*** 2020 Prospect Tracker: Chiefs Interest / Visits / Work Outs ***

[Chris Meck]

Originally Posted by UChieffyBugger

And that's why 32 teams should be THANKING THE GOOD LORD that you're not their damn GM . We just won the SB with no great CB's, LB's or guards!!..so I really don't know why folks are so obsessed with those positions but then run down the need for a competent running game. Swift might very well be there for us at 32 and IF Veach takes him I'd be more than happy with that choice and why? Because he's a damn good player who could start first day, that's why.

and no great RB. So what's your point exactly?

No in the first. Probably not in the second. Third? Yeah, okay.

[DrRyan]

Originally Posted by UChieffyBugger

And that's why 32 teams should be THANKING THE GOOD LORD that you're not their damn GM . We just won the SB with no great CB's, LB's or guards!!..so I really don't know why folks are so obsessed with those positions but then run down the need for a competent running game. Swift might very well be there for us at 32 and IF Veach takes him I'd be more than happy with that choice and why? Because he's a damn good player who could start first day, that's why.

You are clueless aren't you? Probably "obsessed" with those positions because there are 2 CBs under contract for next season. Are you forgetting Breeland and Fuller are free agents? Also because there is so much more value likely in those positions than RB st 32.

Originally Posted by Chris Meck

and no great RB. So what's your point exactly?

No in the first. Probably not in the second. Third? Yeah, okay.

Cam Akers in the third over any available RB at 32. LB/CB or CB/LB almost will provide better long and shoddy term results than RB at 32 and whatever follows. If Akers is gone, WR/IOL round 3.

[UChieffyBugger]

Originally Posted by DrRyan

You are clueless aren't you? Probably "obsessed" with those positions because there are 2 CBs under contract for next season. Are you forgetting Breeland and Fuller are free agents? Also because there is so much more value likely in those positions than RB st 32.



Cam Akers in the third over any available RB at 32. LB/CB or CB/LB almost will provide better long and shoddy term results than RB at 32 and whatever follows. If Akers is gone, WR/IOL round 3.

So we can't get a cb In the second round? Smh no-one is saying don't address the cb position...all I'm saying is don't act like we need Jalen Ramsey to win...because we just proved we don't.

[UChieffyBugger]

Originally Posted by Chris Meck

and no great RB. So what's your point exactly?

No in the first. Probably not in the second. Third? Yeah, okay.

Oh look..a mere mention of taking a RB early and the famous RB hater makes a sharp appearance...what a surprise

[Chris Meck]

Originally Posted by UChieffyBugger

Oh look..a mere mention of taking a RB early and the famous RB hater makes a sharp appearance...what a surprise

no, you just way overvalue the position as if it's 1975. It's not.

I'd take Akers in the 3rd.

[UChieffyBugger]

Originally Posted by Chris Meck

no, you just way overvalue the position as if it's 1975. It's not.

I'd take Akers in the 3rd.

Ok well done i agree with you for once re Akers