|
|
View Poll Results: Non-QB Unit of the Week. Cast your ballot online. | |||
Running backs | 1 | 2.04% | |
Receivers (WR/TE) | 31 | 63.27% | |
Offensive Line | 6 | 12.24% | |
Special Teams (all facets) | 3 | 6.12% | |
Defensive backs | 3 | 6.12% | |
Linebackers | 0 | 0% | |
Defensive line | 3 | 6.12% | |
Gosh, I can't decide. | 2 | 4.08% | |
Voters: 49. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Yesterday, 04:35 PM | #2 |
NFL's #1 Ermines Fan
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: My house
|
I thought the DBs were strong, and I almost voted for the DL until I remembered Worthy and Rice galloping through the opposing secondary.
I'm voting receivers. |
Posts: 142,448
|
Yesterday, 04:36 PM | #3 |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Nov 2018
|
Gotta be the offensive line…. Creed, Kelce, Kingsley were all beasting yesterday
|
Posts: 21,466
|
Yesterday, 04:36 PM | #4 |
Life is changing..
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: NW Missouri
|
WR/TE
|
Posts: 40,056
|
Yesterday, 04:40 PM | #5 |
Kind of a mod
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Donkey Land
|
It's between WRs/TEs and DBs to me. I went with WRs, though because, while Lamar didn't beat them much, he did manage to beat them in some pretty key situations.
|
Posts: 52,224
|
Yesterday, 04:41 PM | #6 |
I Like The Kansas City Chiefs
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Shawnee, KS
|
I compared it to my expectations coming into the game and picked DBs.
A couple **** ups but overall solid stuff. |
Posts: 26,842
|
Yesterday, 04:41 PM | #7 |
Kind of a mod
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Donkey Land
|
I'm not worried about them - the Ravens pass rush is legit - but Patrick made them look better than they were. He was moving around in the pocket all night to avoid the pressure.
|
Posts: 52,224
|
Yesterday, 04:42 PM | #8 |
I Like The Kansas City Chiefs
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Shawnee, KS
|
The couple bad drops from receivers made the difference for me
|
Posts: 26,842
|
Yesterday, 04:49 PM | #9 |
YOU take YOUR seat
Join Date: Nov 2007
|
Receivers for sure, even with a couple of drops. Rice was dominating and Worthy had a hell of a debut!
DB's would have been my other choice, they did a pretty great job overall. |
Posts: 34,294
|
Yesterday, 04:52 PM | #10 |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Mar 2007
|
OL edges the WRs, although Rice and Worthy were great. A rookie tackle and Thuney coming back from a major injury against a great DL, they did their job.
|
Posts: 22,406
|
Yesterday, 04:54 PM | #11 |
...
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Kansas City, MO
|
Was between WRs/TEs and DBs. Going WRs/TEs because of the stark contrast to last year's opener. Having a good night and pretty much putting to bed that epic saga.
|
Posts: 28,677
|
Yesterday, 05:06 PM | #12 |
Spiraling down the Drain
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Dante's Ninth Circle
|
OL
|
Posts: 32,033
|
Today, 12:40 AM | #13 |
Supporter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Highlandville, MO
|
DB's did okay. But let's not forget that they were defending passes from a running back all night. I have to go with receivers.
|
Posts: 12,678
|
Today, 03:46 AM | #14 |
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2021
|
WR/TEs. I don't think the OL was at the same level and the WRs and TEs with Pat were working with limited time.
|
Posts: 3,743
|
Today, 04:06 AM | #15 |
Politically Incorrect
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
|
So I can't vote for Nick Bolton?
|
Posts: 51,613
|
|
|