ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Poop The broncos suck and they traded for teddy bridgewater (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=338072)

TribalElder 04-28-2021 11:52 AM

The broncos suck and they traded for teddy bridgewater
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">The <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Panthers?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Panthers</a> are trading QB Teddy Bridgewater to the <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Broncos?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Broncos</a> for a sixth-round draft pick, per source.</p>&mdash; Tom Pelissero (@TomPelissero) <a href="https://twitter.com/TomPelissero/status/1387463933250838535?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 28, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

-King- 04-28-2021 11:53 AM

Lolwut

The Franchise 04-28-2021 11:54 AM

Not a bad trade for Denver. Doesn’t cost shit and you can see if he’ll do anything for you. They didn’t have a chance at a top QB.

Pablo 04-28-2021 11:54 AM

Lol what a pathetic failure of a franchise.

Clyde Frog 04-28-2021 11:55 AM

Overpayed hahaha

https://media2.giphy.com/media/tUuRmfRVu6ry8/giphy.gif


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

MAHOMO 4 LIFE! 04-28-2021 11:55 AM

Panthers will pay Teddy 7 mil while Broncos pay him 3 mil

vailpass 04-28-2021 11:55 AM

JFC

htismaqe 04-28-2021 11:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 15648368)
Not a bad trade for Denver. Doesn’t cost shit and you can see if he’ll do anything for you. They didn’t have a chance at a top QB.

They didn't?

If the 49ers take Jones, they're in a prime position to go get Lance if they can find a trading partner.

Maybe this signals that teams ahead of them in the draft order are turning down trade offers?

The Franchise 04-28-2021 11:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 15648378)
They didn't?

If the 49ers take Jones, they're in a prime position to go get Lance if they can find a trading partner.

Maybe this signals that teams ahead of them in the draft order are turning down trade offers?

I think it would cost a ton to move up. Maybe they don’t believe in Lance or Fields that much.

MahomesMagic 04-28-2021 11:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 15648378)
They didn't?

If the 49ers take Jones, they're in a prime position to go get Lance if they can find a trading partner.

Maybe this signals that teams ahead of them in the draft order are turning down trade offers?

If Jones goes 3 Atlanta runs to the podium for Lance.

Only Fields will be in play for a trade up, assuming Mac is 3.

htismaqe 04-28-2021 11:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 15648379)
I think it would cost a ton to move up. Maybe they don’t believe in Lance or Fields that much.

Yeah, that's what it says most likely.

They might have been able to get Fields without even trading up.

Pretty much says they didn't like this QB class after Lawrence and Wilson, IMO.

Can't say I would blame them.

htismaqe 04-28-2021 11:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MahomesMagic (Post 15648380)
If Jones goes 3 Atlanta runs to the podium for Lance.

Only Fields will be in play for a trade up, assuming Mac is 3.

Lots of smoke that Atlanta doesn't want to trade down.

Hammock Parties 04-28-2021 11:58 AM

LMAO

I remember when we had Drew Lock and Teddy Bridgewater in KC.

We called them Cassel and Orton.

The Franchise 04-28-2021 11:58 AM

I don’t see Atlanta passing on Pitts.

comochiefsfan 04-28-2021 11:58 AM

Lolololol

Imagine being a fan of such a pathetic franchise.

If you're gonna come at the king you're gonna have to do a lot better than Teddy Bridgewater.

ToxSocks 04-28-2021 12:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 15648377)
JFC

LMAO

htismaqe 04-28-2021 12:00 PM

Of course, there's lots of smoke that Atlanta wants Kyle Pitts too. :shrug:

Rain Man 04-28-2021 12:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 15648368)
Not a bad trade for Denver. Doesn’t cost shit and you can see if he’ll do anything for you. They didn’t have a chance at a top QB.

I hate to admit it, but that's kind of true.

The positive is that he'll be good enough to get them to 7-9 or 8-8 for the next few years.

<iframe src="https://giphy.com/embed/gpmAGuCRHAqFW" width="480" height="320" frameBorder="0" class="giphy-embed" allowFullScreen></iframe><p><a href="https://giphy.com/gifs/mud-gpmAGuCRHAqFW">via GIPHY</a></p>

tredadda 04-28-2021 12:01 PM

Says a lot about what they think of Lock long term.

htismaqe 04-28-2021 12:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 15648386)
I don’t see Atlanta passing on Pitts.

