Hue Jackson Joins the Fun
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Hue Jackson suggests he was paid extra for losses as Browns head coach. <a href="https://t.co/NZJv37PwkP">https://t.co/NZJv37PwkP</a></p>— ProFootballTalk (@ProFootballTalk) <a href="https://twitter.com/ProFootballTalk/status/1488874084834361349?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 2, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
This is getting spicy. |
He must be loaded then.
|
If owners are bribing their coaches to throw games...they should be stripped of their teams. There needs to be huge investigation - including what aspects of the gambling world could have had this knowledge. It's disgusting.
|
Quote:
|
The man has a Hue Jackson for coming out on this
|
All that will happen is the NFL will send out some edict that if a team is caught tanking games they will forfeit draft picks.
|
Anyone betting on a team in the running for a top 5 draft pick is reeruned.
|
Quote:
I would never put another cent on a Miami or Cleveland game as long as Ross and Haslam were the owners. Serious accountability needs to happen for anyone to be satisfied that this issue is being resolved. |
Quote:
The stupidity never ceases to amaze. |
Stupid Browns ownership… Hue Jackson proved he can easily lose games for free without any extra incentive.
|
Quote:
|
Haley did it too..;)
|
Quote:
For instance. I'm well aware that the house has a slight edge when I'm playing Blackjack. I know that the odds are against me and I choose to play anyway. That's a risk. Now if the house is manipulating the deck or rigging the game further to ensure the dealer always wins, that goes beyond risk and into illegal activity. If I bet on an NFL game that is presented as a legitimate sporting contest, I know I might lose. That's a risk. If the game being played was intentionally rigged without my knowledge though, that's illegal. I didn't have extremely relevant information when my action was taken. I'm sorry but I'm pretty sure a good lawyer would rip your "risk" argument to pieces. |
Quote:
I don't understand how this is surprising. Perhaps the NFL should re-consider just giving the #1 draft pick no matter what to the worst team. It rewards this type of behavior. We routinely see good players benched or "shut down" on 2-12 teams and lack of effort on those squads. This is probably the least surprising news I can imagine. |
The implications of this are pretty massive if true
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:18 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.