Quote:
Originally Posted by htismaqe
Without any human cause. The Sahara was the Sahara before the common era, before industrialization and pollution.
Therein lies the problem. We have ample evidence of climate change in the absence of human byproducts.
Why then is it so important to blame humans for causing drastic climate change, even though they didn't cause the Ice Age, the Yucatan extinction, or the Sahara Desert?
Oh that's right, because if man is causing them then man can be regulated and controlled into NOT causing them. That's the ONLY reason and you know it.
|
When you get down to it, the human cause is irrelevant. If our climate is going through rapid change, we need to adapt regardless of the cause. Because even though humans didn't cause the Ice Age, or the Yucatan extinction, those events still killed off a huge number of species and completely changed the landscape. That kind of thing would be really bad for us now regardless of cause.
Even if we knew for certain that humans weren't causing any of it, that wouldn't mean we shouldn't do anything. You say the only reason is to make money. Well that's some selfish bullshit. Our climate is very clearly changing. Regardless of cause, we need to adapt. The scientific understanding of it is much greater than you think. And your claims of climate change funding scams are way off. I really recommend looking into the subject further and understanding how scientific funding and grants work. What you're claiming about funding and motivation is stuff straight from denial sites.