You sure about that?

If the Broncos got Rodgers they would be a SB contender and the biggest challenge to KC for the AFC.

Not sure how anyone could argue that. Not like Allen, Lamar or Baker are going to beat a Mahomes or Rodgers Team

It was 29 years before, but whose counting?

So that makes it all that more fun to beat them!

Well, there are some differences.

Stafford is much younger.

The Stafford trade came at the beginning of the QB carousel ride, when there were lots of bidders.

Stafford wasn't really disgruntled. They had a pretty amicable separation.

Stafford would have signed off on being traded to a long-ish list of teams.

Still, it would take a lot. I'm guessing a solid starter, a couple firsts, and a few other picks. It's worth it, if it opens up, say, a five-year window to go and try and win a championship.

Not afraid of either team, but if it's between the Raiders or the Donks, I'd rather he go to Denver.

Fangio is a ****ing fossil. He doesn't relate to his players. He almost got fired after one year after the locker room very nearly went after him with torches and pitchforks. He can put together a good enough defense, but other than that, he's only as good as his offensive coordinator.

For being nothing more than a psychotic meathead, Gruden has actually managed to defeat KC once. Denver has had pleeeenty of prime opportunities, most of it due to circumstantial bullshit like injuries or playing in Week 17 against a rookie QB. And they've lost. Each and every single ****ing time.

Rodgers could make the Raiders electric. In Denver I predict the only thing he'll do is highlight just exactly how mediocre those supposedly great weapons are at WR. They'll see a tick up in production, but it's not going to matter all that much.

Again, are you sure?

Shit, you're right.

1997
-1970
27 years

My bad :D

"If we had Aaron Rodgers, we'd be contenders for the conference title" can be said by more than half of the teams in the AFC.

Denver is nothing special in that regard.

Also, what's really funny is if Kansas City had Aaron Rodgers as its starting QB, they'd actually be a worse team LMAO

If I’m GB, I’d draw a line in the sand and Chubb, Jeudy and the next 3 first rounders and laugh all the way to the bank

...if they feel Love can play ball.

Denver has no chance whatsoever if they don’t get a top tier QB...so it’s probably worth a stupid trade like that for a player like Rogers.

Stoll wrong.

There was no Lombardi Trophy when you won. "Lombardi" was still alive, when you won. A long time ago, in other words.

Where did this notion that Rodgers is some unbeatable quarterback come from?

In the last decade he's been bounced out of the playoffs by

Alex Smith
Colin Kaepernick
Carson Palmer
Matt Ryan
Jimmy Garoppolo

It would not surprise me at all if Allen, Lamar or Baker knocked him out.

Okay. But you're moving the goalposts from the comments that started this back-and-forth. It was said that Aaron Rodgers couldn't help the Broncos crappy roster. That's just patently - well - ill informed.

Cheating is cheating. You guys are no better than New England

Just because we won another Lombardi doesn’t mean we’re gonna forget that you had to cheat to win 2 of yours

What a shit show.