ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football Bucs give Mike Evans 5 year, $82.5 million extension (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=314329)

The Franchise 03-09-2018 02:54 PM

Bucs give Mike Evans 5 year, $82.5 million extension
 
Per NFL.com

The Tampa Bay Buccaneers are locking in wide receiver Mike Evans for the long term.

Evans has agreed to a five-year, $82.5 million deal with the Buccaneers, a source informed of the situation told NFL Network Insider Ian Rapoport. It includes $55 million in guarantees and a $16.5 million per-year average.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Buccaneers’ WR Mike Evans agreed to a 5-year, $82.5 million extension that includes $55 million guaranteed, per sources. <br><br>Evans now under contract through 2023 season.</p>&mdash; Adam Schefter (@AdamSchefter) <a href="https://twitter.com/AdamSchefter/status/972212200516431872?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 9, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Hoover 03-09-2018 02:55 PM

k

ToxSocks 03-09-2018 02:56 PM

****in' broke the bank on that contract.

O.city 03-09-2018 02:57 PM

And we’re gonna pay Watkins a similar deal


Yuck

SAUTO 03-09-2018 02:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 13458485)
And we’re gonna pay Watkins a similar deal


Yuck

that sucks if so.

ToxSocks 03-09-2018 02:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 13458485)
And we’re gonna pay Watkins a similar deal


Yuck

Uh...no way in hell.

Pasta Little Brioni 03-09-2018 03:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 13458485)
And we’re gonna pay Watkins a similar deal


Yuck

What are you smoking?

DaneMcCloud 03-09-2018 03:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 13458489)
Uh...no way in hell.

This.

Tyreek? Probably.

Willie Lanier 03-09-2018 03:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 13458492)
This.

Tyreek? Probably.

Yeah, that was my first thought as well, we're going to pay hill more than what evans got in a year or so...

Not necessarily a bad thing but something to keep in mind when everyone is clamoring for high priced FAs

O.city 03-09-2018 03:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pasta Giant Meatball (Post 13458491)
What are you smoking?

Ribs

O.city 03-09-2018 03:10 PM

You guys better hold your nose here in a few days

Hoover 03-09-2018 03:17 PM

I'd have no problem giving Tyreek that deal when the time comes.

Sammy doesn't have the stats in my opinion to warrant that kind of coin.

I think Sammy has a lot of upside, but Evans has caught 117 more balls over their first three years and has seven more TD and 1500 more yards.

Over a three year period thats pretty huge

DaneMcCloud 03-09-2018 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hoover (Post 13458521)
I'd have no problem giving Tyreek that deal when the time comes.

Sammy doesn't have the stats in my opinion to warrant that kind of coin.

I think Sammy has a lot of upside, but Evans has caught 117 more balls over their first three years and has seven more TD and 1500 more yards.

Over a three year period thats pretty huge

If Hill has a huge year in 2018, the Chiefs are probably looking at 5 years, $90 million with at least $55 million guaranteed.

Hoover 03-09-2018 03:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 13458527)
If Hill has a huge year in 2018, the Chiefs are probably looking at 5 years, $90 million with at least $55 million guaranteed.

I agree.

Hill's second season is better than Evans.

wazu 03-09-2018 03:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 13458508)
You guys better hold your nose here in a few days

Are you just being a fatalistic Chiefs fan or did I miss a story somewhere indicating the Chiefs have interest in Watkins?

RunKC 03-09-2018 03:36 PM

Tyreek is going to get $19 million avg a year damn

Buckweath 03-09-2018 04:02 PM

I don't know all about the structure of those contracts but I wonder why you would pay those big bucks for so long when it comes to the WR position. So many WRs slow down around 27-28 years old and then you're stuck paying them big money.

Maclin is a good example of that.

Hill is a great player but his game is a lot about speed and his best years will be the next two to four years. I know we might not have a choice but I wouldn't pay him big money for more than two or three years when his rookie contract expires.

Simply Red 03-09-2018 04:18 PM

seems outlandish to me

Chief Roundup 03-09-2018 04:42 PM

WOW I wonder what kind of a contract Beckham will get? :eek:

SAUTO 03-09-2018 04:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wazu (Post 13458556)
Are you just being a fatalistic Chiefs fan or did I miss a story somewhere indicating the Chiefs have interest in Watkins?

You missed quite a few of them

SAUTO 03-09-2018 04:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup (Post 13458667)
WOW I wonder what kind of a contract Beckham will get? :eek:

6yr 100 million

Al Bundy 03-09-2018 06:26 PM

Decent deal for a catch and fall down receiver.

kysirsoze 03-09-2018 06:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wazu (Post 13458556)
Are you just being a fatalistic Chiefs fan or did I miss a story somewhere indicating the Chiefs have interest in Watkins?

