|
02-17-2022, 06:12 PM | Topic Starter |
MVP
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Michigan
|
Revisit: Trade Tyreek
I recall a thread in here or in the Lounge either during the season or last offseason about trading Tyreek but I can't seem to find it.
Anyhow, I thought at the time that the very notion was absurd but now I'm having second thoughts. Then again, maybe it's the few brain cells I still call "active" just bouncing around in the endless space they have available. I know that KC has a need at WR already but they also have to look at the future. I think about the Vikings trading away Stefon Diggs and I thought how stupid it was until they drafted what may be a better player in Justin Jefferson with the 1st round pick they got and saved a load of money in the process. Now, the Bills gave up a 1st, 5th, 6th, and future 4th for Diggs and a 7th. When I think about how dynamic Hill is in terms of being a game-changer in a split second, I think he may bring a bigger return. So, hypothetical... Let's say a team calls you up that's in desperate need of a sure-fire playmaker because they just don't possess any. My logical thought for such a thing would be the Atlanta Falcons. Part I The Falcons offer you the 8th overall pick and their 3rd round pick #74. You pretend your Bart and field the call. Do you accept the trade and save $18 million on the cap this year, thus rolling the dice by needing both a #1 and #2 receiver, or do you decline and force your hand to pay this guy at least another 90 million (and likely more) over the next 4 years? Part II The Falcons are gun shy and don't want to give up the #8 overall but the Eagles call offering 15 and 83 because they think Hill puts them over the top. Would you still do the deal if you'd do it for #8 or would you back out? Part III If you still haven't said no freakin' way, at what point do you say no? |
Posts: 12,724
|
|
|