|
|
06-06-2022, 04:21 PM | #2 |
Sauntering Vaguely Downwards
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Columbia, Mo
|
That's 4100 ft/minute, no?
That's pretty damn severe, especially for a sub-sonic trainer. About 7 times what a Cessna is rated for. I'm guessing it just doesn't have the power to simply go nose up and rocket without running out of inertia and stalling. It looks like a maneuverable little thing but doesn't seem like it's incredibly powerful. |
Posts: 62,426
|
06-06-2022, 06:56 PM | #3 | |
Supporter
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Who knows?
|
Quote:
A fun side fact. F-16s and SU-27s climb around 75,000 feet per minute. You won’t find an official number, though. Secrets and stuff. |
|
Posts: 85,085
|
06-06-2022, 07:54 PM | #4 | |
Sauntering Vaguely Downwards
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Columbia, Mo
|
Quote:
The F-16’s really is/was amazing. That kind of performance and agility at those price tags just doesn’t happen often. Really a remarkable service history for the ‘cheap’ option in our fleet. They set out to build a low-cost alternative to the F-15 and ended up with a damn workhorse. Remarkable work there. |
|
Posts: 62,426
|
06-06-2022, 08:03 PM | #5 | |
Supporter
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Who knows?
|
Quote:
The F-18 has amazing nose authority that rivals the Su-27/35 and MIG-29/35. The F-16 is an absolute monster at maintaining energy while doing combat maneuvers. The F-16 XL is amazing in different ways, just didn't have two engines like the Strike Eagle so it lost. |
|
Posts: 85,085
|
06-06-2022, 08:18 PM | #6 | |
Sauntering Vaguely Downwards
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Columbia, Mo
|
Quote:
It doesn’t have thrust vectoring, does it? What gives it that kind of ability to maneuver like that? I thought thrust vectoring was kinda what made that kind of nose authority possible? Definitely a bit over my skiis there… |
|
Posts: 62,426
|
1 0 |
06-07-2022, 07:23 AM | #7 | |
Supporter
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Who knows?
|
Quote:
The wing extensions on each side of the canopy (greatly enlarged from the YF-17 to F-18) are what gives it amazing nose control at all speeds. If an opponent gets a little slow against an 18 it's ****ed. The only plane that has thrust vectoring (and only 2 dimensional) is the F-22, for the US. I guess the Marine F-35 counts, but I think it's only used for takeoff and landing just like the Harrier. Our designers determined there is way too much energy lost while using 3 dimensional vectoring. The Russians have it on a few planes, and they appear to defy physics. It would be on everything if the US determined it increases lethality. Last edited by notorious; 06-07-2022 at 07:34 AM.. |
|
Posts: 85,085
|
|
|