There's definitely rumored interest. Absolutely no indication that it would be for this kind of money, though.

cmh6476 09-10-2023 10:37 AM

Mike Evans isn't going to fix the bucs. But he could fix the Chiefs. Although we probably can't afford him and it doesn't seem the Bucs want to trade him.

Simply Red 09-10-2023 10:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cmh6476 (Post 17099085)
Mike Evans isn't going to fix the bucs. But he could fix the Chiefs. Although we probably can't afford him and it doesn't seem the Bucs want to trade him.


Great I'll look forward to nothing then, thanks for the update

BossChief 09-10-2023 11:00 AM

ROFL

chop 09-10-2023 11:07 AM

I went to overthecap.com to look at his salary and saw that he has a 13m base this year. They also have him listed as having a $0 base salary next year but his bonuses have him having a 12m cap hit next year. I've never seen (or at least noticed) a player that has a $0 base pay and still on a roster.

BWillie 09-10-2023 12:59 PM

He would be my wet dream.

This post is brought to you by Billay.

In58men 02-19-2024 11:46 AM

https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...779b3e6ab1.png


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

RealSNR 02-19-2024 11:53 AM

Guy is kind of a pussy not gonna lie. Don't like him.

ChiTown 02-19-2024 12:01 PM

That dude will be 31 at the start of the '24 season. He's been a phenomenal player and I have no doubt he'll continue to play at a high level for another year or maybe 2, but I struggle buying high on the backend of this guys career. With our other needs, I don't see it.

New World Order 02-19-2024 12:02 PM

Would rather have Chris Jones

RealSNR 02-19-2024 12:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiTown (Post 17409706)
That dude will be 31 at the start of the '24 season. He's been a phenomenal player and I have no doubt he'll continue to play at a high level for another year or maybe 2, but I struggle buying high on the backend of this guys career. With our other needs, I don't see it.

People aren't ****ing getting it. "The Patriots got guys at the back end of their careers all the time!"

Yeah. At deep discounts.

The Chiefs have only ever paid a fair market price for an old guy once during this tenure, and that was Carlos Dunlap. And he was for 1 year.

Let the Bills give this chump a 4 year deal. They love doing that shit. Because they're desperate.

We're not desperate.

Pass.

BWillie 02-19-2024 12:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiTown (Post 17409706)
That dude will be 31 at the start of the '24 season. He's been a phenomenal player and I have no doubt he'll continue to play at a high level for another year or maybe 2, but I struggle buying high on the backend of this guys career. With our other needs, I don't see it.

We need to be good for the rest of Kelces usefulness. After that is our quasi rebuild. Pay Evans or someone like him now. 3peat or bust. This isnt that easy.

RealSNR 02-19-2024 12:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BWillie (Post 17409713)
We need to be good for the rest of Kelces usefulness. After that is our quasi rebuild. Pay Evans or someone like him now. 3peat or bust. This isnt that easy.

Or we could just kind of... y'know...not do that. And still 3peat.

RollChiefsRoll 02-19-2024 12:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RealSNR (Post 17409714)
Or we could just kind of... y'know...not do that. And still 3peat.

MINIMUM 8 PEAT, BOB.

BryanBusby 02-19-2024 12:15 PM

Was gonna ask for this stuff to go to a new thread or something until I saw who bumped and well lol nvm

Megatron96 02-19-2024 12:16 PM

I read that if they (TB) can get him signed before the end of business today, they save something like $7-$10 million for the 2024 cap. So I guess we'll see if Evans wants to be a Buc or not by the end of today.

Hoover 02-19-2024 12:16 PM

Rice's development has really really cooled me desires to see Evans in a Chiefs jersey.

Don't get me wrong, I'd still love to see it. I think he's perfect opposite of Rice. I just don't know if its necessary anyone. The only way this is possible is if we keep Jones and tag and trade Sneed. So a lot needs to happen first, and while I don't see how Tampa Bay can tag him when they are already paying Godwin, but they could keep Evans and cut Godwin, which frankly is what I'd do if I were them. Lot of dead cap, but Evans means way to that team than Godwin does, just don't see how you pay Baker, Godwin AND Evans.

New World Order 02-19-2024 12:19 PM

Paying that much to a 31-year-old seems very unlikely for Bart Vitorach

MahomesMagic 02-19-2024 12:21 PM

It depends on price.

If he is willing to play on what DHop took last year for a 2 year deal or in that ballpark, sure.

