ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   NFL Draft ***2024 NFL Combine Thread*** (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=352515)

RunKC 03-03-2024 12:55 PM

Rock hard

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">One of the biggest and best offensive tackles in <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/NFLDraft?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#NFLDraft</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/UHCougarFB?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@UHCougarFB</a> offensive tackle Patrick Paul <a href="https://twitter.com/PatrickPaul_76?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@PatrickPaul_76</a> official measurements: 6-foot-7 4/8, 331, 36.25 arms, 9 3/8 hands, 86.25 wingspan <a href="https://twitter.com/KPRC2?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@KPRC2</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/NFLCombine2024?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#NFLCombine2024</a></p>&mdash; Aaron Wilson (@AaronWilson_NFL) <a href="https://twitter.com/AaronWilson_NFL/status/1764361239860248793?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 3, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Kramerica 03-03-2024 01:09 PM

I'd love to come out of the draft with a LT of the future. I do feel like there were a number of times that PM2 had plenty of time in the pocket and just couldn't find anywhere to go with the ball, so I'd also love a WR who can consistently create separation. That's not too much to ask, right?

smithandrew051 03-03-2024 01:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 17426413)
Rock hard

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">One of the biggest and best offensive tackles in <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/NFLDraft?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#NFLDraft</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/UHCougarFB?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@UHCougarFB</a> offensive tackle Patrick Paul <a href="https://twitter.com/PatrickPaul_76?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@PatrickPaul_76</a> official measurements: 6-foot-7 4/8, 331, 36.25 arms, 9 3/8 hands, 86.25 wingspan <a href="https://twitter.com/KPRC2?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@KPRC2</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/NFLCombine2024?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#NFLCombine2024</a></p>&mdash; Aaron Wilson (@AaronWilson_NFL) <a href="https://twitter.com/AaronWilson_NFL/status/1764361239860248793?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 3, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

How is his combine “measurement” compared to Chris Jones’s?

Asking for Billay.

tredadda 03-03-2024 01:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BWillie (Post 17426362)
Apparently not. Neither are rated great but Orlando is 66 vs 52. And we paid $80,000,000 for the 52 graded guy.

https://www.pff.com/nfl/players/orlando-brown/46227
https://www.pff.com/nfl/players/jawaan-taylor/41665

I get it, but PFF grades mean nothing. I am not one of those who likes it when it’s positive for a Chiefs player and against it when it’s negative. I take their evaluations with a grain of salt. Taylor got better as the season progressed and the NFL stopped directly targeting him.

tredadda 03-03-2024 01:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nychief (Post 17426401)
There isn't going to be an impact starting tackle available at 32... doesn't mean we won't draft OLine there, but I wouldn't hold my breath for an LT that can step right in. Still think we sign a vet.

I would be curious who. KC was fortunate that Smith who needed a rebound season was available.

Monticore 03-03-2024 01:13 PM

Just grab your top guy at position or need WR /OT/DT if we lose Jones it migh be DT if someone falls sick n e it looks like we can add WR as good ir. Enter than round in RD 2

In58men 03-03-2024 01:15 PM

https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...952d5df17e.png


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

tredadda 03-03-2024 01:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by In58men (Post 17426432)
https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...952d5df17e.png


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Such a stupid rule change if it passes.

ntexascardfan 03-03-2024 01:42 PM

There's one of two things that will happen for us this draft:

1) One of the elite WR falls to us
2) There is a run of receivers in the first and a talent that is usually drafted in the 11-20 range falls to us at 32

This draft couldn't be set up any better for us to grab a player we typically don't available at the end of the first.

Easy 6 03-03-2024 02:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nychief (Post 17426401)
There isn't going to be an impact starting tackle available at 32... doesn't mean we won't draft OLine there, but I wouldn't hold my breath for an LT that can step right in. Still think we sign a vet.

Mekhi Becton

BWillie 03-03-2024 02:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by In58men (Post 17426432)
https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...952d5df17e.png


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Was this a problem or something? Too many people just onside kicking it and winning Bowls

MahomesMagic 03-03-2024 02:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ntexascardfan (Post 17426456)
There's one of two things that will happen for us this draft:

1) One of the elite WR falls to us
2) There is a run of receivers in the first and a talent that is usually drafted in the 11-20 range falls to us at 32

This draft couldn't be set up any better for us to grab a player we typically don't available at the end of the first.

