|
05-02-2021, 10:20 AM | #46 | |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Jul 2009
|
Quote:
In the end, it will all come down to him. If he shows he can run and play 3 downs, it was a great pick and it was wrong for him to fall. If he ends up a 2 down Reggie Ragland type guy, yeah he fell for a reason |
|
Posts: 82,314
|
05-02-2021, 10:34 AM | #47 | |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Oct 2007
|
Quote:
We don’t know. I do know that he was a consensus top 40-50 guy that some even had in the 1st. That’s value at 58. And he’s so much better than Ragland. He’s a 3 down player even if he’s not a stud in coverage. He’s capable. |
|
Posts: 50,644
|
05-02-2021, 10:36 AM | #48 | |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Jul 2009
|
Quote:
Legit 3 down linebackers don’t tend to fall if that’s what the league thinks they are. I’m hoping he’s more devin bush jr than the league seems to think |
|
Posts: 82,314
|
05-02-2021, 10:37 AM | #49 | |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Oct 2007
|
Quote:
You went form this: To that. So ****ing dumb. |
|
Posts: 50,644
|
05-02-2021, 10:38 AM | #50 |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Jul 2009
|
|
Posts: 82,314
|
05-02-2021, 10:39 AM | #51 |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Jul 2009
|
|
Posts: 82,314
|
05-02-2021, 10:40 AM | #52 |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Jul 2009
|
I’m not disparaging him comparing him to Ragland as a prospect. I’m not saying that’s what he’ll become.
I’m saying they had similar issues coming out of college and things they needed to do at the next level. Hopefully Bolton can do it. |
Posts: 82,314
|
05-02-2021, 10:41 AM | #53 | |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Oct 2007
|
Quote:
There’s a lot more reason to believe Bolton can be a 3 down LB than Ragland. Anybody that thinks otherwise is clueless or hasn’t really watched Bolton’s tape. Even PFF had a very good grade on Bolton in terms of coverage. He’s not great at it, but he’s absolutely capable. He also has ball skills and plays a lot faster/quicker than Ragland. |
|
Posts: 50,644
|
05-02-2021, 10:44 AM | #54 | |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Oct 2007
|
Quote:
I’m all ears... |
|
Posts: 50,644
|
05-02-2021, 10:45 AM | #55 | |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Jul 2009
|
Quote:
Bolton has similar question marks and it likely pushed him down the board a little. I’m not saying he can’t do it. Hopefully he can. |
|
Posts: 82,314
|
05-02-2021, 10:47 AM | #56 | |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Jul 2009
|
Quote:
Based on what I’ve read atleast. I didn’t so much watching on this class either way, don’t really have time. So you’re probably right. You spend way more time on this than I do. Have you not ever had a guy you liked a lot early that you eventually liked less? Maybe that’s just me |
|
Posts: 82,314
|
1 0 |
05-02-2021, 10:49 AM | #57 | |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Jul 2009
|
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 82,314
|
1 0 |
05-02-2021, 10:52 AM | #58 |
sorta mod-ish
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: KC North
|
We have more depth across the board right now at nearly every position than we have had in years, maybe excluding corner and receiver, and this team has been to three AFCCG's and two Super Bowls in a row. Not only do I trust in Veach and his guys to do their due diligence researching who to bring into the fold, I trust our positional coaches and coordinators to maximize these guys' abilities and when and where to use them.
Did we reach with a couple of picks when we should have taken someone else? Sure, quite probably. Am I concerned about it? Not in the least. I'm stoked about these picks, every one of them. Even Kaindoh who can start on special teams and learn from Okafor, Taco, Clark, and Danna. |
Posts: 103,223
|
05-02-2021, 10:54 AM | #59 | |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Oct 2007
|
Quote:
I’m just giving you a hard time though. |
|
Posts: 50,644
|
05-02-2021, 11:27 AM | #60 |
MVP
Join Date: May 2001
Location: midtown KC
|
Oh man. Where to start with this post?
Let's start here: 1)99% of the mock drafts and 'expert analysis' bullshit we see is based on rumors and guesses by people who are not and never have been NFL scouts. Most of them are no more qualified than you or I to run an NFL draft room; and you or I are absolutely NOT qualified just because we read what these guys say and watch some YouTube videos. 2) The concept of positional value above all else ignores CONTEXT. Judging an individual draft by that that concept ignores so many variables that are really important like: A)team needs, which include cap situations regarding veterans going forward, the depth chart and whether this position is likely to see the field any time soon B)Scheme fit- sure that player may be EDGE RUSHER #6, which is excellent value in the late 2nd round, but he's 245 lbs. and best suited as a 3-4 OLB, and is likely to ONLY be successful as a situational pass rusher in a 4-3 base/heavy nickel like we run here. So no, he's not as valuable as a guy who may play 60 snaps plus a game at a less 'premier' position of NEED. 3)Your premise assumes that there is a huge difference between, say, WR #8 and WR #16. The reality is, because of scheme fit, differences of opinion in scouts rankings, and such WE have no earthly idea who WR #8 even is to any specific team, and the difference between WR #8 and #16 may be a big difference or very little. A lot of times, guys are bunched in very similar talent groups and you don't know what variables make the fit a good one or not. Maybe WR #8 is faster, but he's dumb as a rock and unlikely to be able to digest an Andy Reid playbook. WR #16 is super smart and a better route runner which allows him to play 'quicker' than his 40 time but he played in a dumbed down offense in college so you and I don't know that, but the scouts do and he's a better fit actually than WR #8. So do you reach for WR #16? You could, and then everybody talks about how stupid you are, because that guy has a fourth round grade, and this guy you passed over was a clear second round talent, yadda yadda yadda. So you wait and you take him where it makes sense to, and in the meantime- 4) KC is picking at the back end of every round. IF they stay with the so-called 'higher value, premier positions' they will forever be drafting lesser talent. This is a formula for a declining team. The system is literally set up that way-to encourage parity and discourage dynasties. If you keep your board open to any position that is a scheme and need fit you can get elite players albeit at 'less valued positions'. Having young, cost controlled elite talent is the key to keeping this SB train running as long as we can with Mahomes. You fill in what you need to in free agency, but the draft is still the foundation. So, you take WR #8 in the second round, and end up with IOL #30 in round 6 and hope he can be a good starting Center in a couple of seasons because positional value! .This is how you end up with Reiter and Wylie. But WR#16 was actually an equally good fit for the team and you could wait and grab him in the 4th because he's a really SPECIFIC good fit for this offense more so than some others and your scouts just love him. So you take the LB and the OC in the second because they fit perfect and you can greatly improve two separate position groupings from good to elite. That's of more value than WR#8. We need elite young cost controlled talent for now, and for the near future. You don't get that by drafting lower rated players at higher rated positions according to unqualified draftniks. We got EXCELLENT value in round 2 with late first/early 2nd rated guys at positions of need; and the Offensive line has gone from our biggest weakness to an elite group for this season and seasons to come. The LB corps from our biggest defensive weakness to one with great promise for this season and the near future. We made our team weaknesses into strengths. |
Posts: 17,802
|
9 0 |
|
|