Quote:
Originally Posted by staylor26
It blows my mind how narratives work.
The narrative form day one was Tyreek was guilty. The narrative the second this news broke was that it was a cash grab simply because of timing and the fact that it’s a civil suit.
People make up their minds so ****ing quickly.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RunKC
Because Tyreek Hill plead guilty to punching and choking his pregnant gf.
|
But that's not the dispositive angle, at least for me.
The dispositive angle here is an accuser, who will have to either prove or live with the failure to prove her allegations.
Tyreek's choronology was; child broke arm, fixed without incident, then people made noise about suspicions and chid services looked into the matter, . . . the noise started with anyone and everyone 'connecting the dots' and 'coming to obvious conclusions.' What was absent was an actual accusation from either the GF or the child.
AB's situation has someone putting in writing, filed with the court, a series of allegations, and AB's pre-existing correspondance corroborating the gist of the events, but with a different narrative regarding consent.
Tyreek's 'history' is just a dot to connect in a web of inferences. It's relevance is not established and the gravity of it remains to be seen.