Why do you have posts per page set so low? I have mine set to max.

Yeah. Pen, you are simply taking this way too seriously.

That's all.

That should do it. ROFL

Your original thread was stupid. The mods got tired of stupid threads. There's been too many today.

JESUS ****ING CHRIST WHO THE **** CARES? LIGHTEN UP!

Because ... I don't want to be like you in any way, shape or form? :p

:D

Refer to the DC planet. You will see that I ask many, many questions that are never answered. All of which are puncuated with a quesiton mark.

What can I say? chiefs4me brings out my warm and fuzzy side.

You are lying.

You revealed that you have your posts per page set to a low number earlier in this thread. Before I revealed that I have mine set to max.

Furthermore, there is no way you could have known prior to my revelation of my posts per page setting.

You are lying.

So what do you call women when you hate them?

Actually it is very appropriate, it is Friday and I just ate some fish.

This is not the first thread where you have mentioned that you have your posts per page set to max. No cookie for you, Sherlock. :D

"Slimy c*nt" usually works. I've noticed that virtually all females have a visceral reaction to that one.

I had tuna for lunch.

Amen. :D

Where is the proof? You are lying again.

Not true GoChiefs, you had a lesson on here one night about it. You even posted a picture of your settings, that is how I knew to set mine. :p

What if we took up a collection and got you a BRAND NEW rubber penis?... :thumb:

I am innocent until proven guilty. The burden of proof falls to you. :p

The defense calls HemiEd to the stand. :D

Okay then. Ban all stupid threads. If that happened I'd have to say that you, along with me, would find themselves banned.

The bottom line is that this particular mod made a mistake. Nobody's words should be altered. A thread should be deleted before it should be changed to reflect something different than the thread starter intended.

Again, again, again, and again......this particular instance is of minimal signifigance, but it is the principle that is VERY important, IMO.

I don't think anybody else on this board would want the wording of their ideas changed for any reason, regardless of the topic.

Now if we could only find those bar stools, or someone closely resembling them.

pen, please, go have a beer (or 6) and settle down. Seriously.

ROFL ROFL ROFL

Your words were switched? You made a freaking parody thread for christ sakes. It wasn't like you were saying anything insightful.

A parody thread you made was turned into another parody thread.

Build a bridge, get over it.

:cuss:

4th, I'm not upset. I just find it amazing that there isn't one person who understands whe principle that I'm trying to defend.

I realize that the intitial act was not intended to be harmful, but to listen to everyone beligerently defend the act as opposed to defending the principle is confounding to me.

I feel compelled to convince, but by no means, don't take that to mean that I am still pissed.

It's not that you made a stupid thread. You made a stupid thread that is a near-copy of the other similar stupid threads on the board today. WE HAVE TOO MANY.

Your lessons taught have come back to haunt you oh wise one? Seriously, I appreciated the help, thanks.

The title of this thread "WHO STOLE MY RUBBER PENIS AND WHY?" made
me laugh. Thats classic, this thread might be destined for the the Hall of Fame archives.

You are correct, the board did get a little out of control today. It was a mess and they tried to clean it up. We needed the room for the piss, poop and fluid swapping threads. :)

Then why weren't all the stupid threads pertaining to this topic merged instead of just mine and shitsmacks, or whoever started the TY LAW HATES....thread?

Because then it would have been boring. Obviously whatever mod did this was genius enough to know that it'd throw a lizard down your dress and send you into an arm-flailing tissy.

Which it did.

Making the the thread a possible classic instead of condensed spam...

There's really only one thing left for me to do on this thread.

http://img302.imageshack.us/img302/9850/clue0pf.jpg

:D

you may have missed this

I'm over it. The point now is to debate the intent of the person who changed the wording of a thread title that he didn't start. If it were an innocent merging of threads, not only would ALL of the parody threads (instead of just the two) been merged but whoever did it would not have applied a thread title to a thread that was incongruent with that title.

Who started the thread titled, "TY LAW HATES PARODY THREADS?"