Hopefully we don't go off the board and take a WR of lesser talent at the end of the 1st.

Don't want a CEH this year.

smithandrew051 03-03-2024 02:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MahomesMagic (Post 17426489)
Hopefully we don't go off the board and take a WR of lesser talent at the end of the 1st.

Don't want a CEH this year.

CEH wasn’t a good pick, but I don’t disagree with the philosophy behind it.

The Chiefs zigged when the rest of the league zagged.

They picked their highest rated player at a position of need when no other team picked that same position. They were able to have their pick of any RB.

Now clearly, the Chiefs failed in their evaluation of that player somewhere (or maybe the injuries just ruined what could have been), but I don’t blame the Chiefs for their thought process on that pick.

MahomesMagic 03-03-2024 02:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by smithandrew051 (Post 17426498)
CEH wasn’t a good pick, but I don’t disagree with the philosophy behind it.

The Chiefs zigged when the rest of the league zagged.

They picked their highest rated player at a position of need when no other team picked that same position. They were able to have their pick of any RB.

Now clearly, the Chiefs failed in their evaluation of that player somewhere (or maybe the injuries just ruined what could have been), but I don’t blame the Chiefs for their thought process on that pick.


Was just dumb.

If you want a polished system fit RB do that at the end of the 2nd or beginning go the 3rd.


And let players like Michael Pittman, Tee Higgins, DeAndre Swift, and Jonathan Taylor go by them.

Look at Pittman and Higgins value now.

smithandrew051 03-03-2024 02:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MahomesMagic (Post 17426502)
Was just dumb.

If you want a polished system fit RB do that at the end of the 2nd or beginning go the 3rd.


And let players like Michael Pittman, Tee Higgins, DeAndre Swift, and Jonathan Taylor go by them.

Look at Pittman and Higgins value now.

The pick itself was bad. No defending that part.

I’m just talking about the philosophy behind it. Jonathan Taylor was the clear top running back and would’ve been a Homerun in hindsight.

The Chiefs failed in their evaluation of the running backs, but not their philosophy in taking one.

And I normally hate first round running backs.

MahomesMagic 03-03-2024 02:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by smithandrew051 (Post 17426506)
The pick itself was bad. No defending that part.

I’m just talking about the philosophy behind it. Jonathan Taylor was the clear top running back and would’ve been a Homerun in hindsight.

The Chiefs failed in their evaluation of the running backs, but not their philosophy in taking one.

And I normally hate first round running backs.

You don't just take a RB in round 1.

You only take a RB if you think you have a Breece Hall or something there.

CEH they said reminded them of Brian Westbrook.



:shake:

I didn't hate CEH, actually liked him that draft but there were 3 obvious guys ahead:

I had

Swift(valued the catching so I put him ahead of Taylor for KC)
Taylor
Dobbs


then CEH

BossChief 03-03-2024 04:07 PM

I’ll always kinda wonder how CEHs career would have gone if he never gets hurt against the Saints.

He was looking like a weapon.

duncan_idaho 03-03-2024 04:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 17426573)
I’ll always kinda wonder how CEHs career would have gone if he never gets hurt against the Saints.

He was looking like a weapon.

He didn't have the same stop-start burst after that hip injury, I don't think.

But I think his lack of size AND his inability to outrun LB at this level really mitigated his ability as a receiving back at the NFL level. He was so deadly on angle routes and wheels in college, but it just didn't translate.

I was a Swift guy going into that draft. Still think that would have worked out a little better, though I don't know that it really changes much over the past 4 years.

ChiefsFanatic 03-03-2024 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 17426308)
Elite talent at LT opens up the offense a lot more than an elite WR.

WTF? Yeah, Larry Allen was a BEAST but if I had to pick between Allen and Jerry Rice, I am taking Rice.

If I had to pick between Allen and Randy Moss, I take Moss.

Our QB is Patrick Mahomes. He rarely gets sacked because he has elite pocket awareness. A good to good LT and an elite WR is definitely better than a elite tackle and good WR.

I am not saying that I don't want a stud at LT, but Mahomes isn't Brady. If Brady was our QB, yeah, take the elite tackle.

MahomesMagic 03-03-2024 05:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsFanatic (Post 17426625)
WTF? Yeah, Larry Allen was a BEAST but if I had to pick between Allen and Jerry Rice, I am taking Rice.

If I had to pick between Allen and Randy Moss, I take Moss.