Beat me to it.

Deberg_1990 04-28-2021 12:02 PM

Teddy MediocreWater


Denver now reminds me of the 2007 to 2012 Chiefs

Hammock Parties 04-28-2021 12:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 15648399)
Teddy MediocreWater


Denver now reminds me of the 2007 to 2012 Chiefs

Teddy BridgeUnderTroubledWater

ToxSocks 04-28-2021 12:03 PM

It's not a bad move TBH.

Now you have an insurance plan if Lock can't get his shit together. And i don't think Lance or Fields will ever develop into "the guy" anyway.

MahomesMagic 04-28-2021 12:04 PM

Drew Lock > Rag Arm Teddy

Raiderhater 04-28-2021 12:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 15648377)
JFC

:D

ptlyon 04-28-2021 12:05 PM

Always felt bad for Bridgewater. Was playing well for MN and that injury really f'd him and they got rid of him like a used condom.

Really feel sorry for him now.

Titty Meat 04-28-2021 12:05 PM

Good trade for Denver. They are going to draft Parsons too. Parsons,Chubb,Miller is a hell of a combo.

stumppy 04-28-2021 12:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 15648377)
JFC

ROFLLMAOROFL

RedinTexas 04-28-2021 12:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MahomesMagic (Post 15648405)
Drew Lock > Rag Arm Teddy

Yes, and on a scale of 1-100, 2>1.

stumppy 04-28-2021 12:08 PM

Teddy Tapwater, generic QB.

KCUnited 04-28-2021 12:09 PM

Teddy Bridge to Twoandfifteenia

htismaqe 04-28-2021 12:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Titty Meat (Post 15648411)
Good trade for Denver. They are going to draft Parsons too. Parsons,Chubb,Miller is a hell of a combo.

Depends on whether or not the Lions can trade down. The Lions are also high on Parsons.

Kiimo 04-28-2021 12:09 PM

Just in case you think Denver is the stupid one, check this out



<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Paying Teddy Bridgewater $33M in guaranteed money to start him ahead of Will Grier cost Carolina Trevor Lawrence/Zach Wilson. <br><br>They&#39;ve since traded a second-rounder for Sam Darnold and will pay Teddy $17M this year to play for the Broncos.</p>&mdash; Austin Gayle (@PFF_AustinGayle) <a href="https://twitter.com/PFF_AustinGayle/status/1387467126747848704?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 28, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

RealSNR 04-28-2021 12:10 PM

Knowmo Jr: "Mom, I want a 1st round franchise QB!"

Knowmo's mom: "We have a 1st round franchise QB at home, dear."

First round franchise QB:

htismaqe 04-28-2021 12:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MahomesMagic (Post 15648405)
Drew Lock > Rag Arm Teddy

Depends.

If they wanna play Martyball with that defense and Melvin Gordon, Bridgewater is probably the guy that's going to better avoid the killer TO's.

RunKC 04-28-2021 12:12 PM

Translation: we don’t believe in Lock and he’s not my guy and we have no idea if we’re going to be able to get a QB we want tomorrow so we need insurance.

If they do get a QB tomorrow he’s gonna sit and they’ll be competitive with Teddy

ToxSocks 04-28-2021 12:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 15648377)
JFC

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 15648436)
Translation: we don’t believe in Lock and he’s not my guy and we have no idea if we’re going to be able to get a QB we want tomorrow so we need insurance.

If they do get a QB tomorrow he’s gonna sit and they’ll be competitive with Teddy

They're not getting a QB tomorrow.

This pretty much cements that. I'd say they have a pretty good idea that they aren't getting one.

Hence the trade.

TimeForWasp 04-28-2021 12:14 PM

Like a Bridgwater over troubled Denver.


<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/WrcwRt6J32o" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Red Dawg 04-28-2021 12:15 PM

Dear Lord. Donkey fans are fugged. Teddy is the definition of non play maker.

RealSNR 04-28-2021 12:15 PM

Teddy is discount Alex Smith.

Kiimo 04-28-2021 12:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 15648437)
They're not getting a QB tomorrow.

This pretty much cements that. I'd say they have a pretty good idea that they aren't getting one.

Hence the trade.



I don't think this affects their draft at all

htismaqe 04-28-2021 12:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 15648437)
They're not getting a QB tomorrow.

This pretty much cements that. I'd say they have a pretty good idea that they aren't getting one.

