Yyyyup. And calls me a bandwagon Chiefs fan LOL

The double Ds

If someone says commas aren't important, I direct you to the face asshole.

Face asshole.

Nice

ROFL

Id go with the "Oops I guess I was wrong about those guys" if I were you.
I'm not digging it up but he would likely own it and then attempt to downplay/rationalize it.

NO COMMA! Face asshole is perfect! :clap:

I'm not looking it up but I've read the same thing

I'm literally in tears over that for some reason

I did point to Alex's contract with enjoyment... but other than that, you twisted the rest horribly.

ROFL

Oh hootie cares, he cares a lot

Maybe he thinks her face looks like an asshole.

I'm surprised Hootie isnt hanging from a rope in his closet over his ban

I never got the outrage for Hootie, other than the gambling ring fallout, so I can see some having the same non issues with clay

FYP

So are so full of shit. During the 6 game shit fest you joyously celebrated how Alex made out like a bandit and this organization didnt deserve him.

Ill dig that shit up tomorrow.

You do that. I doubt you will find a legit post.. but even if somehow you might? you have to recognize that I may have been pushed to anger and lashing out...

but you go ahead and dig, face asshole.

No, he didn't. You often have the same opinion and you are still here. He was banned for being an asshole troll.

I'd rather have 2 clays here than this Sandy Cheeks person.

Just awful

This thread got a little vitriolic.

Clay doesn't even need to be here and all of a sudden it's 18+ pages of ad hominem attacks because the thread has his name associated with it.

says awful things about you, is all..

I get the need to defend a "pure Chiefs fan" over a "bandwagon fan"...

... but when you prefer a guy that hates on all things KC over a guy that wants the best for KC?

shit, dude.. you got problems..

Sandy is okay. Sure he goes ****ing complete nutso about every 12th post, but at least he'll talk football with some objectivity.

He didn't get banned for his opinion. He ruined the discussion of threads by bringing up his opinion in threads in which his opinion was irrelevant to the subject, thus leading to a dilution of the quality of discussion in threads.

You've said awful things about me? How dare you

Forst off, he's a she I think,

And second, well, ok

Ban this face asshole for his opinion! I've heard we're doing that kind of thing now

Drunk typing on iPad. It happens :D

Rip all of his teeth out, Doc!

I was asked to pull a tooth on a guy who refused anesthetic because he only puts natural stuff in his body once.

Pro tip, pulling a tooth without being numb hurts ALOT. It was not fun

If you can't ignore him, then JFC...

ROFL you don't say. Bad decision on his part :D He must not have gotten the memo about nerves inside of the mouth.

Yeah, it sucked. Plus I had 2 little kids in my waiting room that heard the whole 30 minutes of this dude letting out the most godawful noises.

That was interesting

The mods obviously weren't all raised right.


Some of you SONNABITCHES need to go wash the chef boyardee off of that ratty t shirt.

Yah that sucks for the kids because it was probably freaking them out. Sounds like you were re-enacting Hostel.

Not the exact one I was looking for but shows where you stand. You were happy he got a new fat contract and ok with demoting him to 3rd team.

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showp...2&postcount=12

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showp...2&postcount=16

http://i.imgur.com/pkWTY2k.png

Yeah, sandy has said shit like that on multiple occasions.

Horrid example. All I stated was that if Murray turns out to be a worthy option, then let it be. Was sick of all that Alex-benching-hate.

Always was open about Alex getting paid a contract that was indicative of his appreciation as a Chief. That never wavered.

Is it chunnelable?

When I was a kid I told the dentist to fill a tooth without anesthesia. Never again.

You were happy he got paid a shit ton based on future expectations and ok with him being 3rd string. Sounds like a real team fan LMAO

I get that from time to time. Some people can handle it. Did a root canal on a guy that didn't want any one time. Dude never flinched

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/bOtMizMQ6oM" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Yeah, that was pretty ****ing lame.

It's kinda true. I'm not looking for the link, but at some point during our five game losing streak, Sandy Cheeks posted something along the lines of "Hey, at least Smith is getting rich. He's a good guy and deserves it." Then something about Smith moving on to another team.

It's not as bad as BigCatDaddy wants it to seem. But it was a lame post during the losing streak, when Alex was playing poorly.

It's about time.

Tried and True: Anyone with "Daddy" in their user name is an insufferable twat.

Sad but true.

Oh, wait....you know what...I think BigCatDaddy may be spot on...I do now recall something in that post about the Chiefs not deserving him...or maybe it was something about moving on to an organization that does deserve him.

I hope BCD does dig it up tomorrow. I wanna see it again, now.

nervous sweat... my pristine reputation hanging in the balance... oh dear lord... help!

:whackit:

Bingo

This place has too many pussies on it.

I'm amazed that people think their opinion on who is banned or isn't means something. Pretty sure this site is owned by someone who decided to name mods and they with owner decides who stays and who goes. I do realize people donate to the site but I am sure that doesn't give them a say so in what happens here.

