|
|
04-05-2022, 02:20 PM | #2 | |
M-I-Z-Z-O-U
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Kansas City
|
Quote:
The Texans are an intriguing partner here. Here's a fun concept: Texans get: 29, 30, and 62 Chiefs get: 13, 37 That works out pretty well in value. You're giving up a 2nd, but still have 2 of them and still get 3 picks in the top 50 of this draft. I'm not sure 13 is high enough to be assured of Johnson, though. |
|
Posts: 21,139
|
1 0 |
04-05-2022, 02:24 PM | #3 | |
'Tis my eye!
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Chiefsplanet
|
Quote:
I actually like this idea. |
|
Posts: 100,022
|
04-05-2022, 02:26 PM | #4 | |
M-I-Z-Z-O-U
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Kansas City
|
Quote:
Not sexy. But pretty good returns. |
|
Posts: 21,139
|
04-05-2022, 02:35 PM | #5 | |
'Tis my eye!
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Chiefsplanet
|
Quote:
I'll be honest - about the only thing I'm against at this point is trading up for Williams or Ojabo. It's one thing to take a guy with an injury. It's another thing altogether to trade up for that... |
|
Posts: 100,022
|
04-05-2022, 02:24 PM | #6 | |
Most Valuable Villain
Join Date: Dec 2006
|
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 92,208
|
04-05-2022, 02:29 PM | #7 | |
M-I-Z-Z-O-U
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Kansas City
|
Quote:
And yeah, looking at drafttek, it looks like it need to include either 50 instead of 62 or include 62 and another pick. That runs off the Johnson chart. |
|
Posts: 21,139
|
04-05-2022, 02:32 PM | #8 | |
Most Valuable Villain
Join Date: Dec 2006
|
Quote:
Chiefs giving up 483. Houston giving up (with #37) 498. I was using the Johnson model for my earlier post. |
|
Posts: 92,208
|
04-05-2022, 02:59 PM | #9 |
M-I-Z-Z-O-U
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Kansas City
|
|
Posts: 21,139
|
04-23-2022, 10:31 AM | #10 | |
I’m a Mahomo!
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Mid-Missouri
|
Quote:
Probably have to give them 135 & get back their 183 to complete it. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
Posts: 54,038
|
|
|