Hence the trade.

Yep. Probably signals that they either don't think they can get one or the one they can get, they simply don't like.

RunKC 04-28-2021 12:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 15648437)
They're not getting a QB tomorrow.

This pretty much cements that. I'd say they have a pretty good idea that they aren't getting one.

Hence the trade.

Trey Lance has very little experience but good potential. He’s the most likely option they have if Mac Jones is taken at 3 and Fields gets taken before them by trade up. It would be stupid to throw him out there early.

Their GM drafted Teddy and he’s an average/slightly below average QB so this move makes sense

htismaqe 04-28-2021 12:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 15648456)
Trey Lance has very little experience but good potential. He’s the most likely option they have if Mac Jones is taken at 3 and Fields gets taken before them by trade up. It would be stupid to throw him out there early.

Their GM drafted Teddy and he’s an average/slightly below average QB so this move makes sense

He's honestly not any better than Lock. Maybe a FEW less turnovers but he also won't push the ball down the field.

If all they need to do was bridge a year to get to Lance, they didn't even need Bridgewater.

ToxSocks 04-28-2021 12:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kiimosabi (Post 15648451)
I don't think this affects their draft at all

I think it tells you they aren't going for a QB.

Most teams don't carry 3 active Qb's. You already have your guy with potential on the roster.

They're not going to just outright cut Lock, and they're not gonna have a 1st round Qb inactive on game days.

GoForIt 04-28-2021 12:22 PM

Adam Schefter
Panthers are trading to QB Teddy Bridgewater to the Broncos for a sixth-round pick, as
@TomPelissero
reported.

Panthers paying Bridgewater $7 million, Broncos paying him $3 million, per source.

Trade does not take Denver out of QB market Thursday night, per source.

https://twitter.com/AdamSchefter/sta...65026735325189

ToxSocks 04-28-2021 12:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 15648460)

If all they need to do was bridge a year to get to Lance, they didn't even need Bridgewater.

Right.

In the rookie QB scenario, Lock IS the bridge.

In this scenario, Lock is the "rookie" QB and Bridgewater is the insurance plan.

ToxSocks 04-28-2021 12:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoForIt (Post 15648467)

Trade does not take Denver out of QB market Thursday night, per source.

https://twitter.com/AdamSchefter/sta...65026735325189

I'm sure that's what the media wants you to think to keep you engaged and watching.

But the writing is on the wall.

Rainbarrel 04-28-2021 12:27 PM

Broken leg horse, what could go wrong.

RunKC 04-28-2021 12:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 15648460)
He's honestly not any better than Lock. Maybe a FEW less turnovers but he also won't push the ball down the field.

If all they need to do was bridge a year to get to Lance, they didn't even need Bridgewater.

Teddy is way better than Lock. It’s really not even close.

Lock has been injury prone, a turnover machine and arguably a bottom 5 QB last year.

Teddy is nothing special but he’s competent and has done a decent job on talented offenses the last 2 years.

He’s pretty much a stabilizer like Alex was for us in 2013

Fish 04-28-2021 12:30 PM

Boy, Elway sure has an eye for quarterbacks!

493rd 04-28-2021 12:35 PM

Good trade for Denver getting him for a 6th.

Kiimo 04-28-2021 12:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 15648461)
I think it tells you they aren't going for a QB.

Most teams don't carry 3 active Qb's. You already have your guy with potential on the roster.

They're not going to just outright cut Lock, and they're not gonna have a 1st round Qb inactive on game days.



I disagree. I think it shows they don't trust Lock to be the Alex Smith to Lance if they can get him.

I guess we'll see though

wazu 04-28-2021 12:44 PM

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-partner="tweetdeck"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Teddy Bridgewater has been traded twice in his career and both times were because of Sam Darnold.<br><br>2018: <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Jets?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Jets</a> trade Bridgewater in training camp after using No. 3 overall pick on Darnold.<br><br>2021: <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Panthers?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Panthers</a> trade Bridgewater after acquiring Darnold from the <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Jets?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Jets</a>.</p>&mdash; NFL Update (@MySportsUpdate) <a href="https://twitter.com/MySportsUpdate/status/1387472195857887237?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 28, 2021</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Mile High Mania 04-28-2021 12:46 PM

Nothing too glamorous... not a bad price to pay for 2021. Beyond that, who knows and they're still in play for a QB depending on what falls their way. Not a game changer, but at least they're not paying out the nose.

wazu 04-28-2021 12:46 PM

Now there are 2 lockers in the NFL where Teddy's name has been scratched out and Darnold written over it.

