|
|
02-15-2024, 02:18 PM | #2 |
Andy Reid Supporter
Join Date: Apr 2012
|
This might be a good year to trade down if we get stuck in no man's land like last year. Michael Penix Jr might be a guy teams want to trade more for at 32 to get the 5th year option. We could get more in a trade in that scenario.
|
Posts: 46,358
|
02-20-2024, 02:39 PM | #3 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2008
|
Quote:
Atlanta Falcons Draft Picks by Round in 2024 Round 1, Pick 8 Round 2, Pick 43 Round 3, Pick 74 Round 3, Pick 79 (from JAX)* Round 4, Pick 109 Round 5, Pick 141 Round 6, Pick 198 (via CLE) |
|
Posts: 2,367
|
02-20-2024, 04:27 PM | #4 | |
MVP
Join Date: Jan 2015
|
Quote:
We'd end up with... #42 (2nd) #64 (2nd) #74 (3rd) #79 (3rd) |
|
Posts: 6,264
|
02-20-2024, 04:33 PM | #5 |
Sauntering Vaguely Downwards
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Columbia, Mo
|
|
Posts: 60,838
|
1 0 |
02-20-2024, 04:37 PM | #6 |
MVP
Join Date: Jan 2015
|
|
Posts: 6,264
|
02-20-2024, 05:43 PM | #7 |
MVP
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Michigan
|
I agree with this. 43, 79, and 110 actually work out exactly on the Rich Hill model.
|
Posts: 12,682
|
02-15-2024, 02:21 PM | #8 |
Hockey Town
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Kansas City, Missouri
|
If anything Justin Reid earned an extension and it would lower his number.
|
Posts: 111,179
|
02-20-2024, 09:25 AM | #9 |
Has a particular set of skills
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: On the water
|
|
Posts: 79,275
|
02-20-2024, 02:25 PM | #10 |
MVP
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Michigan
|
|
Posts: 12,682
|
02-20-2024, 02:44 PM | #11 | |
Sauntering Vaguely Downwards
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Columbia, Mo
|
Quote:
If someone says "hey, he's not what I hoped he'd be in coverage so I don't think I want to extend him..." then I get that. I don't agree - that's not his job. But I at least see the argument. But the age thing makes no sense to me for a guy who doesn't rely on explosive athleticism for his production. |
|
Posts: 60,838
|
02-20-2024, 09:20 AM | #12 |
Has a particular set of skills
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: On the water
|
Seems to me that staying in the first round has an advantage rarely talked about as value.... We get another year of a rookie deal. Being able to keep George and McDuffie on a 5th year rookie deal will save our cap in a year or two.
|
Posts: 79,275
|
02-20-2024, 06:57 PM | #13 |
MVP
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Michigan
|
I'd almost rather move up than down depending on the situation that presents itself. I just don't like dropping down very often because almost always you take the L.
I think Arizona is an easy target at 27 with a future pick. I think you might be able to pull off sending them a 2025 3rd and get back a 2025 5th for that move. They don't need more picks this year. I think there could be some advantages there if you're looking at WR/OL/DL with that last pick and having to run the gauntlet before us. |
Posts: 12,682
|
1 0 |
02-21-2024, 09:24 AM | #14 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2008
|
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 2,367
|
02-21-2024, 10:38 AM | #15 | |
MVP
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Michigan
|
Quote:
If we're looking at round 1... I'd be thinking about Guyton if he was there at 23 and we hadn't addressed LT adequately in FA. If one of Murphy or Newton makes it to 22 and we lose Chris Jones, I'd think hard about that move. I think my target in round 2 would be to 50 which will probably cost a 3rd round pick. You don't really know what might fall there. It's really just whether or not somebody tumbles unexpectedly... Kamari Lassiter, JaTavion Sanders, T'Vondre Sweat, Edgerrin Cooper, Xavier Worthy, Ruke Orhorhoro... those are the types of guys where you never know. |
|
Posts: 12,682
|
1 0 |
|
|