Quote:
Originally Posted by RunKC
OL was worse when Charles was in this offense. Didn’t matter.
OL was roughly the same when Hunt was in this offense. Wasn’t a problem.
There’s your answer
|
Here's my problem with this kind of reasoning, though. The same can be done for the other side.
The Chiefs were a much more effective rushing team the 2nd half of 2015 than they were in the first half. The first few games featured spot starts from Fulton and Jah Reid, and Mitch Morse was just a rookie who had played OT at Mizzou just the previous year. Keep in mind we went into that season thinking that Ben Grubbs was going to solidify the LG position, and we abruptly cut him during the season when we realized he was a broke dick by that point. The OL was in shambles, and the Chiefs went 1-5 to start the year.
They were a much more effective running team in the second half because the line gelled together. Andy had a grand experiment of trying out Zach Fulton at C in the preseason, and that's what started him down the path of earning that huge contract from Houston. Largely because he was really freaking good when he started for Morse, who, if I remember correctly, was playing through an injury before he went on IR.
Great OL plus bad RB doesn't work. Great OL plus average RB is usually pretty good. Average OL plus great RB is usually great (like it was with Kareem Hunt). Bad OL plus great RB usually depends on the situation, but it's typically a recipe for an unreliable running game that's okay against bad defenses and horrible against great defenses.
And then you add in the wrinkle that we have Andy freaking Reid. His offenses, especially Mahomes, no matter how you slice it, will always pass to set up the run and not the other way around.