|
|
View Poll Results: Who would win in a fight between Bruce Lee and Mike Tyson in his prime? | |||
Bruce Lee | 264 | 62.41% | |
Mike Tyson | 159 | 37.59% | |
Voters: 423. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
01-26-2016, 03:38 PM | #781 |
Quit your bullshit
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Bored of winning
|
|
Posts: 41,870
|
01-26-2016, 03:38 PM | #782 |
Ultrabanned
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Northland
|
Think Bruce could take down Rousey?
|
Posts: 42,579
|
01-26-2016, 04:02 PM | #783 |
ON CP YOU’RE SOMEBODY’S BITCH!
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Da SEI
|
|
Posts: 13,270
|
01-26-2016, 04:11 PM | #784 | |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Aug 2005
|
Quote:
Greatest of all time-that is laughable- so he could of beat Joe Lewis, Ali, Marciano, or how about Foreman in his prime? Not a chance. Lee was not just an actor but the founder of Jeet Kune Do. He was also the Godfather of MMA according to Dana White and many others. Obviously you are in love with Tyson's highlight reel of uppercuts to flabby and over the hill "fighters" and don't put much stock in martial arts. Tommy Morrison had a much better record and used to destroy the same kind of guys Tyson did. So by your measurement -Tommy the Duke would win against the "actor" and basically any heavyweight boxer-because of size advantage. You are right a smaller guy has Never beat a bigger guy-ever. Over the years I have seen many smaller little guys that looked like nothing special- beat the shit out of guys twice their size. And these are just your run of the mill bar fights-not the greatest martial artist of all time. In a controlled boxing match-I would give Tyson an edge -but a cage fight, anything goes, to the death- Lee would rip his eyes out in the first 1/2 second of the fight. |
|
Posts: 43,200
|
01-26-2016, 04:16 PM | #785 |
Mostly Ignored
Join Date: Jul 2013
|
Hahahahahahahaha....rip his eyes out in the first half second of the fight.
That's gold. |
Posts: 18,096
|
01-26-2016, 04:18 PM | #786 |
Mostly Ignored
Join Date: Jul 2013
|
It's scary that the U.S government allows some of you rubes to vote.
|
Posts: 18,096
|
01-26-2016, 04:21 PM | #787 | |
left blank intentionally
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Belize Nuts
|
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 32,201
|
01-26-2016, 04:28 PM | #788 | |
Quit your bullshit
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Bored of winning
|
Quote:
Voted that Rhonda Rousey would beat Floyd Mayweather |
|
Posts: 41,870
|
01-26-2016, 04:31 PM | #789 |
best in the biz
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Under Pressure
|
Lee's strikes were too quick to defend.
|
Posts: 72,726
|
01-26-2016, 04:36 PM | #790 |
Quit your bullshit
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Bored of winning
|
|
Posts: 41,870
|
01-26-2016, 04:41 PM | #791 | |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Aug 2008
|
Quote:
It's hard to say who'd win because they're two totally different fighters. But people here diminishing Lee to some Jet LI or Jackie Chan type movie star is just silly. |
|
Posts: 49,588
|
01-26-2016, 04:48 PM | #792 | |
Sauntering Vaguely Downwards
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Columbia, Mo
|
Quote:
At some point, mass wins. If you're a lumbering brute, that mass can be neutralized and even used against you. But when you have the quickness and explosion that Tyson had, not to mention the footwork he had when D'amato was still training him, he'd absolutely wreck Lee. This isn't speed vs. power - it's speed vs. speed AND power. Tyson had 90 lbs and a major reach advantage on Lee. He was a technically skilled fighter as well. Lee was a powerful striker for a 135 lb man, but he was nothing compared to the guys that Tyson fought and shrugged off blows from. |
|
Posts: 62,880
|
01-26-2016, 04:50 PM | #793 | |
Mostly Ignored
Join Date: Jul 2013
|
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 18,096
|
01-26-2016, 04:52 PM | #794 |
Ultrabanned
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Northland
|
|
Posts: 42,579
|
01-26-2016, 04:52 PM | #795 | |
Quit your bullshit
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Bored of winning
|
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 41,870
|
|
|