Our QB is Patrick Mahomes. He rarely gets sacked because he has elite pocket awareness. A good to good LT and an elite WR is definitely better than a elite tackle and good WR.

I am not saying that I don't want a stud at LT, but Mahomes isn't Brady. If Brady was our QB, yeah, take the elite tackle.

Yeah, it's nice having a great LT but its kind of overkill with Mahomes.

Just needs someone that will not get beat immediately and that's enough.


Rather have the Elite weapons that get open as Mahomes can create.

Couch-Potato 03-03-2024 05:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by In58men (Post 17426432)
https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...952d5df17e.png


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

What!?

Hawk 03-03-2024 06:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 17425678)
And it means **** all if they can’t ****ing catch the ball. Where have we seen this before?



<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/kkjjeCWOdZw?si=6eyf6GMasEO4e-AE" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen></iframe>


To be fair, he was playing with a broken hand in that game. His hands may not be elite, but they are not as bad as they looked on those two drops.

BigBeauford 03-03-2024 07:52 PM

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">From the Senior Bowl to the Combine, Ricky Pearsall has caught everything thrown his direction. Has aced the pre-draft process. One of my favorite Day 2 WRs in the draft. <br><br>Full Recap➡️: <a href="https://t.co/Tmqg7bUs2M">https://t.co/Tmqg7bUs2M</a> <a href="https://t.co/xPlL6z9P5f">pic.twitter.com/xPlL6z9P5f</a></p>&mdash; Jordan Reid (@Jordan_Reid) <a href="https://twitter.com/Jordan_Reid/status/1764089609976209784?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 3, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

RunKC 03-03-2024 07:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsFanatic (Post 17426625)
WTF? Yeah, Larry Allen was a BEAST but if I had to pick between Allen and Jerry Rice, I am taking Rice.

If I had to pick between Allen and Randy Moss, I take Moss.

Our QB is Patrick Mahomes. He rarely gets sacked because he has elite pocket awareness. A good to good LT and an elite WR is definitely better than a elite tackle and good WR.

I am not saying that I don't want a stud at LT, but Mahomes isn't Brady. If Brady was our QB, yeah, take the elite tackle.

Clay is right. LT comes first. There are good WR’s that come out every year. You’ve seen a George Pickens outside of the first rd. Dell, Rice, Nacua and Reed weren’t first rd picks.

It’s way harder to find a LT long term. If there’s one in play in the 1st rd you take them without blinking

The Franchise 03-03-2024 08:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 17426753)
Clay is right. LT comes first. There are good WR’s that come out every year. You’ve seen a George Pickens outside of the first rd. Dell, Rice, Nacua and Reed weren’t first rd picks.

It’s way harder to find a LT long term. If there’s one in play in the 1st rd you take them without blinking

Yeah...like who? Who is this starting LT that we're going to get at the bottom of the first round?

TwistedChief 03-03-2024 08:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 17426754)
Yeah...like who? Who is this starting LT that we're going to get at the bottom of the first round?

Successful tackles are usually a first half of the first round pick.

WR picks have success in the first couple rounds.

Picking at 32 isn't remotely conducive to finding the LT of the future.

O.city 03-03-2024 08:58 PM

Most tackles taken at the end of the first/second...end up being RT's.

tredadda 03-03-2024 09:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TwistedChief (Post 17426791)
Successful tackles are usually a first half of the first round pick.

WR picks have success in the first couple rounds.

Picking at 32 isn't remotely conducive to finding the LT of the future.

It has to be addressed and hoping for a Donovan Smith to be sitting there in FA waiting for KC to sign so he can rebuild his value is not a feasible long term strategy.

Dunerdr 03-03-2024 09:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 17426794)
Most tackles taken at the end of the first/second...end up being RT's.

But, it’s an unusually good tackle class. Worthy may have just pushed one down a spot. Ideally you do it just like last year.

JPH83 03-03-2024 11:59 PM

There's no elite LT at 32, there's maybe a few guys with significant questions attached to them, and that will need time, a luxury you don't really have with that position. If we have a reasonable shot at a Franklin, Worthy or Mitchell we should take it.

Mecca 03-04-2024 12:08 AM

If you want a starting LT you're talking about trading into the top 15.

Direckshun 03-04-2024 07:44 AM

After watching the entire Combine, you gotta think the Chiefs have Jalyx Hunt circled on their wants list.

What would it take to get him? A 3rd? A 4th?

