Quote:
Originally Posted by Frazod
Defleckshun hates me and is too much of a pussy to ever respond to any of my posts, but for the benefit of everybody else who reads his drivel, or any of the other SCIENCE! fanbois, note that none of them responded to this:
With apologies to Defleckshun and every other brainwashed leftist imbecile out there, I don't believe these people BECAUSE THEY'VE ALWAYS BEEN WRONG. First it was a new ice age. Then it was global warming. Now it's climate change, because they keep getting drilled in the ass by trying to pin down extremes. So "climate change," much like Defleckshun on date night, can go either way.
When some quack predicted that the ice cap would melt a decade ago, but it didn't, is that SCIENCE?  |
Since you're going to double down, I'll respond.
You say the climate has always changed. Well how exactly do you claim to know that? It's because you're using the same science that you claim is bunk, to try and prove this other science in bunk. This happens frequently with climate change denial. Simultaneous claims that we can't know the climate in the distant past, supported by claims that it's proven that climate has changed in the distant past.
The Sahara was once lush and fertile. Yes, that's true. It's an example of how drastically climate can change over time. Deniers will also use lines like this, without understanding that the Sahara is proof that climate can be unstable and completely change from fertile to barren.
Regarding claims that ice caps would melt, and the world would flood. Can you list any of the sources of those quotes? Of course you can't, because that doesn't matter to you. Do you know the number of scientists who predicted the end of the world, compared to the number of scientists who support climate change but refrain from fear mongering sensationalism? No you don't, because you only care about the individual opinion that you agree with and you choose to ignore the overwhelming consensus. If you actually looked into the subject, you'd find that your talking points all came from moron politicians with no understanding of the science. How about that claim that ice caps would melt? Did you know that you've gotten that one wrong in multiple ways? First, it wasn't a scientist who said it. It was Al Gore. Second, he didn't even say they'd melt completely he was only talking about summer melt. I challenge you to find a single actual climate scientist who made such claims.
You claim that scientists are heavily compensated shills. OK, then who's paying them? Have you thought about that at all? Where's that magical money coming from and how are they making their millions? Are they making money by taxing people or businesses with carbon taxes? Nope. Are there huge climate change corporations reporting record profits? Nope. So where's all this slush money coming from? The government? Nope. Funding for climate change study has actually decreased over the last decade. As well as government subsidies for it. As this shows, renewable energy subsidies have been declining for over a decade:
So tell me who's making these magical profits from climate change? Can you name a single climate change scientist who's a millionaire? A single one?