|
03-08-2024, 09:49 PM | #2 |
MVP
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Helena, MT
|
Also, apologies the formatting isn't prettier - really just wanted to get it out there. I may come back and pretty it up as a template for future attempts.
|
Posts: 18,631
|
03-08-2024, 10:32 PM | #3 |
MVP
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Michigan
|
Thanks for the share. A few too many WRs for my tastes but I like the overall objective.
|
Posts: 12,761
|
1 0 |
03-08-2024, 10:49 PM | #4 |
MVP
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Helena, MT
|
I get it, it's extreme. But I am trying to take advantage of the deepest WR class, probably ever, to help the Chiefs win next year and set up their next orientation of success. Cost controlled weapons at high value positions seems like the ticket to that success.
|
Posts: 18,631
|
03-08-2024, 11:09 PM | #5 |
MVP
Join Date: Jan 2015
|
I like the concept a lot!
I really like Coleman, Sweat, Wilson, Guerendo, and Hall. I think people are sleeping on Wilson as a hybrid or TE transition. Coleman might be my top choice for a WR at #32, swapping Sneed for him would be a nice deal. Good stuff! |
Posts: 6,704
|
03-09-2024, 10:02 PM | #6 |
MVP
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Helena, MT
|
I feel like I got pretty close on the contract for Jones. Curious what years 4 and 5 look like. If they are both AAV inflators or if year 4 seems like a real year and year 5 is a void year.
|
Posts: 18,631
|
03-10-2024, 01:28 AM | #7 |
Starter
Join Date: Apr 2023
|
I like it.
Especially like bringing in Smith and I hope we can get him at tackle. Also, Lake Wilson at tight end in the draft and as can be a replacement for Kelsey and possibly allow us to use a two tight end package more often in the interim. Not sure Coleman is the right answer as the number one pick for receiver, but there are different opinions on alternatives. |
Posts: 405
|
03-10-2024, 07:12 AM | #8 |
M-I-Z-Z-O-U
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Kansas City
|
Man, good looking exercise. You were close on the Jones deal.
I have a hard time seeing them skew that heavy on receiving weapons early but two picks in that bucket from the first 4 seems reasonable/likely. |
Posts: 21,493
|
03-10-2024, 03:36 PM | #9 | |
MVP
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Michigan
|
Quote:
I doubt they leave free agency without a veteran addition. They are definitely keeping Watson around. You have Rice. I doubt they let both of Moore and Toney go on rookie contracts. You still have Ross floating around too. I'd say you have 4 absolutes. I could see them double-dipping but 3 or 4? I don't know about that. Other holes to fill, other long-term objectives. Even though we re-signed Jones and Buggs, we still have work to do at DT. We could probably use a LB. We could probably use a DB. And then OT remains a question mark. |
|
Posts: 12,761
|
03-10-2024, 03:52 PM | #10 | |
sorta mod-ish
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: KC North
|
Quote:
Agreed it's receiver heavy. I'd rather see one of those receiver picks go towards a flier on a smaller school athletic TE, but I'm not sure we need to do that just yet with Gray as the solid #2 and Bell/Bushman(maybe?) and Fortson still in the mix (IS Fortson still in the mix??). Mitchell and Coleman BOTH would piss off the rest of the league, lol. |
|
Posts: 103,752
|
03-10-2024, 05:40 PM | #11 |
MVP
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Helena, MT
|
No one is obligated to agree or anything, but I left a roster with 8 WRs, including Ross and Toney. That is one WR over last year. I figure if Toney makes it to camp, he probably doesn't make the roster unless his head is on straight. It's true, I did not bring Watson back.
But with a historically deep wide receiver class, having the opportunity to set up the next iteration of Chiefs success was the goal: Rookie WRs take time to get integrated into the Andy Reid offense. So we sign Noah Brown to provide an additional reliable target in the interim, and work on getting Mitchell focused on that Z tree. This approach is the offensive mirror to the approach taken in the 2022 draft class to address the secondary - when they took 4 CBs and a Safety. If the Chiefs don't go out and build the WR corps through free agency, they will have a lot more latitude to sign important, but less costly pieces for the future. |
Posts: 18,631
|
03-10-2024, 05:42 PM | #12 | |
MVP
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Helena, MT
|
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 18,631
|
1 0 |
03-10-2024, 06:02 PM | #13 |
Starter
Join Date: Jan 2018
|
We've been clamoring for WRs in the draft to little avail even back to when Tyreek was here lol. Lots of talent in this draft to not take one early but I wouldn't be surprised if we didn't take one let alone two before the 4th lol
|
Posts: 673
|
03-10-2024, 06:28 PM | #14 |
[b]Supporter[/b]
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: A Hypnagogic Landscape
|
Swap out Kinlaw for Tart and Coleman for Patrick Paul and lfg
|
Posts: 12,590
|
03-10-2024, 11:03 PM | #15 |
MVP
Join Date: Jan 2015
|
I like the idea of brining in T Smith and going with two WRs in the top 50 picks.
|
Posts: 6,704
|
|
|