Red Dawg 03-04-2024 08:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 17426865)
If you want a starting LT you're talking about trading into the top 15.

No you don't.

duncan_idaho 03-04-2024 08:58 AM

Someone has to drop.

There are 4, maybe 5, maybe even 6 QBs that get taken in the first round.

At least five and as many as 8 WRs (Harrison, Nabers, Odunze, Thomas, Mitchell, Worthy, McConkey, Franklin, Coleman).

4-5 CBs (McKinstry, DeJean, Arnold, Wiggins, Mitchell, Fakestraw, Lassiter)

At least 3 OTs (Fashanu, Alt, Mims)

Brock Bowers

That’s, at minimum, 18 players and up to 22 players and we haven’t even touched DE, DT, LB, S, or IOl.

And with guys like Fautanu and Suamaitaia and Guyton and Fuaga, there will be options at T. Or, if all those guys go, options at WR.

It’s a good draft and a deep draft, especially at the positions the Chiefs need most. It’s also a good and deep draft at the positions the chiefs need least (QB, CB).

O.city 03-04-2024 09:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red Dawg (Post 17426975)
No you don't.

If you want a day 1 guy...yeah.

Jerm 03-04-2024 09:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 17426998)
Someone has to drop.

There are 4, maybe 5, maybe even 6 QBs that get taken in the first round.

At least five and as many as 8 WRs (Harrison, Nabers, Odunze, Thomas, Mitchell, Worthy, McConkey, Franklin, Coleman).

4-5 CBs (McKinstry, DeJean, Arnold, Wiggins, Mitchell, Fakestraw, Lassiter)

At least 3 OTs (Fashanu, Alt, Mims)

Brock Bowers

That’s, at minimum, 18 players and up to 22 players and we haven’t even touched DE, DT, LB, S, or IOl.

And with guys like Fautanu and Suamaitaia and Guyton and Fuaga, there will be options at T. Or, if all those guys go, options at WR.

It’s a good draft and a deep draft, especially at the positions the Chiefs need most. It’s also a good and deep draft at the positions the chiefs need least (QB, CB).

If Bowers starts to slide into the mid teens...I'd be awfully curious about trading up for him...

scho63 03-04-2024 09:25 AM

First time I really watched a lot of the combine and thought it was done very well on NFL Network.

Some pretty good stuff. I was most amazed by the wingspan of the Georgia player. Guy can flap his arms and fly.

McConkey's kid looked good.

Some real physical specimens and even some of the non-glory QBs performed well.

O.city 03-04-2024 09:25 AM

Chiefs don't currently have the ammo to trade up

Jerm 03-04-2024 09:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 17427030)
Chiefs don't currently have the ammo to trade up

They will after the Sneed trade...

ntexascardfan 03-04-2024 09:38 AM

Any draft that has 4-6 QBs that could go in the first round is good for us. Players who typically wouldn't make it to the end of the first will be there for us.

We're going to get a quality player at the end of the first. I'm leaning towards not taking a WR in one, unless someone we really love falls to us. I think there's some good quality that will be there for us in the second.

tredadda 03-04-2024 09:44 AM

At the end of the day KC needs a long term solution at LT. They can’t keep bringing in rentals to do it. It is fascinating to read that there are no franchise LTs at the end of the first round so pass on them. Then suggesting that the current solution to the LT problem is to either move a career RT to LT or plug a 3rd rounder there (who isn’t elite due to where he was drafted).

Mahomes is great, but the Christmas Day game against the Raiders should show that despite how good he is, he still needs protection especially on his blind side.

KC can and will upgrade at WR this year through the draft and FA. That’s a position that will upgrade easier than LT.

O.city 03-04-2024 09:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tredadda (Post 17427060)
At the end of the day KC needs a long term solution at LT. They can’t keep bringing in rentals to do it. It is fascinating to read that there are no franchise LTs at the end of the first round so pass on them. Then suggesting that the current solution to the LT problem is to either move a career RT to LT or plug a 3rd rounder there (who isn’t elite due to where he was drafted).

Mahomes is great, but the Christmas Day game against the Raiders should show that despite how good he is, he still needs protection especially on his blind side.

KC can and will upgrade at WR this year through the draft and FA. That’s a position that will upgrade easier than LT.

You're probably gonna have to develop one, trade for one, or trade up.

Just keep taking toolsy guys in the mid rounds and see what happens.

tredadda 03-04-2024 09:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 17427068)
You're probably gonna have to develop one, trade for one, or trade up.

