|
|
02-24-2024, 02:39 PM | #2 |
Generational Player
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Honolulu
|
|
Posts: 2,222
|
02-24-2024, 02:49 PM | #3 |
MVP
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Michigan
|
No ****ing way is it worth giving up that much capital for a rookie WR.
If I'm giving all that up, I'd just offer it to Minnesota for Jefferson and pay the guy too. At least I know I'm getting a superstar. |
Posts: 12,681
|
2 0 |
02-24-2024, 02:51 PM | #4 | |
Generational Player
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Honolulu
|
Quote:
1.Jefferson not available 2. Jefferson would require a max contract. Move up for Nabers and we would have a #1 WR on a cost controlled contract for several years. That's valuable. |
|
Posts: 2,222
|
02-24-2024, 02:57 PM | #5 | |
MVP
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Michigan
|
Quote:
There's also no guarantee Nabers is going to be great and certainly might not be worth the cost of acquisition in comparison to just getting someone like Franklin. It's just not a worthwhile investment in capital. WR is not a pillar position. I just can't support going balls-deep on it unless I know I'm getting a generational talent. QB, Pass Rusher, Left Tackle... That's about it for me. |
|
Posts: 12,681
|
02-24-2024, 03:29 PM | #6 | |
Generational Player
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Honolulu
|
Quote:
With Spags I don't think we need a franchise pass-rusher to remain near the top ten either if we kept Sneed/McDuffie. Left Tackle isn't as valuable to me in the current NFL because of the QB we have. Maybe if we had a statue pocket passer but Mahomes is a modern QB. So WR would be something I would want because the current Chiefs SB Championships all had a 1 or 2 HOF pass-catchers. Veach traded one and the other is almost aged out. So moving forward if Nabers projects as a elite #1 I go get him at 9. I don't do the move to top 5 as that is another level of expense and I would be out at a certain point. |
|
Posts: 2,222
|
02-24-2024, 06:31 PM | #7 | |
MVP
Join Date: Oct 2012
|
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 10,860
|
|
|