Mama Hip Rockets 04-28-2021 12:48 PM

That'll get 'em over the Patrick Mahomes hump.

In58men 04-28-2021 12:48 PM

Elway has been throwing shit against the wall ever since Manning left, he’s hoping something will eventually stick.

Let’s not forget when he signed Flacco, he said he was still in his prime ROFL.

DaFace 04-28-2021 12:49 PM

I mean, it's not a bad move given the draft pick and salary. But man, I don't miss constantly fishing for the next mediocre QB to disappoint us.

htismaqe 04-28-2021 12:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 15648480)
Teddy is way better than Lock. It’s really not even close.

Lock has been injury prone, a turnover machine and arguably a bottom 5 QB last year.

Teddy is nothing special but he’s competent and has done a decent job on talented offenses the last 2 years.

He’s pretty much a stabilizer like Alex was for us in 2013

Lock had 16 TD's and 15 INT's last year. Bridgewater had 15 TD's and 11 INT's.

The real reason to go with Bridgewater is to limit the turnovers but when not surrounded by top-tier talent like he had with the Saints, he doesn't do that.

I mean, in his 2 reasonably healthy years in Minnesota with a decent roster, he had ratings of 88.2 and 85.7. He had QBR's of 54.4 and 57.7. Carolina last year was his highest quality season outside of his stint as the backup in New Orleans and even then, he notched a rating of just 95.7 and a QBR of 64.2.

As bad as Lock was last year, Bridgewater simply isn't that much better.

wazu 04-28-2021 12:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mama Hip Rockets (Post 15648533)
That'll get 'em over the Patrick Mahomes hump.

The Carolina game was actually one of our toughest now that you mention it. We won 33-31. Teddy threw for 310 and 2 TDs. He has the blue print Elway's been looking for to lose close games to us instead of getting blown out.

RealSNR 04-28-2021 12:51 PM

"Sweetie, I asked for a franchise QB. You brought home a glorified backup QB."

"I know, but they were having a close-out sale! You won't believe the deal I got!"

old_geezer 04-28-2021 12:53 PM

Getting Teddy for a 6th is not a bad trade. Looks like they're having trouble trying to trade up so now they wait and hope one of the top 5 QBs fall to them. At least they have Teddy as a backup plan - But I refuse to believe that he is their ultimate goal. Even horseface can't be that brain damaged. LMAO

Mile High Mania 04-28-2021 12:53 PM

Like many ... once the Panthers acquired Darnold, I figured Denver would make a play for Teddy given our new GM. I can't imagine there are many thinking that this move solves their long-term problems.

htismaqe 04-28-2021 12:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kiimosabi (Post 15648499)
I disagree. I think it shows they don't trust Lock to be the Alex Smith to Lance if they can get him.

I guess we'll see though

The problem is this:

Teddy Bridgewater isn't Alex Smith and it's not even close.

Alex Smith in his first year in KC, threw 23 TD's and 7 INT's. In his one year as the bridge for Mahomes, he threw 26 TD's to only 5 TD's.

Outside of last year in New Orleans, Bridgewater just barely clears a ONE to ONE TD to INT ratio for his career as a starter. Bridgewater threw as many INT's last year as the stopgap in Carolina as Alex Smith in 2013 and 2018 COMBINED.

PHOG 04-28-2021 12:54 PM

https://media.tenor.com/images/6b899...26bb/tenor.gif

wazu 04-28-2021 12:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mile High Mania (Post 15648552)
Like many ... once the Panthers acquired Darnold, I figured Denver would make a play for Teddy given our new GM. I can't imagine there are many thinking that this move solves their long-term problems.

Nah, it's just some solid depth at a low cost. The fact that Teddy was a starter last year and is a "name", combined with the ongoing struggles Denver has had at the position just gets everybody all hot and bothered.

ToxSocks 04-28-2021 12:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mile High Mania (Post 15648552)
Like many ... once the Panthers acquired Darnold, I figured Denver would make a play for Teddy given our new GM. I can't imagine there are many thinking that this move solves their long-term problems.

It's an insurance plan this year and a stop gap for next.

It's a good move for a rebuilding team.

