For anyone saying TE, please name which TE groups in the league you would take over the Chiefs.

I'll help you start...Eagles.

Gotta get Tua somehow.

If we lose Kelce we are ****ed. If we lose Breeland it is not nearly as bad. If we lose Hitchens it is not nearly as bad.
The OP question was about the Position GROUP.


Sent from my SM-S906L using Tapatalk

That's stupid. It's like saying QB is one of the weakest position group because our backups suck when you have the MVP of the league as QB.

No because an injury to any franchise QB is on a different level than any other position group. That is not comparing apples to apples.

Sent from my SM-S906L using Tapatalk

Of course, they’re not the same at all. You see the Chiefs run a lot of 2 or 3 QB sets?

Can you name which TE groups you would take over the Chiefs'?

Jesus that is a non starter. Another teams anything is not the point of the thread. Try to stay on point.

Sent from my SM-S906L using Tapatalk

I don’t think that was the question.

I can maybe name 20 LBs groups I like better than the Chiefs.

I can maybe name 20 CB groups I like better than the Chiefs.

I couldn't name 5 TE groups I like better than the Chiefs.

Can you figure out the difference?

Question is not what's the weakest group behind the starting best player.

The Chiefs are good at TE. They are not at LB and especially at CB.

Nice to see you still dont properly understand the OP. It is not about other teams and their players. This is about the Chiefs ONLY.


Sent from my SM-S906L using Tapatalk

Do they run a lot of 2 te sets?

These are the correct answers.

The Chiefs seem to. Hell, against the Gals a couple weeks ago, 6 of their first 11 plays were in double TE.

It’s not about making it about other teams. It’s a reference point. Let’s say Veach was gifted a magic wish to swap out one of his position groups with anyone else’s in the league. Which do you think he would swap? If you say TE, your ****ing high(I mean that respectfully).