Just keep taking toolsy guys in the mid rounds and see what happens.

Trading for an established LT will be tough without giving up the farm for. Trading up might be possible depending on what they get for Sneed. I would much rather them trade up for a LT and develop him with Morris being a swing tackle as a backup.

RunKC 03-04-2024 09:55 AM

Bills met with WR more than any group at the combine. Yeah they’re definitely going to draft one in the 1st

Dunerdr 03-04-2024 09:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 17427068)
You're probably gonna have to develop one, trade for one, or trade up.

Just keep taking toolsy guys in the mid rounds and see what happens.

I would say this is the draft to move into the 20s to get one. We're going to be picking at 28+ it seems for the foreseeable future. Might as well get one now and cost controlled. Then you have the two positions that are normally top 15 or bust, QB and LT. Normally its a top 15 type pick. This year you may luck out with a top 25 pick for that kind of talent. We've proven two years in a row that we don't have to have a top 5 wr to win. Sign one solid free agent and draft a guy in the second.

Monticore 03-04-2024 10:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jerm (Post 17427041)
They will after the Sneed trade...

We need depth as well I would keep all our pick we had so many rookie starts last few years we are going to lose a bunch of guys. NExt few years

RunKC 03-04-2024 10:19 AM

This is a really good article about why the 40 yard dash should not be the standard at the combine. It doesn’t tell the whole story..

Quote:

Last year, the receiver who ran the 35th-fastest 40-yard dash of his position group also registered the top speed during the gauntlet drill -- a drill in which players are asked to catch passes while running at full speed across the width of the football field.

The Los Angeles Rams decided a player's performance in a more football specific drill was more important than what he ran in the 40-yard dash and spent a fifth-round pick on him.

With 1,486 yards and 105 catches in his rookie season, Puka Nacua proved them right. The NFL's Offensive Rookie of the Year ran a 4.57-second 40-yard dash but hit a top speed of 20.06 miles per hour over the first 40 yards of the gauntlet drill, according to Next Gen Stats. No other prospect registered a speed faster than 19.65.
Cooper Kupp and Kyle Hamilton also guys that ran poor 40 yard dash but had really good play speed via GPS. Kupp got a 20 mph on the gun and Hamilton got 21.

https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/...oming-obsolete

O.city 03-04-2024 10:23 AM

The thing with LT is that it's just not likely a guy without holes is gonna fall. LT is one spot, similar to DE, that the league has figured out for the most part what to look for.

So you're just gonna have to keep cobbling things together best you can.

staylor26 03-04-2024 10:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 17427144)
This is a really good article about why the 40 yard dash should not be the standard at the combine. It doesn’t tell the whole story..



Cooper Kupp and Kyle Hamilton also guys that ran poor 40 yard dash but had really good play speed via GPS. Kupp got a 20 mph on the gun and Hamilton got 21.

https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/...oming-obsolete

This is a Keon Coleman post :D

O.city 03-04-2024 10:23 AM

Keon Coleman does nothing for me. No thanks.

kepp 03-04-2024 10:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by In58men (Post 17426432)
https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...952d5df17e.png


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Declare it in advance? That sucks.

RunKC 03-04-2024 10:28 AM

Troy Franklin too. Guys aren’t running go routes all game. He may be a build up speed guy but he still clocked 20 mph.

He should absolutely be in play here

O.city 03-04-2024 10:31 AM

Guys that build up speed just aren't what Andy and company (right or wrong) look for in WR's.

staylor26 03-04-2024 10:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 17427161)
Keon Coleman does nothing for me. No thanks.

All the more reason to draft him!

RunKC 03-04-2024 10:37 AM

Yup. They need to put this in the combine tracking results

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Player tracking data unlocks the ability to move beyond the forty yard dash and better approximate game speed.<br><br>Puka Nacua reached the fastest speed of any wide receiver during last combine&#39;s gauntlet drill at 20.06 mph.<a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/NFLCombine?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#NFLCombine</a> x <a href="https://twitter.com/nflnetwork?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@nflnetwork</a> <a href="https://t.co/BRu8rjo4eA">pic.twitter.com/BRu8rjo4eA</a></p>&mdash; Next Gen Stats (@NextGenStats) <a href="https://twitter.com/NextGenStats/status/1764037473405947986?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 2, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

kepp 03-04-2024 10:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 17427144)
This is a really good article about why the 40 yard dash should not be the standard at the combine. It doesn’t tell the whole story..



