ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Media Center (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Movies and TV Better Call Saul (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=277119)

DaneMcCloud 01-01-2016 12:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baby Lee (Post 11988706)
We're clearly at an impasse, but the process is driven by the creation of the script.

If scripts were called for quicker and funded, they would show up quicker and more personnel would be recruited for the DETAILS of locations, production, casting, sets and editing. And the ****ING ACTORS would be there to perform as well.

In that respect, South Park and The Daily Show are exactly like network TV. South Park has maniacal workaholic creators who can write quality episodes on a dime. The Daily Show has an armada of researchers and detail personnel who can assemble the called for material on demand.

Music? SP has musical episodes with indelible songs with lyrics, created on the same deadline.

So educate me. If an hour show takes an 80 week to score, do 30 minute shows take a 40 hour week? Does a 2 hour movie take 2 80 hour weeks to score? Does a min-series take 3-4 weeks? I mean, if it's a strict time-on-task matter, can a twice as gifted composer compose twice as fast like a twice as fast fabricator at the Ford plant? Did the theme for Green Acres take more or less time than the theme for Dr. Zhivago? Did the theme for Seinfeld take more or less time than The Godfather?

I don't know why you are so hung up on this. It's a creative process. That's fine. It's not a knock.

Sometimes The Beatles bang out a few of the greatest pop songs ever in an hour or so. Sometimes, a less inspired or qualified prog rock group takes decades to put together an album. Sometimes, the cast and crew of Apocalypse Now nearly kills themselves over months in the jungle. Sometimes a Kevin Smith or Robert Rodriguez pump out a classic in weeks on adrenaline, credit cards, and the time appropriate version of a GoPro.

Good ****ing God.

I'll address all these fallacies in due time.

But for someone who watches everything, it's amazing how little respect you have for it all.

Baby Lee 01-01-2016 12:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 11989053)
Good ****ing God.

I'll address all these fallacies in due time.

But for someone who watches everything, it's amazing how little respect you have for it all.

Actually, the more you press this, the less respect you are showing.

I've told you numerous times, it's not a knock.

Creative content isn't a push button operation. If you write a good score or script in 40 hours. You don't write a great score or script by adding 10 or 20 hours more.

You seem to be conflating the logistics of the . . . less . . . creative details like sets, casting, location scouting, continuity, wardrobe, effects, etc., with the creative process. Those things can be hammered out with recruitment and investment.

Are you seriously suggesting that a Lorre or a Milch or an Abrams create twice as good a product in a given 2 weeks than they do in a given week?

Appreciate time and logistics, but that's not the same as creative.

Heck, watch retrospectives on any great show, and there are tons of anecdotes where the best moments were punched up on the spur of the moment, minutes to air. Or a genius plot that drives a season coming from a dream or a drunken encounter or a chance conversation.

There's a reason that 'stroke of genius' is a cliche and not 'lunch pail of genius.'

eDave 01-01-2016 12:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baby Lee (Post 11989074)
Actually, the more you press this, the less respect you are showing.

I've told you numerous times, it's not a knock.

Creative content isn't a push button operation. If you write a good score or script in 40 hours. You don't write a great score or script by adding 10 or 20 hours more.

You seem to be conflating the logistics of the . . . less . . . creative details like sets, casting, location scouting, continuity, wardrobe, effects, etc., with the creative process. Those things can be hammered out with recruitment and investment.

Are you seriously suggesting that a Lorre or a Milch or an Abrams create twice as good a product in a given 2 weeks than they do in a given week?

Appreciate time and logistics, but that's not the same as creative.

There's a reason that 'stroke of genius' is a cliche and not 'lunch pail of genius.'

As a creative myself, absolutely. NO doubt. As a creative, Dane will agree.

Why you think you know how creatives work?

RobBlake 01-01-2016 11:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baby Lee (Post 11989074)
Actually, the more you press this, the less respect you are showing.

I've told you numerous times, it's not a knock.

Creative content isn't a push button operation. If you write a good score or script in 40 hours. You don't write a great score or script by adding 10 or 20 hours more.

You seem to be conflating the logistics of the . . . less . . . creative details like sets, casting, location scouting, continuity, wardrobe, effects, etc., with the creative process. Those things can be hammered out with recruitment and investment.

Are you seriously suggesting that a Lorre or a Milch or an Abrams create twice as good a product in a given 2 weeks than they do in a given week?

Appreciate time and logistics, but that's not the same as creative.

Heck, watch retrospectives on any great show, and there are tons of anecdotes where the best moments were punched up on the spur of the moment, minutes to air. Or a genius plot that drives a season coming from a dream or a drunken encounter or a chance conversation.

There's a reason that 'stroke of genius' is a cliche and not 'lunch pail of genius.'

Just curious, how many things have you worked on based purely on being creative and mostly original that you want other people to enjoy ten years from you releasing it?

beach tribe 01-01-2016 02:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baby Lee (Post 11989074)
Actually, the more you press this, the less respect you are showing.

I've told you numerous times, it's not a knock.

