|
01-26-2021, 11:34 AM | #2 |
M-I-Z-Z-O-U
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Kansas City
|
I like it. Personally would tend towards keeping Remmers and swinging at Moton in FA instead of Samuel.
Questions re: 1st and second picks... What DE/OT options did you see available at each of those spots (if you remember?) |
Posts: 21,432
|
01-26-2021, 11:35 AM | #3 |
'Tis my eye!
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Chiefsplanet
|
Essentially 3 rookies starting on the offensive line with Allegretti and a guy that missed an entire season.
That would be awful. Sorry. |
Posts: 100,044
|
2 0 |
01-26-2021, 11:36 AM | #4 |
'Tis my eye!
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Chiefsplanet
|
And don't get me wrong, it's not the draft that I really have a problem with, it's the starting lineup.
I don't think you're just dropping 2 rooks and Niang in there day 1 and actually having them excel. They'll be worse than they are now possibly, which would be a disaster. |
Posts: 100,044
|
01-26-2021, 12:41 PM | #5 | |
Supporter
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hollywood, CA
|
Quote:
And $12.5 million per year for a guy that has 14 TD's in 4 years? |
|
Posts: 88,960
|
01-26-2021, 01:19 PM | #6 | |
__
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Springpatch
|
Quote:
I remember virtually no Spags-preferred DEs on the board at this slot. A couple WR and S options, and several tackles available. |
|
Posts: 59,421
|
01-26-2021, 01:21 PM | #7 | ||
__
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Springpatch
|
Quote:
Quote:
I am keeping Remmers in this simulation, however, in the off chance that Niang doesn't have it. If Niang doesn't show out, I'll swap him with Remmers on the depth chart. Humphrey would be a legit rookie, however, not one who's ready Day One like Eichenberg, but that's why I kept Kilgore for pennies on the dollar. |
||
Posts: 59,421
|
01-26-2021, 01:24 PM | #8 | |
__
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Springpatch
|
Quote:
I don't know if you were willing to pay Clark, Mathieu, or Watkins their per-years at the time we signed them, but I thought we overpaid in all three cases when we signed them. Veach is willing to pay retail price if it means slotting someone who's perfect for the team. And Curtis Samuel would do soooooooooo much damage in this scheme. He's an absolute perfect fit, we have the need for him, and there's going to be a bidding war for him. |
|
Posts: 59,421
|
01-26-2021, 02:02 PM | #9 |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2002
|
I don't think we can re-sign Remmers for vet minimum. Especially if we win the Super Bowl with him playing LT. I think he'll have a nice market as a swing tackle, and some teams might see him as a short-term starting RT. I don't think he'll get a huge contract or anything, but I'd expect him to do better than the $2.5 million Dallas gave Cam Erving.
|
Posts: 1,429
|
01-26-2021, 02:06 PM | #10 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Hawaii
|
Quote:
As to Curtis, I agree with Dane that's too much. We can just as easily grab someone in the draft in the 1st if need be. I'd rather do that and put the 12.5 towards the line. Linsley is a FA, and while GB will likely resign him- who knows what they do since they paid Bhaktari a fortune and now Arod has gone diva on them again. I also don't see why you let Baker go. He should be completely healthy by the early portion of the season. He's young, has an excellent pedigree and kept his nose clean while he was here. More importantly, he played very well in his short time with us, netting a sack in his only 2 quarters he played. He won't cost us much and if he hits, we found a lockdown DB who can blitz. |
|
Posts: 5,974
|
01-26-2021, 02:07 PM | #11 | |
__
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Springpatch
|
Quote:
We absolutely have to. He's played both tackles and at least one guard spot for us this year. He's way too versatile and he's been a revelation for us. |
|
Posts: 59,421
|
01-26-2021, 02:11 PM | #12 | |
__
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Springpatch
|
Quote:
I do agree that they have been "worth it" now that we know they end up with at least one Super Bowl victory. But at the time, I quoted the adage that I "love the player, hate the contract" with all three guys. I can't hold you to this because I don't know you, but be honest. Did you think those three contracts were too much when we signed them? I think that contract is absolutely paying retail for Samuels, but I'm telling you guys, he fits like a glove for what we like to do offensively. His numbers are going to shoot up and he's the guy that beats Richard Sherman to win the Super Bowl. He just needs a better offensive system to bring that out of him. It will prove to be worth it, I think. |
|
Posts: 59,421
|
01-26-2021, 02:23 PM | #13 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Hawaii
|
Quote:
As to Badger, I liked it but had no idea he'd be anywhere as good as he has been and would be able to stay as healthy as he has. I get that we need another WR, but resources should be better spent on our devastated line. I'd agree with the rest of these guys that we should go after Moton, but I have serious doubts that Carolina won't resign him. They're paying CMC a ton and might go QB in the 1st. They need blockers up front. |
|
Posts: 5,974
|
01-26-2021, 02:25 PM | #14 |
Rufus Dawes Jr.
Join Date: Aug 2000
|
Agree. This is why I can see Veach spending FA money on the offensive line vs WR. Draft that WR, let Mahomes. develop a star. I also think if we are trading for OJ Howard we have to be extending him because he's pretty spendy for a one year 5th option...
|
Posts: 17,519
|
01-26-2021, 03:53 PM | #15 | |
Supporter
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hollywood, CA
|
Quote:
Curtis Samuel will be lucky to get even $6 million per. $12.5 is insanity. |
|
Posts: 88,960
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|