Quote:
|
Quote:
Berry was first team all pro three times. Chancellor only made second team twice. If I’m building a team, yeah I might take Chancellor. Based on pure accolades in the decade, I probably choose Berry. |
Those running backs suck
|
I think I would take Reid over Carrol for coaches, but I might be a homer.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Pete is 100-60 in the regular season to Reid's 99-61; virtually a wash so you go to playoff performance. Carrol is 10-7 w/ 2 conference championships and a SB in 8 playoff seasons while Reid is 5-6 w/ 1 conference championship and a SB in 7 playoff appearances. The Seahawks were in slightly better shape than the Chiefs when Carrol got there, but they weren't a safe bet by any means. I think Reid's a safer bet going forward and the guy I'd rather have right this very minute, but a rearview mirror analysis of the last decade says that Carrol has a slightly stronger case. Reid comes in a safe 3rd, IMO, especially with Sean Payton's SB coming in the 2009 season (and his suspension being in this one). Harbaugh maybe in the running but apart from that 2012 run he's really done very little. The Ravens haven't won a playoff game since 2014 so that's gotta hold him back. There really isn't much of a conversation after 3rd, IMO. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
When the AFL merged with the NFL that was it. When the All Time AFL team was announced the Chiefs Fred Arbansas was the TE. If we never played another football season Chiefs TE Tony Gonzalez would be the All Time TE.
Point...Chiefs have had some TE's |
Berry? Like Eric Berry?
|
Everyone forgetting about Chiefs legend Darrelle Revis.
|
Quote:
|
I'm actually kind of shocked that Kelce wasn't a unanimous vote.
I get that Gronk is going to be the #1 choice for 100 out of 100 voters, but Kelce's only competition was Greg Olsen who peaked just a hair earlier (and came into the league waaayyy earlier). Kelce's peak was higher, it lasted longer, he's more explosive, Super Bowl champion, etc. Olsen only had four seasons with over 1,000 yards this decade and he played in every season. Kelce only played from 2014 and onward. The only thing I can say about Olsen over Kelce is that Kelce fumbles a lot more, but I'd say it's a fair trade-off for the extra yards, TDs and consistency. |
McCoy over Charles?
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:11 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.