I'd be interested to know. Since it looks like I did, I guess we'll never know unless that person admits it or someone else remembers.

:banghead:

haha, this is the best thread title change ever.

The title's were ABSOLUTELY related. All of it was unnecessary spam.

Then condense them all.....even condense them all under shitsmack's thread title....... but don't condense them all under shitsmack's thread title and attribute them to me as the thread starter.

Understand?

Look, I joked with you. Then I politely explained it.

Now, I'm done with that.

I MERGED SIX ****ING THREADS MORON. They were the ones that happened to be on the front page.

Are you a mod? Do you know how long that takes, or what that does to performance on the server while the database catches up?

SHUT THE **** UP.

Seriously.

Because there is NO principle here, Don Quixote.

Then why condense the content of my thread with shitsmacks thread title and leave all of the other "ABSOLUTELY" related threads alone?

And don't give me that first page bullshit, as shitsmack did. As all of us know, any one of those threads will reappear on the first page the instance someone posts on those threads.

Listen closely.

NOBODY STARTED A THREAD TITLED "TY LAW HATES PARODY THREADS!"

I merged 6 threads together and RENAMED ALL OF THEM.

Is it that hard to understand?

First of all, "shitsmack" and myself are the SAME PERSON. Are you really that dense?

Second, the second those threads hit the front page, they will be merged.

Okay, who's thread title did you use?

Yours?

Who started the thread, "TY LAW HATES PARODY THREADS?."

Jesus Christ.

NOBODY started the thread. That title was APPLIED to a thread containing 6 merged threads. *I* gave it that title.

Bob Dole would like to point out that this thread is just fine without pics.

You're still whining about that? Get a life, man.

Awesome name...

ROFL

Bullshit! I saw the thread before I went back to work. My thread, and everybody else's parody thread, was still existent. And yes, you are correct, there were five or six of them. But don't try to tell me that nobody started a "TY LAW HATES PARODY THREADS" thread because I saw it. And I'm quite certain others did, too.

And don't try to explain that you or anyone else combined all of the parody threads because the other parody threads are still out there while the threads you claim to combine has only 16 posts, 10 of which occurred on my thread before I went back to work.

This is no longer about my being a prick. This is about the integrity of this forum, IMO. Don't get me wrong. I have always liked you but I think you are being stubborn, unfair, and dishonest in this instance.

No kidding? Are you so dense that you can't figure out that I rearranged the letters in your handle and added an ess to come up with "shitsmack?"

Second, just like you did with mine, merge those other threads under the thread title that pleases YOU, okay?

Look, I'm done trying to explain this to you. I KNOW what I did, and it's in the logs for the other mods to see.

The "TY LAW HATES PARODY THREADS" thread you saw was in the process of being merged. The first thread I merged was not yours, which is why both existed simultaneously.

Of course, you don't know this, because you're not a mod and you DON'T HAVE A ****ING CLUE how this software works. Because if you did, you'd know that you can only merge TWO THREADS AT A TIME. That means to merge 6 threads, I had to go through the process 5 separate times, resulting in the parody threads AS WELL AS the merged thread existing simultaneously.

4 of the 6 threads I merged had only 1 post - the starter - including yours. The other two had only a handful of posts. As for the other posts being out there, I'm going to merge them right now since you're such a ****ing pussy about it.

This isn't about the integrity of the forum, this is about you being righteously indignant for no ****ing reason at all.

Thanks for nothing, mother****er. :cuss:

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showt...9566&p=2569365

Guess you missed this didn't you?

I don't believe mods would alter the words of a thread with substance. There hasn't been a lot of substance on the planet lately. We really need the season to start before the Planet completely implodes. Although it is very entertaining.

So referring to me and "shitsmack" in the same sentence, as if we are 2 different people is part of your schtick? You're a fuggin genious.

The threads are merged, and I used a title that please me just fine.

OMFG! The thread title changed again! The neighbors are gonna think I'm a reerun. Laughing my ass off, and nobody else is here! Sh*t!

seriously, you've brought the integrity dog and pony show to the main forum...?