If he wants to be paid over 20 I just sign Mooney and move up for Keon Coleman.

Hoover 02-19-2024 12:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by New World Order (Post 17409736)
Paying that much to a 31-year-old seems very unlikely for Bart Vitorach

Chiefs are not spending a dime on the WR room once we cut MVS, so I'd gladly pay a dude like Evan's between 15-18M a year for three years.

Eleazar 02-19-2024 12:25 PM

We need another JuJu-like signing. Someone who's sure-handed and can reliably generate a 1st down on a 3rd down play. Spending a lot of cash or giving more than 2 years to a guy who's on the back side of his career doesn't seem like the right thing to do. If Evans wants to make it work with us then great, but I'd rather sign someone else and spend the savings between Jones and Sneed

New World Order 02-19-2024 12:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eleazar (Post 17409754)
We need another JuJu-like signing. Someone who's sure-handed and can reliably generate a 1st down on a 3rd down play. Spending a lot of cash or giving more than 2 years to a guy who's on the back side of his career doesn't seem like the right thing to do. If Evans wants to make it work with us then great, but I'd rather sign someone else and spend the savings between Jones and Sneed

I think they sign a cost-effective receiver like Tyler Boyd.

O.city 02-19-2024 12:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hoover (Post 17409744)
Chiefs are not spending a dime on the WR room once we cut MVS, so I'd gladly pay a dude like Evan's between 15-18M a year for three years.

I'd.....I'd rather give it to Hollywood Brown as wild as that sounds.

I like Evans, dude is awesome but I also don't think there's a chance in hell he signs for less than 25 per year.

BWillie 02-19-2024 12:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RealSNR (Post 17409714)
Or we could just kind of... y'know...not do that. And still 3peat.

That is how we do it.

Hoover 02-19-2024 12:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eleazar (Post 17409754)
We need another JuJu-like signing. Someone who's sure-handed and can reliably generate a 1st down on a 3rd down play. Spending a lot of cash or giving more than 2 years to a guy who's on the back side of his career doesn't seem like the right thing to do.

JuJu was on the backside of his career if we are being honest.

We need a vet, a pro's pro who isn't going to get 20+ million a year.

I mean hell if Tampa Bay cuts Godwin, I'd take him.

FloridaMan88 02-19-2024 12:28 PM

Seems like Evans is injured a lot, but he’s actually only missed six games due to injury in his nine year career.

FloridaMan88 02-19-2024 12:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hoover (Post 17409760)
JuJu was on the backside of his career if we are being honest.

We need a vet, a pro's pro who isn't going to get 20+ million a year.

I mean hell if Tampa Bay cuts Godwin, I'd take him.

JuJu was 25 years old when the Chiefs signed him.

BWillie 02-19-2024 12:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 17409757)
I'd.....I'd rather give it to Hollywood Brown as wild as that sounds.

I like Evans, dude is awesome but I also don't think there's a chance in hell he signs for less than 25 per year.

How many 31 year old WRs got 25M? I really dont know just wondering.

Whatever Hopkins got...looks like two years 26M. Sign me up.

O.city 02-19-2024 12:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BWillie (Post 17409765)
How many 31 year old WRs got 25M? I really dont know just wondering.

Whatever Hopkins got...looks like two years 26M. Sign me up.

How many Mike Evans hit the market at 31 unencumbered by a tag?

He's gonna get paid. Probably alot.

Hoover 02-19-2024 12:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 17409757)
I'd.....I'd rather give it to Hollywood Brown as wild as that sounds.

I like Evans, dude is awesome but I also don't think there's a chance in hell he signs for less than 25 per year.

And that may be true, but I just don't think Brown is the right guy. Maybe I'm wrong, but the deep threat in KC isn't going to get 100 targets. We are not going to take that many shots per game. Tyreek his final two years was a procession WR because defenses took away the over the top stuff.

I just think if we paid Brown, we are going to be disappointed. Just like we were with Sammy Watkins, and MVS. I'd rather draft and develop another one, and go get a Moody or something at the same price point.

mr. tegu 02-19-2024 12:32 PM

I would like to have him for the right price at 2-3 seasons. Just nothing around the 25 million, so it would probably require him to take a Super Bowl discount. But I kind of doubt he would do that given he has one already. Most likely to me is he wants one last big pay day and I don’t blame him at all.

O.city 02-19-2024 12:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hoover (Post 17409768)
And that may be true, but I just don't think Brown is the right guy. Maybe I'm wrong, but the deep threat in KC isn't going to get 100 targets. We are not going to take that many shots per game. Tyreek his final two years was a procession WR because defenses took away the over the top stuff.

