position on the IOL and somehow my BPA, I'd probably do it. But I think we're poopooing the responsibilities of a C a bit here. That's a toooouuuuugh position to play, especially in this system and with a young QB under center witha chance to build a half-decade or more of rapport there, I don't see C as any 'worse' a position to take as just about anything being suggested in the alternative. It's just a less sexy one. |
|
Posts: 60,721
|
03-25-2019, 02:36 PM | #3 | |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Jul 2009
|
Quote:
It would depend to me on if they have guys rated similarly. If they truly believe the end of the first is gonna be similar to the back of the 2nd in terms of who they can get, go trade that pick for Clowney or Ramsey and sign them. It's a way to get blue chippers which you need (unless your New England and we ain't New England) |
|
Posts: 81,418
|
03-25-2019, 02:39 PM | #4 |
Colorado Chief Fan
Join Date: Feb 2006
|
You guys are great and I appreciate these conversations.
I dont watch college ball so I have to learn the entire draft from February to April. Thanks for the help. Chiefs will pick someone none of us expect, like usual. |
Posts: 5,589
|
|
|