Do you get disappointed a lot?

He's gonna be real disappointed when I move his soapbox to the Hall of Classics and/or the Romper Room.

Hopefully we won't have to endure an endless attack on the "administration" of this board.

Good lord, penchief, are you really this big a pussy? :rolleyes:

Okay, since you condensed "ALL" of those threads under one thread title, why did you use YOUR thread title instead of mine when the only posts on that thread were in response to my thread title?

Why didn't you condense all of those threads and attribute them to you?

That is my point. Understand?

It is dishonest to do what you did, IMO. Let alone the fact that you didn't condense more than just two threads (if that) even though you claim to have done so.

If it was a mistake, I can accept that but don't try to make me look like I'm being unreasonable. I feel like it was your intent to enhance your own prestige by using your mod powers to fuch with someone whose opinion you resent or disagree with.

Hey, pen, I stole your poopy pants. I can't hide my secret any longer.

If you want them back, send $10,000 in unmarked bills to the corner of 5th and Main in a black duffel bag with white straps. Put it in the green trash can.

Call a waaaambulance.

Oh, and why? The poop gives life. The poop must flow!

Wow. Dude - when threads are merged mods are given the option to change the title. The thread starter then appears to be the individual who started the oldest thread being merged. That just happened to be you in this case.

Good lord, Brock. If I were as big a pussy as you suggest, I would have already folded my tent and gone home instead of arguing the point.

The point is that no matter how offensive you or anyone else can be, there are standards of conduct. Only when those of us who believe in those standards strongly enough are willing to go "toe to toe" with the posers that try to intimidate through insult, will we ever be able to break the ice.

Can I physically kick your ass? Without a doubt.

Does it matter? No.

What matters it that people understand that kicking others to the curb is not the way. Getting people to join you in treating humanity with respect and the understanding of personal responsibility is the key to making the world a better place.

So, KISS MY FUCHIN' ASS! ROFL

I did not use MY thread title, because I didn't start a thread. I named a merged thread. Of course, you don't understand.

I find it funny, ironic, and pathetic that you started an entirely new thread to find out WHO changed your thread title because you didn't know, but at the same time you accuse me of attributing those other threads to myself. If I were taking credit for them, don't you think you'd KNOW who changed your thread?

You don't KNOW what the facts are, the rest of the mods do. It's in the logs. I can rest easy knowing that the other mods are honest and fair, while you continue to act like an ass.

Enhance my prestige? Give me a ****ing break. I merged SPAM threads after several people complained.

But by all means, if you want to continue talking out of your ass, go ahead. I'm quite certain at least 100 people have seen this thread and now think much less of you than they did before. One post in this thread has garnered me more rep than any other single post I've ever made.

Respect is EARNED.

Exactly right. I hadn't noticed this numbnuts before this tirade. He sounds like he is off his meds.

Feel free to try and prove it, you mouthy broad. I doubt that anyone who gets upset over an internet message board is going to present much of a hazard to anyone.

If you hadn't been spamming the board like a mindless fuckwit, your delicate sensibilities wouldn't have gotten offended.

Come on Phil. This was obviously a case of me trying to enhance my prestige by stealing the ideas of another poster...

ROFL

Somebody merged penchief's "woe is me" thread with Laz' parody of said thread, so now it looks like Laz started the thread.

ROFL

I figured everybody could use a laugh and penchief could use the practical application.

ROFL Very nice.

I'm thinking some people here are in desperate need of a football season... It's turned into one soap opera after another in the down-time...

Oh shit. I didn't really think this through. Now Laz is going to cry and shit. Damn. Shit. How can I fix this?

you can just blame it on me...ROFL

If you review my responses closely, you will see that I never implicitely accused you of anything. However, I did imply that your motives were less than honest. If I am wrong, then I have to answer to that and I will accept the consequences. To point out that your responses to me have garnered you "more rep than any other single post" does nothing to enhance your argument. It only tells me that you are constantly checking your rep and that you don't have the conviction of your beliefs unless your homies are backing you up.