I just think if we paid Brown, we are going to be disappointed. Just like we were with Sammy Watkins, and MVS. I'd rather draft and develop another one, and go get a Moody or something at the same price point.

I think Brown, paired with Rice is a really nice setup. Add another guy that can be a bit of everything if you can, but Brown can do all the stuff that Hill used to do

O.city 02-19-2024 12:32 PM

The deep shots are there. We need someone that can go catch them.

FloridaMan88 02-19-2024 12:33 PM

The Chiefs need to add big play/explosive players to their offense.

Chief Northman 02-19-2024 12:33 PM

Lockett or Ridley imo are the best fits. Lockett likely a cap casualty, and Jags aren’t paying a 2nd rounder to re-sign Ridley.

Ridley a scheme fit playing in Doug P’s system. Will fetch significant $, but still productive and a great offset to Rice. Lockett probably cheaper but not a long term solution. More mileage and not quite as explosive as he once was. Either way, one or the other would be significant upgrades.

BWillie 02-19-2024 12:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 17409767)
How many Mike Evans hit the market at 31 unencumbered by a tag?

He's gonna get paid. Probably alot.

He'll get a 3 year deal yeah? The 3rd year is going to suck. And so what. Kelce will be gone by then. Jones and/or Sneed will be gone.

Win now baby.

3peat or bust.

Go for it.

MahomesMagic 02-19-2024 12:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hoover (Post 17409768)
And that may be true, but I just don't think Brown is the right guy. Maybe I'm wrong, but the deep threat in KC isn't going to get 100 targets. We are not going to take that many shots per game. Tyreek his final two years was a procession WR because defenses took away the over the top stuff.

I just think if we paid Brown, we are going to be disappointed. Just like we were with Sammy Watkins, and MVS. I'd rather draft and develop another one, and go get a Moody or something at the same price point.

I disagree with this. This offense NEEDS vertical threats or you will see what we saw this year, teams coming up and taking away all the space in the short areas.

You want to run Nagy's sideways passes? Get guys that can go over the top and there might be space for those.

Otherwise its a 1 yard gain as 7 guys are waiting.

Bl00dyBizkitz 02-19-2024 12:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by New World Order (Post 17409736)
Paying that much to a 31-year-old seems very unlikely for Bart Vitorach

Brett has definitely avoided big contracts to aging vets. Only exception was Mathieu and Clark when Mahomes was on the rookie contract, and even then id hardly consider those guys as "old".

You can maybe complain about the Taylor contract if you don't like him after this year, but there's no denying Taylor was a young, top 5ish RT at the time of signing him.

Brett's track record tells me he won't be throwing big money at this guy.

ChiTown 02-19-2024 12:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BWillie (Post 17409776)
He'll get a 3 year deal yeah? The 3rd year is going to suck. And so what. Kelce will be gone by then. Jones and/or Sneed will be gone.

Win now baby.

3peat or bust.

Go for it.

I saw a talking head say 4/$96MM. Who knows, but that sort of deal is WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY out of our league, especially for a 31 year old dude.

New World Order 02-19-2024 12:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bl00dyBizkitz (Post 17409785)
Brett has definitely avoided big contracts to aging vets. Only exception was Mathieu and Clark when Mahomes was on the rookie contract, and even then id hardly consider those guys as "old".

You can maybe complain about the Taylor contract if you don't like him after this year, but there's no denying Taylor was a young, top 5ish RT at the time of signing him.

Brett's track record tells me he won't be throwing big money at this guy.

Agreed, but who's this Brett guy?

BWillie 02-19-2024 12:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiTown (Post 17409787)
I saw a talking head say 4/$96MM. Who knows, but that sort of deal is WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY out of our league, especially for a 31 year old dude.

Wouldn't do 4 years but any 3 year deal with Evans and our current situation couldn't be that bad.

mr. tegu 02-19-2024 12:40 PM

Bucs give Mike Evans 5 year, $82.5 million extension
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiTown (Post 17409787)
I saw a talking head say 4/$96MM. Who knows, but that sort of deal is WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY out of our league, especially for a 31 year old dude.


That probably seems about right. Some team with a rookie or second year QB could really use his professionalism, reliability, and abilities to develop and gain confidence. And if you are Evans, who already has a Super Bowl, you are probably taking the last big payday as opposed to really valuing going to a Super Bowl team like the Chiefs.

Hoover 02-19-2024 12:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mr. tegu (Post 17409802)
That probably seems about right. Some team with a rookie or second year QB could really use his professionalism, reliability, and abilities to develop and gain confidence. And if you are Evans, who already has a Super Bowl, you are probably taking the last big payday as opposed to really valuing going to a Super Bowl team like the Chiefs.

