Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 15663150)

Yep.

Originally Posted by ClevelandBronco (Post 15663148)

IMHO, Broncos fans should be opposed to the team putting together an offer so generous that the Packers couldn’t refuse it. It’s just a bad bet on a desperate long shot.

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 15663158)

Well if I was a team with a good roster and no QB in a division with Patrick Mahomes, I’d do nearly anything it took to get that guy.

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 15663158)

Well if I was a team with a good roster and no QB in a division with Patrick Mahomes, I’d do nearly anything it took to get that guy.

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 15663151)

FWIW John Clayton said he thinks Aaron has played his last snap in GB

Originally Posted by KCChiefsFan88 (Post 15663144)

He’s 0-4 in NFCCG’s since beating Chicago and their back-up QB in the NFCCG 10 years ago (a game where Aaron Rodgers had a 55.4 QB rating and threw 2 INT’s and 0 TD’s).

His stats in the four championship game losses since then were mostly inflated in garbage time as Green Bay was blown out in two of those games (with Rodgers playing horribly).

In Green Bay’s close championship game losses, Rodgers had a 55.8 QB rating in their OT loss to Seattle and last year despite playing probably his best career championship game he still had a terrible INT in the second half (leading to a Bucs TD).

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 15663209)

It's such a risk, though.

The Broncos did this with Manning and it paid off but that is actually the exception rather than the rule.

Plus, all they paid for Manning was his salary. The Broncos are looking at trading away decent players and possibly 1st round picks that will still be paid after Rodgers is gone.

If I were a Broncos fan, I'd rather not. If it doesn't work, they're looking at another half decade of 5-win seasons.

Originally Posted by ClevelandBronco (Post 15663148)

IMHO, Broncos fans should be opposed to the team putting together an offer so generous that the Packers couldn’t refuse it. It’s just a bad bet on a desperate long shot.

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 15663209)

It's such a risk, though.

The Broncos did this with Manning and it paid off but that is actually the exception rather than the rule.

Plus, all they paid for Manning was his salary. The Broncos are looking at trading away decent players and possibly 1st round picks that will still be paid after Rodgers is gone.

If I were a Broncos fan, I'd rather not. If it doesn't work, they're looking at another half decade of 5-win seasons.

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 15663236)

I would have drafted Justin Fields, but I don’t see the downside to trading for Rodgers. You automatically become the 2nd best team in the AFC with a real shot at a Super Bowl.

You also have the guys at a high level for at least 5 more years IMO. Rodgers didn’t have a piddly arm when he was drafted. He had a rifle. And he didn’t have neck surgery like Manning.

I think he lasts well into his early 40’s.

Originally Posted by ChiefsFanatic (Post 15663212)

I have listened to Rodgers on Pat Mcafee several times, and he is a different kind of person. I think if Aaron Rodgers says he won't play for Green Bay, he won't play for them period, even if it's out of stubbornness or spite.



Sent from my GM1915 using Tapatalk

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 15663244)

If they have to trade away key pieces of that offense to get Rodgers, they're actually hurting their chances of being a contender.

If Rodgers were a free agent, it would be a no-brainer.

The potential price tag is simply too steep.

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 15663244)

If they have to trade away key pieces of that offense to get Rodgers, they're actually hurting their chances of being a contender.

If Rodgers were a free agent, it would be a no-brainer.

The potential price tag is simply too steep.

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 15662928)

GoForIt is a troll. That was just an attempt to suck Brady’s dick some more.

Originally Posted by KCChiefsFan88 (Post 15663144)

He’s 0-4 in NFCCG’s since beating Chicago and their back-up QB in the NFCCG 10 years ago (a game where Aaron Rodgers had a 55.4 QB rating and threw 2 INT’s and 0 TD’s).

His stats in the four championship game losses since then were mostly inflated in garbage time as Green Bay was blown out in two of those games (with Rodgers playing horribly).

In Green Bay’s close championship game losses, Rodgers had a 55.8 QB rating in their OT loss to Seattle and last year despite playing probably his best career championship game he still had a terrible INT in the second half (leading to a Bucs TD).

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 15663251)

So settle for a strong roster and no QB winning maybe 8 games or a pretty good roster with a HOF QB as a real SB threat.

What?

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 15663258)

If they have to give up 3 first round picks and 1 or 2 of their offensive playmakers, they aren't a real SB threat. Just look at Rodgers in Green Bay.

That's the issue.