What does this mean for Tyreek?
|
Some major overreaction on both sides. Adding Clark isn't going to make KC a top 10 defense nor is going to hamper them from being one with some more good moves. I would have liked if KC waited to see who was available tomorrow night, but obviously, that didn't matter to Veach.
|
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">You can argue the value of the compensation, but in Spags’ scheme he absolutely is. Can you see Dee lining up in a 6 tech? No shade at all. These are schematically relevant differences and people lump all edge guys together. <a href="https://t.co/5AJPO7QTqO">https://t.co/5AJPO7QTqO</a></p>— Chris Long (@JOEL9ONE) <a href="https://twitter.com/JOEL9ONE/status/1120754783089057792?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 23, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script> |
Quote:
|
I think the Chiefs org knew this was likely to happen, that is why the Draft Party is not on the first night...:)
|
Quote:
And in 3 seasons, we can get out of the Clark deal judging by early reports. Also, what's the point of cap space if you don't use it? Cap space doesn't win championships. Talent does. Since i joined in '05 ive never understood CP's over infatuation with cap space. Sometimes it feels like all ya'll care about is Clark saving money. Thank god Clark is more interested in winning a Championship than some of our fans... |
This move makes KC a hell of a lot better up front. Clark is a clear upgrade over Ford, and fits in your new D much better than Ford would have.
Paid a ton, but this move just about has to make KC a superbowl favorite. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
We're ALL IN. But not just for 2019. Clark is 25 years old. We're all in for the next several years. Clark is Dee Ford but WAY BETTER. Other than the off the field issues there's absolutely nothing not to like here. There is no #29 that you could bank on producing immediately at all, let alone being the force that Clark is. Clark is a ****ing stud DE. Anybody who thinks Clowney is better hasn't been watching either of them since they were drafted. |
Sweet, I'm not missing anything Thursday. I get to see Endgame and I got to see a stupid board meltdown over what we did the first round.
|
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">If the Frank Clark contract is structured similar to the DeMarcus Lawrence deal, expect the $63.5 million guaranteed to come during the first three years. Lawrence's deal is structured with an opt-out after three years that spreads $10 million in dead money to the fourth year.</p>— Matt Derrick (@mattderrick) <a href="https://twitter.com/mattderrick/status/1120756457882910720?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 23, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
|
Seems to me giving up valuable draft picks for the right to pay someone market value doesn't make a whole lot of sense, especially in the long run if one is hoping on building a dynasty. Has New England EVER done this?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Terez Paylor's take on it. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:07 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.