Creative content isn't a push button operation. If you write a good score or script in 40 hours. You don't write a great score or script by adding 10 or 20 hours more.

You seem to be conflating the logistics of the . . . less . . . creative details like sets, casting, location scouting, continuity, wardrobe, effects, etc., with the creative process. Those things can be hammered out with recruitment and investment.

Are you seriously suggesting that a Lorre or a Milch or an Abrams create twice as good a product in a given 2 weeks than they do in a given week?

Appreciate time and logistics, but that's not the same as creative.

Heck, watch retrospectives on any great show, and there are tons of anecdotes where the best moments were punched up on the spur of the moment, minutes to air. Or a genius plot that drives a season coming from a dream or a drunken encounter or a chance conversation.

There's a reason that 'stroke of genius' is a cliche and not 'lunch pail of genius.'

Great things are created through hard work. If a show isn't well made to begin with nobody will give two shits about those anecdotes or it's "strokes of genius"

Where you got the inspiration for a plot, song hook, chord progression, is irrelevant. The real work is turning it into something that people will love.

The Beatles could write hit songs in 15 min because of 1000's and 1000's of hrs they put into mastering their craft. Not to mention elite, natural musical talent to go along with it.

Baby Lee 01-01-2016 02:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beach tribe (Post 11989620)
Great things are created through hard work. If a show isn't well made to begin with nobody will give two shits about those anecdotes or it's "strokes of genius"

Where you got the inspiration for a plot, song hook, chord progression, is irrelevant. The real work is turning it into something that people will love.

The Beatles could write hit songs in 15 min because of 1000's and 1000's of hrs they put into mastering their craft. Not to mention elite, natural musical talent to go along with it.

There's a difference between mastering your craft and producing product.

Analogous to the difference between Michael Jordan practicing and playing in the finals.

That's an artificial construct where the time is purposefully constrained to present the 'product,' but the comparison remains.

Creators lean on their entire life experience in their creative process. That doesn't mean a great idea fleshed out in a few days becomes a better idea with more sitting around ruminating or tinkering or fine tuning.

Sure, plenty of great idea require a great deal of legwork to bring to fruition. For instance GoT with elaborate sets and locations, or stop motion animation, or CGI extravaganzas. But a lot of that detail intensive time consuming work is separate from the creation.

DaneMcCloud 01-02-2016 12:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baby Lee (Post 11989074)
Actually, the more you press this, the less respect you are showing.

I've told you numerous times, it's not a knock.

Creative content isn't a push button operation. If you write a good score or script in 40 hours. You don't write a great score or script by adding 10 or 20 hours more.

You seem to be conflating the logistics of the . . . less . . . creative details like sets, casting, location scouting, continuity, wardrobe, effects, etc., with the creative process. Those things can be hammered out with recruitment and investment.

Are you seriously suggesting that a Lorre or a Milch or an Abrams create twice as good a product in a given 2 weeks than they do in a given week?

Appreciate time and logistics, but that's not the same as creative.

Heck, watch retrospectives on any great show, and there are tons of anecdotes where the best moments were punched up on the spur of the moment, minutes to air. Or a genius plot that drives a season coming from a dream or a drunken encounter or a chance conversation.

There's a reason that 'stroke of genius' is a cliche and not 'lunch pail of genius.'

You're a ****ing moron that has absolutely NO clue what it takes to create a TV program week in and week out, albeit a popular show that's ingrained in the culture.

Any reference to The Beatles further proves your dumbassery.

Maybe for your third career, you should pack up, move to Hollywood and create/produce/write a weekly TV series.

Because, you know, it's easy and all and doesn't require working 9-5.

:rolleyes:

Baby Lee 01-02-2016 08:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 11990551)
it's easy and all

and doesn't require working 9-5.

Two completely different concepts.

Never said it was easy, liar.

DJ's left nut 02-15-2016 03:15 PM

Better Call Saul starts up again tonight, FYI.

eDave 02-15-2016 06:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 12083110)
Better Call Saul starts up again tonight, FYI.

Binging now.

Baby Lee 02-15-2016 06:53 PM

It remains between this and The Leftovers as the best shows of the past year, for me.

There's been plenty of quality stuff, but those two stand out among titans.

Very excited. I know people love Breaking Bad, but I think Saul's descent is an even better milieu for Gilligan's storytelling style.

Buehler445 02-15-2016 07:54 PM

Thanks for the reminder. We got a new Dish unit and didn't get this one set on the DVR.

SAUTO 02-15-2016 10:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buehler445 (Post 12083751)
Thanks for the reminder. We got a new Dish unit and didn't get this one set on the DVR.

Hopper 3?

Demonpenz 02-15-2016 11:00 PM

The fat guy who had a heart attack in season 1 can play in "Clock blunders....the Andy Reid Story"

BWillie 02-16-2016 12:23 AM

Excellent episode. By the teasers for next week...looks like they are really going to make his metamorphosis into Saul abrupt, at least from an outsider looking in.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:55 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.