|
|
View Poll Results: Will Kadarius Toney exceed his avg of 170 yards per season as a Chief? | |||
170< |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
41 | 46.59% |
0<170 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
47 | 53.41% |
Voters: 88. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() ![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#16 |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Northern Kansas
|
|
Posts: 21,779
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
MVP
Join Date: Jan 2015
|
|
Posts: 6,411
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Hey Loochy, I'm hooome!
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: PooPooKaKaPeePeeShire
|
He's not going to get to 170 yards...no way because he's so rarely going to see the field. Realistically, who is he going to replace for playing time?
Last edited by loochy; 07-25-2024 at 09:28 AM.. |
Posts: 41,065
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
MVP
Join Date: Jan 2015
|
|
Posts: 6,411
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
MVP
Join Date: Oct 2012
|
Ok you need a RB to leak out to the flat Pacheco just went two carries for 3 yards each. You have CEH or Toney who can receive out of the back field. Choose wisely.
|
Posts: 11,477
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
MVP
Join Date: Jan 2015
|
|
Posts: 6,411
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Independence, MO
|
First team reps and alot of encouragement get him to play good in the PS. If Rice's suspension is short, that's when we flip for for something.
|
Posts: 28,446
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
Supporter
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Liberty
|
170? Is he even gonna make the team?
|
Posts: 16,964
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#24 | |
Supporter
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Who knows?
|
Quote:
He flails when he runs routes. It’s very ugly. He is fast, so there’s that. |
|
Posts: 84,196
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
MVP
Join Date: Oct 2012
|
|
Posts: 11,477
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
Sauntering Vaguely Downwards
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Columbia, Mo
|
I really do hope to see him used on the boundary more.
Even if he's lining up in the slot, I'd rather see him running wheels from there. The drags and crossers just don't work for him. He gets too rushed and doesn't watch the ball in. He gets a little jittery when he knows contact is coming as well, IMO. But on the sideline I think he can do some real work. Keep him outside the hashes and I think he can be damn dangerous for us. Even if that comes from weird shit where he starts in the backfield in the gun and then motions out wide opposite of a bunch or something (and I think that would be a TON of fun). |
Posts: 61,765
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#27 | |
MVP
Join Date: Jan 2015
|
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 6,411
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 | |
Sauntering Vaguely Downwards
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Columbia, Mo
|
Quote:
But I look at it the same way as I look at inaccurate QBs. Most people wanna take a QB with iffy accuracy and make him a short passer. I hate that idea. The risk/reward knob isn't where it needs to be. If your 'reward' from an iffy passer is a 7 yard gain but the risk is he misfires on a pass over the middle or on a short out that a LB or CB jumps and houses, you've got a real problem on your hands. Meanwhile if he's throwing downfield, the reward is a 50 yard gain and the risk is an arm punt. I think you need a RAZOR accurate passer for a short passing game. I think a deep passing game can work with a more erratic passer. I think most people believe the opposite and most COACHES seem to do the opposite. So when you have a guy with erratic focus and route running, I think using him for gadget/short plays doesn't provide enough reward for the risk. I think he' as likely to drop a screen pass (that could well be a fumble if it's backwards) or bump a quick hitter up in the air for a CB to snag and take the other way as he is to duff a ball 40 yards downfield. And if that's the case, gimme the ball 40 yards downfield where a catch is huge and a drop is probably just gonna go OOB. |
|
Posts: 61,765
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
Sometimes it's black and white
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: California
|
|
Posts: 6,354
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
__
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Springpatch
|
It wouldn't surprise me if he goes off for like 80 yards one game on three fantastic plays.
Then he drops a pass the next game and a few snaps later tweaks a hamstring and we don't see him until Week 12, completely phased out. |
Posts: 59,383
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
|
|