|
Direck pretending that discussion of the corruption occasioned by climate science alarmism is conspiracy not science, and therefore derogated rhetoric.
Pretending that the argument is purely about existence or nonexistence of human impacy.
The issues are gravity, immediacy, and the form of solutions.
The arguments use the ambiguity of the concept of 'consensus of human impact' to Trojan Horse the vast slate of authoritarian solutions.
|