Maybe so, but when the vast majority of the members here are complaining about the same guy, I think the mods need to step in at some point.

And I rarely defend the mods here, I just don't think they were left with any choice in this.

No.

No.

Despite what they try to tell you, they are not.

Aren't you supposed to be fighting someone tonight?

:D

Who are they then?

Agreed and also n00b of the year 2014. Let's not forget that guy either

Are you new here?

I was gonna say I only read smart posters like o.city and sauto.

I thought I just started one.


I figured I'd call out the both of you in the interests of fairness

I respect this, but it's not that easy. When he took over a thread, all responses would be in relation to his posts. You couldn't even read a thread if you had him on ignore because everything quoted him. It just got so tiring having to work to avoid him that it wasn't worth coming here anymore.

I'll fight you, bruh.

Let's put it this way. Milkman is one of the top 10 posters on this site, probably overall really, but top 10 in post count too.

If GoChiefs never posts again, at the current pace, milkman will pass GoChiefs in post count in the year 2042.

Well goddammit you make me feel bad forstarting shit now.

Not even close and you know it. The Star Board was banning hundreds A DAY, some 15-20 times a day.

I've never been pro banning, never called for anyone to be banned. Generally, I'm vocally against it if it's up for discussion.

But this one dude has done much more than the petty shit that earned banning at the Star, and it's not happening all that often in the remainder of the community.

This isn't a pro-banning statement. It's an anti-hyperbole statement.