|
|
05-02-2021, 09:42 AM | #2 | |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Oct 2007
|
Quote:
But the issue is people like Direckshun are so concerned with positional value that they overlook real value. Bolton and Humphrey were consensus top 40-50 guys at the very least that some had going in the 1st round. To get that at 58 and 63 IS value. Do the Chiefs not have a need at those positions? If they work out, are the Chiefs not getting value having a starting C and MLB on rookie deals as opposed to paying market value at those positions to fill a need in free agency? Value is value. |
|
Posts: 48,840
|
1 0 |
05-02-2021, 11:29 AM | #3 | |
Starter
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Phoenix, AZ
|
Quote:
Compounding the LB/LB on back-to-back years in the top 16, they did the same thing previously with QB/QB. And 2017 was Hassan Reddick, another LB (really a DE they played out off position...). Obviously the switch to Murray from Rosen was the right move, but they've had questionable positional decision making 5 years straight related to their 1st round picks. That statement is made agnostic of the actual players success. |
|
Posts: 792
|
|
|