ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Media Center (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Movies and TV The Boys (Amazon) (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=322389)

FlintHillsChiefs 07-25-2020 04:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 007 (Post 15084504)
Holy shit

Holy ****. I laughed so hard I was wheezing!

Otter 07-26-2020 11:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 15081886)
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">A new look at <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/TheBoys?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#TheBoys</a> season 2 has been released <a href="https://t.co/Hk2s6kpnjX">pic.twitter.com/Hk2s6kpnjX</a></p>&mdash; Geek Vibes Nation (@GeekVibesNation) <a href="https://twitter.com/GeekVibesNation/status/1286423658597154818?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 23, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>


NSFW

This may be my favorite series of all time.

BigRedChief 07-27-2020 09:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 15083597)
Agreed.

Amazon isn't an Over-The-Air Free TV network, it's $12.99 per month or $119.00 per year.

This is a ploy on their part to make viewers pay for at least 2 months of Amazon Prime to see the show in "Real Time".

And I'd cancel HBO Max if I was paying more than the $7.50 a month rate I'm getting through Spectrum because it's a shit streamer that offers far less relevant content than either Starz or Showtime, both of which cost $7.50 per month combined.

I’m paying $99 a year for Amazon Prime shipping. I’d pay 4X-5X that a year if Prime didn’t exist. The TV Prime ain’t worth $119 a year as a stand alone product.

Baby Lee 08-04-2020 12:42 PM

Newest - Stormfront, . . . in my pants, . . . amirite?!?!


<iframe width="949" height="534" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/MN8fFM1ZdWo" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Mahomes_Is_God 08-05-2020 01:40 PM

Aya Cash is hawt as fawk

DJ's left nut 08-05-2020 02:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mahomes_Is_God (Post 15101175)
Aya Cash is hawt as fawk

She's always had a bit of a 'lazy' paunch to her that keeps her from being truly hot.

It showed up a season or two into "You're the Worst" - just that typical party girl gut that's not a deal-breaker but keeps her from being a legit smokeshow.

At that point she just looks like a 100 girls you see on your average college campus.

Baby Lee 08-05-2020 02:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 15101239)
She's always had a bit of a 'lazy' paunch to her that keeps her from being truly hot.

It showed up a season or two into "You're the Worst" - just that typical party girl gut that's not a deal-breaker but keeps her from being a legit smokeshow.

At that point she just looks like a 100 girls you see on your average college campus.

For me, there are [at least] two VERY distinct types of hot.

There's hot that erects your genitals, and there's hot that melts your heart.

The former is purely visual, could even just be a part. Boobs, legs, eyes, feet, etc.

Your Gal Godot, prime Pamela Anderson, etc.

The latter is where you can picture yourself holding her purse while she shops and not even minding.

Jenna Fischer is the prototype. Jenny Slate is another. Aya is that kind of hot. 'put up with their moods and nod 'yes honey' hot.'

BigBeauford 08-05-2020 03:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baby Lee (Post 15101288)
For me, there are [at least] two VERY distinct types of hot.

There's hot that erects your genitals, and there's hot that melts your heart.

The former is purely visual, could even just be a part. Boobs, legs, eyes, feet, etc.

Your Gal Godot, prime Pamela Anderson, etc.

The latter is where you can picture yourself holding her purse while she shops and not even minding.

Jenna Fischer is the prototype. Jenny Slate is another. Aya is that kind of hot. 'put up with their moods and nod 'yes honey' hot.'

And then there is the Venn Diagram girl who does both:

https://i.redd.it/7kz77iwiwgd21.jpg

DaneMcCloud 08-05-2020 03:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 15101239)
At that point she just looks like a 100 girls you see on your average college campus.

That's pretty damn good considering college age girls range anywhere from 18-22 years old while Aya Cash is 38.

DJ's left nut 08-05-2020 03:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baby Lee (Post 15101288)
For me, there are [at least] two VERY distinct types of hot.

There's hot that erects your genitals, and there's hot that melts your heart.

The former is purely visual, could even just be a part. Boobs, legs, eyes, feet, etc.

Your Gal Godot, prime Pamela Anderson, etc.

The latter is where you can picture yourself holding her purse while she shops and not even minding.

Jenna Fischer is the prototype. Jenny Slate is another. Aya is that kind of hot. 'put up with their moods and nod 'yes honey' hot.'

Yeah, I see the distinction.

For me that's a simple one - 'hot vs. cute'.

I can see putting cash in the 'cute' category, but not 'hot'.

DJ's left nut 08-05-2020 03:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigBeauford (Post 15101356)
And then there is the Venn Diagram girl who does both:

https://i.redd.it/7kz77iwiwgd21.jpg

And she's funny. And I thought I read she's like insanely smart as well.

Hard to find anything to criticize w/ Milana Vayntrub.

DJ's left nut 08-05-2020 03:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 15101363)
That's pretty damn good considering college age girls range anywhere from 18-22 years old while Aya Cash is 38.

She also makes a living in part on her appearance and has never had kids.

So it's a bit of a wash here. but ultimately if we're gonna say "hot for 38" I'll consider the argument, but the blanket 'hot' statement doesn't allow for a grading curve.

DaneMcCloud 08-05-2020 03:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 15101392)
She also makes a living in part on her appearance and has never had kids.

So it's a bit of a wash here. but ultimately if we're gonna say "hot for 38" I'll consider the argument, but the blanket 'hot' statement doesn't allow for a grading curve.

I'd only say "Hot for 38" when compared to average college girls, most of whom won't look anything like Aya Cash 20 years down the road.

DJ's left nut 08-05-2020 04:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 15101396)
I'd only say "Hot for 38" when compared to average college girls, most of whom won't look anything like Aya Cash 20 years down the road.

No question.

Living in a college town has really driven home for me how difficult it is for women to be unattractive at 21 years old.

Not the case by 30...

DaneMcCloud 08-05-2020 04:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 15101412)
No question.

Living in a college town has really driven home for me how difficult it is for women to be unattractive at 21 years old.

Not the case by 30...

And conversely, my view is warped from living in Hollywood for 27+ years.

For every hot chick you see on TV, there are another 10,000 behind her, waiting to be "discovered".

It's absolutely insane.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:07 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.