|
|
![]() |
Topic Starter |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Jan 2016
|
AFC rivals haven't closed gap on Chiefs...
A good read here in case you missed it, I will put the text in a spoiler...
https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/draft/...his-offseason/
Spoiler!
|
Posts: 27,021
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
offense > defense
Join Date: Jul 2005
|
Not only did no one close the gap -- the Chiefs just made it even wider. We improved more than any other team (contender) in the AFC did.
|
Posts: 8,924
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Andy Reid Supporter
Join Date: Apr 2012
|
Nobody is on our level but I think one team deserves a lot of credit.
The Browns They had one of the best offseasons of any team. They completely revamped their secondary and defense overall. John Johnson Troy Hill Grant Delpit-back after IR as a rookie Greg Newsome Anthony Walker Jeremiah Owusu-Koramoah Then they added Tak McKinnley, Malik Jackson and Clowney. Not huge fans of them but as your 3rd, 4th and 5th rushers? Not bad. They had a terrific offseason. Too bad about that whole Baker Mayfield thing though ![]() |
Posts: 46,426
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
MVP
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Canada
|
I would argue Cleveland has had a great offseason and might be ready for a deep playoff run
|
Posts: 8,151
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
The Insider
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Lake of the Ozarks
|
|
Posts: 49,875
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Jul 2009
|
Cleveland looks really solid on paper. Will be all about Baker.
|
Posts: 81,574
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
MVP
Join Date: May 2001
Location: midtown KC
|
I think both Buffalo and Cleveland had good, solid drafts and will be improved.
|
Posts: 17,575
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Rookie
Join Date: Apr 2019
|
The other AFC teams were no threat to the Chiefs last year, and will not be this year. The only real threats are in the NFC.
|
Posts: 0
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
It was not a fair catch
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Correcting papers
|
|
Posts: 36,737
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
SUPER BOWL CHAMPIONS
Join Date: Aug 2013
|
Cleveland is maybe the biggest threat now to me. I think we saw peak Buffalo last year.
|
Posts: 26,383
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Veteran
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Tucson AZ
|
|
Posts: 4,165
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Jan 2016
|
|
Posts: 27,021
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
Generational Player
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Honolulu
|
Quote:
They also spent a 2nd on Epenesa last year and for some weird reason told him to lose all this weight when he is a player that wins with power. |
|
Posts: 2,732
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
I’m a Mahomo!
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Mid-Missouri
|
Miami killed this draft thanks in part to the trade with Houston.
Glad they didn't draft Herbert last year. If they add Watson or Rodgers....watch out! |
Posts: 54,038
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
SUPER BOWL CHAMPIONS
Join Date: Aug 2013
|
I’ll say this too - if an AFC team adds Rodgers or Watson (if he can play), that team might obviously jump to 2nd on the list immediately.
Miami or Denver both would IMO. |
Posts: 26,383
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
|
|