It's obviously not a SB contender move. It's not akin to the Rams trading for Stafford.

MMXcalibur 04-28-2021 12:55 PM

Is Bridgewater better than Mahomes? Asking for a Broncos fan.

htismaqe 04-28-2021 12:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 15648559)
It's an insurance plan this year and a stop gap for next.

It's a good move for a rebuilding team.

It's obviously not a SB contender move. It's not akin to the Rams trading for Stafford.

Exactly.

I wouldn't at all be surprised to see Bridgewater as the backup rather than the starter. Lock starts and Bridgewater comes in when he falters. Again.

Mile High Mania 04-28-2021 12:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 15648564)
Exactly.

I wouldn't at all be surprised to see Bridgewater as the backup rather than the starter. Lock starts and Bridgewater comes in when he falters. Again.

https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/denver-b...gewater-14441/

2022 year voided per trade to Denver

6th rounder and $3M for a 1-year option

htismaqe 04-28-2021 01:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mile High Mania (Post 15648570)
https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/denver-b...gewater-14441/

2022 year voided per trade to Denver

6th rounder and $3M for a 1-year option

Interesting. You think he's going to start then? I had not seen that they voided his final year.

RunKC 04-28-2021 01:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 15648542)
Lock had 16 TD's and 15 INT's last year. Bridgewater had 15 TD's and 11 INT's.

The real reason to go with Bridgewater is to limit the turnovers but when not surrounded by top-tier talent like he had with the Saints, he doesn't do that.

I mean, in his 2 reasonably healthy years in Minnesota with a decent roster, he had ratings of 88.2 and 85.7. He had QBR's of 54.4 and 57.7. Carolina last year was his highest quality season outside of his stint as the backup in New Orleans and even then, he notched a rating of just 95.7 and a QBR of 64.2.

As bad as Lock was last year, Bridgewater simply isn't that much better.

There were reports that Paton tried to trade Lock in March. He has no allegiance to him but he does with Teddy seeing as he drafted him.

Teddy is also much better. Not sure that’s arguable.

Teddy was 5th completion %, has just under 4K yards and 5 rushing TD’s.

Lock was a turnover machine and 35th in completion %. He’s wildly inconsistent and Teddy is competent

Sassy Squatch 04-28-2021 01:03 PM

We'Re BrInGiNg In CoMpEtItIoN fOr LoCk

The Franchise 04-28-2021 01:05 PM

The good thing is that even if Lock sucks and they start Teddy.....he’ll be just good enough to make sure they don’t draft high enough to ever get a good QB.

tyecopeland 04-28-2021 01:06 PM

I bet teddy wins if it's an open competition. Not sure they'll go that route though. They might as well do one more year of the lock experiment.

htismaqe 04-28-2021 01:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 15648576)
There were reports that Paton tried to trade Lock in March. He has no allegiance to him but he does with Teddy seeing as he drafted him.

Teddy is also much better. Not sure that’s arguable.

Teddy was 5th completion %, has just under 4K yards and 5 rushing TD’s.

Lock was a turnover machine and 35th in completion %. He’s wildly inconsistent and Teddy is competent

24th in passing TD's and even if you add in the 5 rushing TD's, he had 1 more TD than Lock and only 3 less turnovers.

Completion percentages don't win football games. Scoring and limiting turnovers are the two biggest factors that determine wins and losses. There's a reason Bridgewater's former team is picking AHEAD of Lock's previous team.

Because neither one of them are worth crap.

lawrenceRaider 04-28-2021 01:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kiimosabi (Post 15648425)
Just in case you think Denver is the stupid one, check this out



<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Paying Teddy Bridgewater $33M in guaranteed money to start him ahead of Will Grier cost Carolina Trevor Lawrence/Zach Wilson. <br><br>They&#39;ve since traded a second-rounder for Sam Darnold and will pay Teddy $17M this year to play for the Broncos.</p>&mdash; Austin Gayle (@PFF_AustinGayle) <a href="https://twitter.com/PFF_AustinGayle/status/1387467126747848704?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 28, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Better to cut your losses than cling to a past mistake.

vailpass 04-28-2021 01:11 PM

I'd rather they signed Johnny Football.

TEX 04-28-2021 01:12 PM

ROFLROFLROFLROFLROFLROFLROFLROFLROFLROFLROFLROFLROFLROFLROFLROFLROFLROFLROFLROFL


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:26 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.