Cannibalism - pro or anti?
I'm working late tonight, so I thought I'd reprise my only post that was ever banned back on the old KC Star BB. It was deleted before I could get a proper vote.
Here's the scenario: You're trapped in a wagon train/plane crash/Milwaukee apartment with no sources of food whatsoever. However, a few dead fellow pioneers/soccer players/bar patrons are lying about, with expiration dates that are still good. Assume that you have a 33 percent chance of surviving until the St. Bernards arrive if you DON'T barbecue the ol' gang, and a 66 percent of surviving if you partake of Sapiens stew. What's your choice? |
For survival only, yes. But I would certainly hope I had a way to cook the meat first, don't think I could do it otherwise (as if I could do it to begin with).
|
I wouldn't eat another human, but if I'm in a situation where it'd have to be done to survive..........it'll turn into a Donner "Dinner" Party
|
Quote:
|
Trapped in the wilderness and no food?
First one who sleeps, loses. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
:LOL: |
EAT ME !
|
Quote:
Although I'd likely start with whoever I like THE LEAST. :evil: |
Quote:
Like as in flavor, or like as in personality? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Soccor player might be kind of tough and stringy. Probably best to use him in a stew.
The Milwaukee people, if beer fed, may be quite rich like Kobe steaks. However, if they had filled their bodies with unnatural supplements and hormones, I might put them lower on the list. A meat and potatoes cornfed midwesterner stranded in the mountains would probably be good. You know, I just don't like going hungry. |
Boil 'em like a rabbit! I wonder if the fat comes off with the skin like on rabbits........
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:13 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.