|
Quote:
|
What is this board's stupid obsession with Jalen Ramsey?
You'd seriously try to pay that dude what he thinks he's going to get with Mahomes' next contract upcoming AND a need to pay Chris Jones and/or Tyreek? Oh, and we're also paying Frank Clark now. Yeah, you're going to have to make choices, but to invest that shit in ONE elite CB while you could be starting God-knows-what on the opposite side makes the defense VERY vulnerable to tanking into the Packers of the 2010s. The key when Mahomes has his big money is to try to maintain SOME kind of cap flexibility from year to year. We'll never have much cap space at all, but we need to have at least a SMALL amount of flexibility for short term fixes here and there. Even without Ramsey, I don't know if it's possible just to pay and keep the guys we've got. It might not be. We might have to sacrifice Hill or Jones anyway. Paying Mahomes, Clark, Jones, Hill, AND Ramsey? And don't forget Honey Badger, maintaining the OL, and however long Kelce is able to play in this league at an elite level. No. As crazy as this sounds, I'll take my chances with Bashaud Breeland and keep the cap room to spend somewhere else as we need it. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Chiefs had probably the worst safety group in the NFL last season...they now have 3 new ones with Watts returning. They swapped out Scandrick and Nelson...the back-end is essentially new. They were one stop away from being 15-1...and a few terrible 4th quarter calls from being in the SB. |
The Chiefs are a worst team with Ramsey or Peterson and without Hill. I don’t see any argument otherwise.
We didn’t need better corners to win the Super Bowl last season. We needed competent coaching and Ford not lining up offsides. |
Not even Brett Veach is stupid enough to trade Tyreek.
|
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">The Chiefs aren’t interested in trading Tyreek Hill.</p>— Terez A. Paylor (@TerezPaylor) <a href="https://twitter.com/TerezPaylor/status/1165306350873841665?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 24, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
|
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">The Chiefs aren’t interested in trading Tyreek Hill.</p>— Terez A. Paylor (@TerezPaylor) <a href="https://twitter.com/TerezPaylor/status/1165306350873841665?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 24, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
|
Of course they aren’t. It’s crazy talk.
|
Obviously.
Even if the Chiefs were willing, no team is going to break the bank for someone who's (rightly or wrongly) going to fire up a shitstorm from the local SJWs like Tyreek inevitably would. |
Quote:
|
Knock on wood, as long as our CBs stay healthy, we're gonna be just fine. They'll give up yards, they'll give up catches, and they'll give up scores, but I think they're good enough to at least not trip over their own goddamn dicks, even in this new defense.
To be honest, if we could magically add any elite stud at one position on defense, I might actually go with a MLB. Our current starter (whether it's Niemann or Ragland) can't be on the field all three downs, and even when we're only operating out of a base defense, they're not exactly shutting all the shit down that comes their way. I know it's kind of like RB, where you can find LBs practically anywhere, but you still can't have a great defense without great LBs. It's too exploitable. I think that would do more to force offenses to punt than adding a shutdown corner the way our team is currently constructed. |
NFL trade watch
Quote:
He probably messaged someone asking about any interest in trading Hill and got back a gif like this. https://tenor.com/93vm.gif |
Quote:
HELL NO!!!! Hill for the entire Jag defense? I’ll think about it. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:21 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
