Star Trek: Starfleet Academy series... CONFIRMED

[RealSNR]

Originally Posted by Mephistopheles Janx

Why does that make you groan?

We now have Strange New Worlds set in the pre TOS era, Picard recently ended following up the TNG era, and Discovery went into the future.

Lower Decks, which is amazing and if you don't like it you are wrong, is post TNG era as well.

On top of that we are getting a Section 31 movie and we are getting a pre TOS movie which will be produced by the man that brought us the Deadpool movies, Logan, and SW: Rebels.

https://deadline.com/2024/05/simon-k...lm-1235926001/

I think they're going to look and sound like morons if they set it in the 32nd century.

No discernible differences in ship or technology advancements from the 24th century other than apparently everyone time travels like it's nothing.

It's one thing to jump a century+ from the original series into the TNG era. But practically a millennium? Gross.

[Mephistopheles Janx]

Originally Posted by RealSNR

I think they're going to look and sound like morons if they set it in the 32nd century.

No discernible differences in ship or technology advancements from the 24th century other than apparently everyone time travels like it's nothing.

It's one thing to jump a century+ from the original series into the TNG era. But practically a millennium? Gross.

What tech did you want to see improved upon?

Courtesy of the shit-show that was Discovery we have:

* Nacelles that are Quantum locked onto the ship and can be moved to change the configuration of the ship.

* more powerful tricorders that gave more information and could be imbedded in the person's eye

* they can now reliably use transwarp conduits and quantum slipstrerams

* the transporter has a much greater range now

* personal transporters on tri-com badges

* programmable matter

* weapons that appear in their hands on command vs holstered

---

Don't forget that "the burn" severely reduced the Federation's numbers thus it hacked at their ability to create a bunch of new tech. Hell, it also limited their movement thus materials were far more scarce.

For some reason... the Mirror Universe bothers me more than time travel.

[Hammock Parties]

Originally Posted by RealSNR

I think they're going to look and sound like morons if they set it in the 32nd century.

Just set it post Picard. There's no reason to get crazy...the same damn era worked for the best decade of Trek, um, ever?

[Mephistopheles Janx]

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties

Just set it post Picard. There's no reason to get crazy...the same damn era worked for the best decade of Trek, um, ever?

As you can see by the OP... I'm not in disagreement about when this show should have been set in and you can see who I think should have been the lead.

I don't know why they would look or sound like morons just because it is set in the 32nd century... any more than TOS or TNG did for being set when they were in relation to when they aired.

Not that I am trying to convince you to like it... if anything I will reserve those efforts for Lower Decks.

[lawrenceRaider]

Originally Posted by Mephistopheles Janx

As you can see by the OP... I'm not in disagreement about when this show should have been set in and you can see who I think should have been the lead.

I don't know why they would look or sound like morons just because it is set in the 32nd century... any more than TOS or TNG did for being set when they were in relation to when they aired.

Not that I am trying to convince you to like it... if anything I will reserve those efforts for Lower Decks.

Lower Decks is so damn good.