Sneed traded to Titans

[Smed1065]

Originally Posted by IowaHawkeyeChief

you forgot to equate the $19.6 million...

Puff, Cash bonus could have been used. I mean that would be like change in our pockets to Clark.

[IowaHawkeyeChief]

Originally Posted by Smed1065

Puff, Cash bonus could have been used. I mean that would be like change in our pockets to Clark.

What? Clark and the Chiefs max out the cap, and actually push off cap each and every year. Clark can't just pay extra to keep Sneed. The Chiefs made the decision that pushing off more cap and keeping Sneed wasn't worth it with the impending contracts of Creed, Bolton, McDuffie and others. Those of you who think this isn't a real thing are delusional.

[RunKC]

Originally Posted by Pasta Little Brioni

There are those of us that think you just hold onto him instead of taking peanuts.

What do you guys not understand about this? It’s not financially responsible, especially after they caved and gave Chris Jones a **** ton of money.

They had to choose who they were paying and it wasn’t Sneed

[J Diddy]

Originally Posted by Pasta Little Brioni

There are those of us that think you just hold onto him instead of taking peanuts.

and which 10 players do you let go to keep the 1?

[jjchieffan]

I read this morning that Florio is now saying that the Chiefs should be penalized for violating the CBA because taking such little compensation implies that they never had any intentions of retaining Sneed. The CBA states that a good faith effort must be made to sign the player and that a player can't be tagged just for the intention of gaining compensation for said player.

[raybec 4]

Originally Posted by jjchieffan

I read this morning that Florio is now saying that the Chiefs should be penalized for violating the CBA because taking such little compensation implies that they never had any intentions of retaining Sneed. The CBA states that a good faith effort must be made to sign the player and that a player can't be tagged just for the intention of gaining compensation for said player.

Can you link that?

[IowaHawkeyeChief]

Originally Posted by raybec 4

Can you link that?

if he does, don't post it. Don't give that miserable cuck any clicks.

[jjchieffan]

Originally Posted by raybec 4

Can you link that?

https://gridironheroics.com/nflpa-lj...y-chiefs-news/

Mike Florio with NBC Sports was also confused by the Chiefs’ decision and thinks the front office might have flirted with breaking Collective Bargaining Agreement rules on the matter. Florio suggests the Chiefs didn’t intend to extend Sneed when they placed the franchise tag on him, which isn’t allowed under the current rules set by the NFLPA

[C-Mac]

Originally Posted by jjchieffan

https://gridironheroics.com/nflpa-lj...y-chiefs-news/

Mike Florio with NBC Sports was also confused by the Chiefs’ decision and thinks the front office might have flirted with breaking Collective Bargaining Agreement rules on the matter. Florio suggests the Chiefs didn’t intend to extend Sneed when they placed the franchise tag on him, which isn’t allowed under the current rules set by the NFLPA

Hmmm..
How is it that they can openly tag a player and then give them permission for them to speak and seek a trade with other teams and yet... not break thus stated rule by Florio?

[Rain Man]

Originally Posted by jjchieffan

https://gridironheroics.com/nflpa-lj...y-chiefs-news/

Mike Florio with NBC Sports was also confused by the Chiefs’ decision and thinks the front office might have flirted with breaking Collective Bargaining Agreement rules on the matter. Florio suggests the Chiefs didn’t intend to extend Sneed when they placed the franchise tag on him, which isn’t allowed under the current rules set by the NFLPA

It's good to know what Florio thinks so I can conclude that the exact opposite is true.

[pugsnotdrugs19]

Originally Posted by jjchieffan

I read this morning that Florio is now saying that the Chiefs should be penalized for violating the CBA because taking such little compensation implies that they never had any intentions of retaining Sneed. The CBA states that a good faith effort must be made to sign the player and that a player can't be tagged just for the intention of gaining compensation for said player.

Lol the league has much bigger issues at hand than the Chiefs helping a player get the most money he could get.

Florio only exists to babble about bullshit.

[Bl00dyBizkitz]

Originally Posted by jjchieffan

I read this morning that Florio is now saying that the Chiefs should be penalized for violating the CBA because taking such little compensation implies that they never had any intentions of retaining Sneed. The CBA states that a good faith effort must be made to sign the player and that a player can't be tagged just for the intention of gaining compensation for said player.

LOL imagine trying to police this.

"Good faith"? There's basically no way to punish someone for this unless it's incredibly obvious the player on the tag is getting screwed over. Which isn't the case with the Chiefs.

[Red Dawg]

Originally Posted by jjchieffan

I read this morning that Florio is now saying that the Chiefs should be penalized for violating the CBA because taking such little compensation implies that they never had any intentions of retaining Sneed. The CBA states that a good faith effort must be made to sign the player and that a player can't be tagged just for the intention of gaining compensation for said player.

What a load of BS. Snead got the bag he wanted and somehow we are the bad guys? The transition tag is for this exact thing. Getting 2 picks is not nothing. What a moron.

[FloridaMan88]

Originally Posted by jjchieffan

I read this morning that Florio is now saying that the Chiefs should be penalized for violating the CBA because taking such little compensation implies that they never had any intentions of retaining Sneed. The CBA states that a good faith effort must be made to sign the player and that a player can't be tagged just for the intention of gaining compensation for said player.

Florio should be penalized for pretending to be an NFL "insider".