Houston

ThyKingdomCome15 02-19-2024 01:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiTown (Post 17409787)
I saw a talking head say 4/$96MM. Who knows, but that sort of deal is WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY out of our league, especially for a 31 year old dude.

At 31 years old that makes no sense for any team.

ChiTown 02-19-2024 01:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hoover (Post 17409825)
Houston

Yep

scho63 02-19-2024 01:24 PM

We want a good receiver seeking their first Super Bowl or even making the playoffs.

I think Veach will find us one at a good price.

Dunerdr 02-19-2024 01:26 PM

It's okay to like Mike and understand that he doesn't make sense for the Chiefs for age and money reasons.

Hoover 02-19-2024 01:33 PM

I think we are going to shop for WR in the discount bin. We are going to get a WR who's cut because the money doesn't make sense any longer with the bonus of it not impacting our comp pick compensation.

Why Not? 02-19-2024 01:44 PM

Evans coming here was/is the pipeist of pipe dreams (for some. I know he’s a great player but I’ve never been super enthralled for whatever reason). We’re gonna shop in the cheaper bin for a chain mover. Deep threat either gonna be cheap Hollywood or Mooney or addressed via draft.

Dunerdr 02-19-2024 01:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Why Not? (Post 17409905)
Evans coming here was/is the pipeist of pipe dreams (for some. I know he’s a great player but I’ve never been super enthralled for whatever reason). We’re gonna shop in the cheaper bin for a chain mover. Deep threat either gonna be cheap Hollywood or Mooney or addressed via draft.

I'm all in the Hollywood boat. Coming back around on Mooney after being down on him for drops after watching some games this year.

ChiTown 02-19-2024 02:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dunerdr (Post 17409908)
I'm all in the Hollywood boat. Coming back around on Mooney after being down on him for drops after watching some games this year.

Hollywood makes some sense for sure, especially if they jettison MVS (which I think is a high likelihood at this point). It appears HB is looking for a 3-4 year $15MM/yr type deal, but a 1-yr "prove it" deal like JuJu is possible as well. That might make more sense for the Chiefs than anything else.

Hoover 02-19-2024 02:11 PM

I'd love Brown on a 1 year deal, but highly doubt he would do that

Megatron96 02-19-2024 02:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hoover (Post 17409768)
And that may be true, but I just don't think Brown is the right guy. Maybe I'm wrong, but the deep threat in KC isn't going to get 100 targets. We are not going to take that many shots per game. Tyreek his final two years was a procession WR because defenses took away the over the top stuff.

I just think if we paid Brown, we are going to be disappointed. Just like we were with Sammy Watkins, and MVS. I'd rather draft and develop another one, and go get a Moody or something at the same price point.



Take the total targets for both MVS/JWat; 97 I believe. We'll just ignore Mecole's 'deep' targets for the time being.

Now, not all of those were 'deep' targets, but if we had a Mike Evans, you could expect around that number of targets for a player like him in this offense. I mean, who really cares how many targets JWat actually gets if we had Mike Evans?

I think it's moot anyway; Evans is going to get at least $25 million/yr, and we can't afford that.

Dunerdr 02-19-2024 02:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiTown (Post 17409934)
Hollywood makes some sense for sure, especially if they jettison MVS (which I think is a high likelihood at this point). It appears HB is looking for a 3-4 year $15MM/yr type deal, but a 1-yr "prove it" deal like JuJu is possible as well. That might make more sense for the Chiefs than anything else.

I'd be willing to secure the MVS role with a much better athlete for a few years. Then dumpster dive on another vet. I've seen Shenault thrown around on a few Chiefs pages and KCcrow made a compelling argument in one of his mocks. Then you take a 1-3 round guy depending on how the board falls.

cdcox 02-19-2024 02:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by In58men (Post 17409687)
https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...779b3e6ab1.png


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Couldn’t start a new thread? None of the stuff from 2018 is remotely relevant anymore.

threebag 02-19-2024 02:34 PM

Mahomes affect?
Or
Mahomes effect?

When we get the cheaps???

Gravedigger 02-19-2024 02:36 PM

We'd have to restructure Pat, let Jones walk, franchise tag Sneed, and then maybe have enough to get Tranquil and another piece or two back of our team with Evans as our WR1. Really just depends on how much he'll drive us for, which if he's leaving Tampa, it's probably not going to be cheap and likely a three year deal.

493rd 02-19-2024 02:36 PM

Pick him up!!!


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:56 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.