Cooper Kupp and Kyle Hamilton also guys that ran poor 40 yard dash but had really good play speed via GPS. Kupp got a 20 mph on the gun and Hamilton got 21.

https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/...oming-obsolete

I think Tesla acceleration, not Lamborghini top speed, is more valuable. Especially in our offense.

BWillie 03-04-2024 10:45 AM

Why is Bo Nix so far down on QB draft boards? Think he's better than JJ McCarthy. I know this because I've watched about 2 or 3 quarters all year of Michigan and Oregon football and I looked at his ESPN player card online. Expert at this I tell you.

staylor26 03-04-2024 10:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 17427194)
Yup. They need to put this in the combine tracking results

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Player tracking data unlocks the ability to move beyond the forty yard dash and better approximate game speed.<br><br>Puka Nacua reached the fastest speed of any wide receiver during last combine&#39;s gauntlet drill at 20.06 mph.<a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/NFLCombine?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#NFLCombine</a> x <a href="https://twitter.com/nflnetwork?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@nflnetwork</a> <a href="https://t.co/BRu8rjo4eA">pic.twitter.com/BRu8rjo4eA</a></p>&mdash; Next Gen Stats (@NextGenStats) <a href="https://twitter.com/NextGenStats/status/1764037473405947986?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 2, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

And who was this year's fastest?

Keon ****ing Coleman.

ToxSocks 03-04-2024 10:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kepp (Post 17427205)
I think Tesla acceleration, not Lamborghini top speed, is more valuable. Especially in our offense.

I think that's the wrong way to look at things.

Instead, look at it as, "What thing does this player do that's SPECIAL, how special is it, and how can we utilize that special thing?"

I think that's how the Chiefs view things, rather than "we dont like this kind of guy or won't draft that kind of guy etc" .

BWillie 03-04-2024 10:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 17427223)
And who was this year's fastest?

Keon ****ing Coleman.

Yeah I like this gauntlet drill. I'd put those results way way way ahead of the 40 yard dash. It's a better predictor of football speed.

If Keon is the top of that, he would be towards the top of my list.

I want football players. As the great Kenny Powers said, I play real sports, not trying to be the best at working out.

Dunerdr 03-04-2024 10:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 17427157)
The thing with LT is that it's just not likely a guy without holes is gonna fall. LT is one spot, similar to DE, that the league has figured out for the most part what to look for.

So you're just gonna have to keep cobbling things together best you can.

Keep cobbling, pay someone big, trade for someone or use this advantageous draft to get a guy with traits you can bet on. I'd take a hard look at Mims and Guyton if they are there.

Mecca 03-04-2024 10:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 17427223)
And who was this year's fastest?

Keon ****ing Coleman.

Keon looks very very smooth in his drills for a guy his size.

O.city 03-04-2024 10:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dunerdr (Post 17427236)
Keep cobbling, pay someone big, trade for someone or use this advantageous draft to get a guy with traits you can bet on. I'd take a hard look at Mims and Guyton if they are there.

You'd probably have to get to 17or 18.
I dunno what that would cost.

staylor26 03-04-2024 10:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 17427237)
Keon looks very very smooth in his drills for a guy his size.

Assuming Thomas Jr., Worthy, and Mitchell are gone, I'd be happy with him at 32.

Dunerdr 03-04-2024 11:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 17426998)
Someone has to drop.

There are 4, maybe 5, maybe even 6 QBs that get taken in the first round.

At least five and as many as 8 WRs (Harrison, Nabers, Odunze, Thomas, Mitchell, Worthy, McConkey, Franklin, Coleman).

4-5 CBs (McKinstry, DeJean, Arnold, Wiggins, Mitchell, Fakestraw, Lassiter)

At least 3 OTs (Fashanu, Alt, Mims)

Brock Bowers

That’s, at minimum, 18 players and up to 22 players and we haven’t even touched DE, DT, LB, S, or IOl.

And with guys like Fautanu and Suamaitaia and Guyton and Fuaga, there will be options at T. Or, if all those guys go, options at WR.

It’s a good draft and a deep draft, especially at the positions the Chiefs need most. It’s also a good and deep draft at the positions the chiefs need least (QB, CB).

@Ocity. This is where im coming from when i say in the 20s. Theres still several edge rushers, at least one DT and 1 IOL in the first round scrum every year. This is our absolute best chance imo to get the most for the least. Obviously you would have to wait and see how the board falls but I think it would look as favorable as it ever will.

