|
|
02-18-2022, 01:49 PM | #2 |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Jul 2009
|
|
Posts: 82,341
|
02-18-2022, 02:13 PM | #3 |
M-I-Z-Z-O-U
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Kansas City
|
|
Posts: 21,435
|
02-18-2022, 02:38 PM | #4 |
Bolton gonna knock you out
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: They Freed Kartel!!
|
What about a trade with SF where they get Reek and our first, and we get Deebo and Fred Warner?
|
Posts: 20,908
|
02-21-2022, 11:26 AM | #5 |
MVP
Join Date: Oct 2012
|
|
Posts: 11,568
|
02-18-2022, 03:08 PM | #6 |
Rufus Dawes Jr.
Join Date: Aug 2000
|
Hill is amazing.
He's 27 years old and on a hall of fame pace. He's a freak, works his ass off at improving his craft. I don't see him slowing down anytime soon. Want to give him a 5 year contract, I'm game. Want to play some games and sign him to a 7 year deal (I know unheard of these days) go ahead, because I think he will be a very productive player well into his 30s. You just don't find dudes like him. |
Posts: 17,522
|
02-19-2022, 01:22 PM | #7 |
Replaced by a future HOFer !!
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: donkey land
|
Darrell Green could still run 4.3 when he retired.
Tyreek is still a 4.2 guy and probably like Darrell will do so barring injury for some time. NO WAY !!!!! |
Posts: 27,062
|
02-18-2022, 04:01 PM | #8 |
MVP
Join Date: Aug 2017
|
An elite deep threat opens up any offense.
You don't trade those guys. They are rare animals. |
Posts: 14,657
|
02-19-2022, 12:33 PM | #9 | |||||||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2018
|
Quote:
Quote:
I'd take Chase for Hill as well I think Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Warner is on a 100m contract, Deebo is on the last year of his rookie deal next year. You're not getting cheaper or better really by doing this. Hence stupid. Quote:
Quote:
You can also look at it from the team perspective. the Chiefs were 3rd overall on offensive DVOA and 23rd in defensive DVOA. I think that the Chiefs offense would drop in these rankings if you traded Hill and then spent 20-30m avg per year on receivers to replace him, but how much better could the defense get with those resources from Atlanta? |
|||||||
Posts: 2,356
|
02-18-2022, 04:01 PM | #10 |
Andy Reid Supporter
Join Date: Apr 2012
|
Are you ****ing nuts? Seriously?
|
Posts: 47,725
|
1 0 |
02-18-2022, 07:19 PM | #11 |
Everything is Awesome!!!!!
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: The Pitt
|
13 seconds…..
|
Posts: 11,312
|
02-19-2022, 12:24 PM | #12 |
MVP
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Michigan
|
I feel like you guys are all looking at this inside a box like I did when Chargem originally posed the thought. I didn't bring everything up, hoping others would see things differently and add to the conversation more.
What if Tyreek won't get an extension done? What if he is willing to do an extension but won't convert that roster bonus into a signing bonus to spread the hit out? Are you going to tag for two years? Are you going to tag and trade in one of the next two years? There are some solid options out there to mitigate the damages if you do trade Tyreek and I'm just throwing out things that could happen. I'm 100% with you Hoover, I'd love for Tyreek to do an extension, spread that roster bonus in 2022 out, be reasonable and not expect Hopkins+ money. A lot has to happen though. |
Posts: 12,723
|
02-19-2022, 01:14 PM | #13 | |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Jul 2009
|
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 82,341
|
02-19-2022, 01:56 PM | #14 |
MVP
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Michigan
|
Why should he make more?
1) Hopkins' contract is ridiculously more than any other receiver contract out there (5.5m per more) 2) Hill is not the best receiver in the NFL. He's HOF caliber good and that speed is special but he's not the best right now. |
Posts: 12,723
|
02-19-2022, 02:59 PM | #15 | |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Jul 2009
|
Quote:
There may be a better route runner, or something similar but in terms of all that comes with it? Nah. |
|
Posts: 82,341
|
|
|