Clay has had more "Get out of jail free" cards on this site then anybody in the history of this place. But here we are listening to posters call people bleeding vags and ****'ers cause clay got moderated. I'll admit 10% of the time Clay posted some cool stuff but it was the other 90% that annoyed me. Hell I had him on ignore for years and then turned it off and just bypassed most of what he had to say. So what have I learned from being here almost 15 years:

A: I don't own the site.
B: I am not a mod.
C: It's a free message board when Austin could of made this a premium board.
D: I could give 2 sh*ts less who's banned.
E: If you like Clay you can go to where hes posting now and read whatever is running through his mind.


P.S. Comparing this place to the KC Star board is complete BS. Not even close.

I don't get it. I mean, i understand the perception of mod abuse, but it takes quite a bit for the mods to step in and do something. I am certain there is far more going on behind the curtain, as far as future expectations to be upheld post ban, that he didn't uphold, and that we generally have not one clue about.

What's not to get? It's pretty straightforward. They are banning people for things that aren't bannable, and they are using things like MU, and this one post thread ban, as de facto bans while claiming people haven't been banned.

:rolleyes:

I can't believe you're a lawyer. You make about as much sense as a turd I drop in the toilet.

Check that: Less, especially considering your stupid ass followed over SCOTT PIOLI IN 2009.

You can pretty much **** off and die at any time, DoucheLord.

I'm not sure what the eye roll is about. All I posted was a basic recap of what's been happening.

It's as if he was still here.

The man was asking to be 'banned'. I've seen him dare mods on several occasions upon his last return. Mods just granted what he wanted. Some of you are more upset than he is.

Now that's not very nice.

It is a privately owned web site. Everything is bannable if they want it to be. There is no constitutional or legal right to post on CP. Moses didn't hand the rules down on stone tablets from God.

How about the fact that he's not banned but moderated. Banned and moderated are 2 different things.

Are you SERIOUS? You joined CP in 2009 when Pioli was hired. He sucked ass.

Since that time, the Patriots have appeared in TWO Super Bowl while the Chiefs haven't WON a playoff game since 1994.

It seems like a waste of time to debate about banned members, especially on a site outside of the AFC East.

But I guess that's just me.

It's a de facto ban.

Ban, not a ban - doesn't matter. They can ban anyone they want for anything they want.

Quit being an asshole. I wasn't debating anything. Someone said they didn't get Milkman's point. I just broke Milkman's point down into basic terms for that poster, since Milkman hadn't yet responded.

And what the Patriots have done, when I joined, etc..., that stuff has nothing to do with any of this.

Oh yay, the contriarians have arrived to tell us all about the horrors of unthical banning!

I guess there was always going to be a vacuum of dipshit trollery.

Are many people really debating that as a private site it's the mods right to make a decision? It's more about what people view is the image of this site. CP has a lot of mythos, and maybe the biggest of all is the leathery skin it takes to post here. I think people have the right to express their concern over that, especially those unlike me who have put in their time.

Maybe this site doesn't move humanity forward, but it has it's own awkward charm, even for those of us that don't participate in that attitude. I don't know what specific posts if any led to Clay being banned or neutered until he gave up. I know that when I thought he was trolling I ignored him, which was a lot. The problem is some people took the bait for some unknown reason. How you can quote a guy and accuse him of trolling and not realize that you are the one giving him power is beyond me.

Anyway, I tend to agree with Milkman here. Unless I am missing facts I would prefer that it be an actual egregious post that got him in the cross hairs, not just constant annoyance.

Face asshole

Clay is like the terrorists. We continue to talk about him, and thus he has won.

Hmmm. Hadn't noticed honestly.

Great post! CP's knocked out 3 of the top 20 posters by banning, so called, malcontents to appease the homers.
While guys like Clay and RoR criticize and challenge every move that's made by the Chiefs, the homers have very little to offer in rebuttal, (you know who you are).
To think that CP is leaning towards a Orange Mange type of moderation is scary:
- Rain Man could be banned for saying he liked Leslie O'Neal
- Dane could be banned for not liking the new Star Wars movie
- SNR could be banned for his love of rape and Terrance Copper

Where does it end?!? Milkman's right for a change. I implore the CP mods to stop catering to pussies and let people talk.

People with chaffed pussies should visit their local OBGYN.

This might be the dumbest posts ever.

:D (that wasn't even a proper sentence)

Yeah, I suck on the iPads

:D

Do you agree with this level of moderation for CP?

I'm friends with most of the mods, if not all of them, outside of CP. I think they're all good dudes that try to do the best for this forum.

Regardless of this so-called "banning", CP will survive.

It's survived the losses of several high post count members over the years, other "popular" members comings and goings and even the death of one its most important members.

CP will once again, survive.

He can log in as himself, he can read every post in every thread, and if I understand correctly, he can make one post in every thread.

Doesn't sound like a ban to me. Sounds more like poetic justice.

I've always said it would be best to give him his own subforum for him to shit up.

Others can post in it and he can't post anywhere else.

Name it the Goatse Hot Take (Sponsored by Fan Duel!)