RunKC 03-04-2024 11:13 AM

Spags gonna draft another corner in the mid rds LMAO

Quote:

This is the year to get a nickel corner.

You’ve probably already heard that it’s a great class for offensive linemen (it is utterly amazing) and wide receivers (it’s great, but probably a little gassed at this point). The third position that I think is both rich and deep? Slot cornerback.

The headliner is Michigan’s Mike Sainristil. A two-way player in college who initially landed at Michigan as a receiver, Sainristil switched to defense only in 2022 after the departure of Dax Hill, a first-rounder in that year’s draft selected by the Bengals. At 5-foot-9 and 182 pounds, Sainristil is pretty much limited to the slot on an NFL defense—but he’s quick as a wink, super explosive, and has the ball skills expected of an ex–wide receiver. Only one player ran a quicker short shuttle than Sainristil (4.01 seconds), and he looked smooth as butter in the gauntlet drill.

But even beyond Sainristil, there are some great prospects. Rutgers corner Max Melton, brother of Packers wide receiver Bo Melton, rose over the course of a strong Senior Bowl week and rose again in Indianapolis, where he ran a sub 4.4-second 40-yard dash and jumped over 40 inches. Kentucky’s Andru Phillips hasn’t started much and played primarily on the outside, but his traits translate better to the interior, where his toughness and explosiveness would be welcome. Both Florida State corners, Renardo Green and Jarrian Jones, might be better suited on the interior, as may be the case for Missouri’s Ennis Rakestraw Jr., currently viewed as a late first-round prospect.

If you’re a team with a need at slot corner and you walk out of this draft without a solution, I don’t know what you were looking at
https://www.theringer.com/nfl/2024/3...jr-jj-mccarthy

Mecca 03-04-2024 11:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 17427298)
Spags gonna draft another corner in the mid rds LMAO



https://www.theringer.com/nfl/2024/3...jr-jj-mccarthy

Mike Sainristil, is the guy that I believe Jalen McMillian said he hated playing most of any CB, said dude was calling out their offensive plays before the snap.

RunKC 03-04-2024 01:26 PM

Some team is gonna trade a ****ing haul for JJ McCarthy and I pray to God it’s the Broncos.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">&quot;I had a very smart GM tell me 1-2-3-4&quot; for QBs in the 2024 NFL Draft<br><br>- <a href="https://twitter.com/DMRussini?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@DMRussini</a> <a href="https://t.co/zp5tPYI9jk">https://t.co/zp5tPYI9jk</a> <a href="https://t.co/mcXCWqW8lI">pic.twitter.com/mcXCWqW8lI</a></p>&mdash; Josh Norris (@JoshNorris) <a href="https://twitter.com/JoshNorris/status/1764690614375845943?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 4, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

ROYC75 03-04-2024 01:47 PM

If Bowers somehow dropped to 17,18 range, we gotta somehow move up to grab. Getting Kelce's replacement for him to groom and play along side for the next 2-3 years is an awesome thought!

Jerm 03-04-2024 01:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ROYC75 (Post 17427629)
If Bowers somehow dropped to 17,18 range, we gotta somehow move up to grab. Getting Kelce's replacement for him to groom and play along side for the next 2-3 years is an awesome thought!

If he fell past 12 or 13, I'd seriously start considering it then....

Chris Meck 03-04-2024 01:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ModSocks (Post 17427226)
I think that's the wrong way to look at things.

Instead, look at it as, "What thing does this player do that's SPECIAL, how special is it, and how can we utilize that special thing?"

I think that's how the Chiefs view things, rather than "we dont like this kind of guy or won't draft that kind of guy etc" .

I think that's accurate.

Chris Meck 03-04-2024 01:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ROYC75 (Post 17427629)
If Bowers somehow dropped to 17,18 range, we gotta somehow move up to grab. Getting Kelce's replacement for him to groom and play along side for the next 2-3 years is an awesome thought!

Nobody wants #32, or multiple #30+ picks.

Dunerdr 03-04-2024 02:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 17426998)
Someone has to drop.

There are 4, maybe 5, maybe even 6 QBs that get taken in the first round.

At least five and as many as 8 WRs (Harrison, Nabers, Odunze, Thomas, Mitchell, Worthy, McConkey, Franklin, Coleman).

