Uncapping anything isn't very bright, however using a cap for each position could work out.
|
What about a designated uncapped player? You can designate one player's non-rookie contract as uncapped, and you can only designate players you are re-signing and not for free agents.
QBs would be the biggest beneficiaries of this type of deal but it frees up money for other players. |
There’s no really good answer for it. But if next year is really uncapped, extending Mahomes now and dumping a shioad of guaranteed money into base salary next year is a good way to go.
They prevented this in 2010 with the 30% rule. I’d imagine they have that in place again. However, you could still maneuver to take advantage somewhat. |
So Tyreek is good, Chris Jones is at camp...what else is there to worry about in camp now? If Dieter makes the team? Which backup TE makes the team?
Lol we've never been this set. Bring on the season. |
Quote:
|
I'm more concerned with Ragland than Ward
|
Quote:
Not the best solution, but would at least be a way to address it. The downside is more Daniel Jones and Mitchell Trubisky's would be way overdrafted. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Next year, he can be franchised. The next year we may be in a new CBA. People forget Aaron Donald also wanted a new contract before the end of his rookie deal. Didn't get it, and had to accrue. Got franchised the next year. Then signed his mega deal for the year after that. It will certainly be interesting with Jones, Hill and Mahomes. About the only thing that is close to certain is that Mahomes will get his contract barring something really unforeseen. |
JuJu Smith-Schuster beats Steven Nelson down the sideline for a long catch down the sideline from Roethlisberger #Steelers #dkps
Definitely wont miss that clown |
Quote:
He's a potential trade candidate. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
FAX |
Quote:
We don't even think it. FAX |
Quote:
It would also prevent teams like Dallas from getting stuck with a very expensive, average QB...Dak is going to get paid much more than he's worth because of the market. It would keep a competitive balance...as the NFL shouldn't want top paid QBs with no money left to build around. It would also offer a lot more money for QBs... |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:08 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.