Quote:
Originally Posted by tyecopeland
Have you listened to yourself in this thread? You sound like windhorst. He claimed the game 5 win was a "checkbook win" because most teams can't afford their 4th best player to be a $30 million per year guy then turned around and said the Celtics are the better team. Similarly you are saying Curry can't complain about the roster but have been talking about how the Warriors aren't actually that good behind Curry. Which is it?
|
I don't know about a "checkbook win," but the Warriors have the highest payroll in the league and their ability to spend has allowed them to keep the players around that will appease Curry. We're not exactly talking about a "Mo Williams as a #2 in Cleveland" situation here. It's one of the greatest dynasties in NBA history, what is he supposed to be unhappy about?
The fact that Draymond and Klay have now age declined to the point that Wiggins is better than them doesn't mean that they didn't used to be great players worth that money or that they still can't significantly contribute to a championship right now (which they are doing, particularly given their own basketball intelligence and the Celtics' inexperience and propensity to choke under pressure).