4-5 CBs (McKinstry, DeJean, Arnold, Wiggins, Mitchell, Fakestraw, Lassiter)

At least 3 OTs (Fashanu, Alt, Mims)

Brock Bowers

That’s, at minimum, 18 players and up to 22 players and we haven’t even touched DE, DT, LB, S, or IOl.

And with guys like Fautanu and Suamaitaia and Guyton and Fuaga, there will be options at T. Or, if all those guys go, options at WR.

It’s a good draft and a deep draft, especially at the positions the Chiefs need most. It’s also a good and deep draft at the positions the chiefs need least (QB, CB).

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jerm (Post 17427631)
If he fell past 12 or 13, I'd seriously start considering it then....

No way I'm trading that high for a tight end.

Monticore 03-04-2024 02:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 17427588)
Some team is gonna trade a ****ing haul for JJ McCarthy and I pray to God it’s the Broncos.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">&quot;I had a very smart GM tell me 1-2-3-4&quot; for QBs in the 2024 NFL Draft<br><br>- <a href="https://twitter.com/DMRussini?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@DMRussini</a> <a href="https://t.co/zp5tPYI9jk">https://t.co/zp5tPYI9jk</a> <a href="https://t.co/mcXCWqW8lI">pic.twitter.com/mcXCWqW8lI</a></p>&mdash; Josh Norris (@JoshNorris) <a href="https://twitter.com/JoshNorris/status/1764690614375845943?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 4, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Harrison drops to the chargers? Great

staylor26 03-04-2024 02:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Monticore (Post 17427670)
Harrison drops to the chargers? Great

I don't see the Cardinals trading back. They already have a shit ton of picks, and they already passed up on top talent to trade down last year.

If anything, the Chargers will trade back from 5 with a team that's looking for a QB. Much more likely.

RunKC 03-04-2024 02:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 17427678)
I don't see the Cardinals trading back. They already have a shit ton of picks, and they already passed up on top talent to trade down last year.

If anything, the Chargers will trade back from 5 with a team that's looking for a QB. Much more likely.

And there’s no way they’re gonna trade with Denver, especially if the QB they want is Harbaugh’s college QB. Perfect LMAO

ChiefsFanatic 03-04-2024 04:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scho63 (Post 17427029)
First time I really watched a lot of the combine and thought it was done very well on NFL Network.

Some pretty good stuff. I was most amazed by the wingspan of the Georgia player. Guy can flap his arms and fly.

McConkey's kid looked good.

Some real physical specimens and even some of the non-glory QBs performed well.

I feel so racist for saying this, so I want to apologize to anyone this may offend, but...

I think the Raiders are going to draft Michael Penix Jr. because he wore a durag during his throwing session. That is the most Raiders thing I have seen at the combine.

I feel like Antonio Pierce was watching from the stands, and probably thinks Penix Jr. is a "real one" and exactly what the Raiders need.

The only thing they could do that would be more Raidery than drafting Penix Jr. at 13 is drafting Xavier Worthy at 13.

BryanBusby 03-04-2024 04:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 17427678)
I don't see the Cardinals trading back. They already have a shit ton of picks, and they already passed up on top talent to trade down last year.

If anything, the Chargers will trade back from 5 with a team that's looking for a QB. Much more likely.

Yeah, they aren't. The Cardinals are completely void of talent and will be staring right at a generational talent at WR.

Ain't no way.

UChieffyBugger 03-04-2024 04:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsFanatic (Post 17427823)
I feel so racist for saying this, so I want to apologize to anyone this may offend, but...

I think the Raiders are going to draft Michael Penix Jr. because he wore a durag during his throwing session. That is the most Raiders thing I have seen at the combine.

I feel like Antonio Pierce was watching from the stands, and probably thinks Penix Jr. is a "real one" and exactly what the Raiders need.

The only thing they could do that would be more Raidery than drafting Penix Jr. at 13 is drafting Xavier Worthy at 13.

Smh why are people so fecking ignorant on this forum? Ugh :rolleyes:

smithandrew051 03-04-2024 04:16 PM

I’d love it if a QB fell to our spot.

When Lamar Jackson fell to 32, the Ravens gave up 52, 125, and their 2nd round pick the following year for 32 and 132.

I wouldn’t hate comp similar to that in this draft. A second rounder in 2025 could be a top 45 pick depending on who we trade with (if they need a QB, then it’s probably a bad team).


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:00 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.