ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Saccopoo Memorial Draft Forum (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=29)
-   -   I am not a fan of Veach's "tier" approach. (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=338150)

The Franchise 05-02-2021 09:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Direckshun (Post 15658633)
I actually think Danna will be a good rotational DE. Same with Taco. And, by Year 2, I feel the same about Kaindoh.

But we need a starter. We do not have a DE2, and we passed on several plum candidates to take Bolton and Humphrey.

At least Humphrey is going to make a Pro Bowl. Bolton’s going to be fine.

Who? Basham?

Direckshun 05-02-2021 09:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 15658631)
So you want them to move this guys down because positional value and miss out on them for lower tiered players of higher positional value?

And this is why I hate tiers.

The idea that a guy is in a lower tier clearly denotes him as a step down— but some of these guys aren’t huge steps down.

And if you gave me the choice of an A linebacker and a C passrusher, or an A passrusher and a C linebacker, I know which one is take.

The Franchise 05-02-2021 09:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Direckshun (Post 15658637)
And this is why I hate tiers.

The idea that a guy is in a lower tier clearly denotes him as a step down— but some of these guys aren’t huge steps down.

And if you gave me the choice of an A linebacker and a C passrusher, or an A passrusher and a C linebacker, I know which one is take.

Except they might not have seen Basham as an A pass rusher. We don’t know how they had him valued.

O.city 05-02-2021 09:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Direckshun (Post 15658633)
I actually think Danna will be a good rotational DE. Same with Taco. And, by Year 2, I feel the same about Kaindoh.

But we need a starter. We do not have a DE2, and we passed on several plum candidates to take Bolton and Humphrey.

At least Humphrey is going to make a Pro Bowl. Bolton’s going to be fine.

If you want a legit DE, you’re either gonna have to go the frank clark route and trade for one or take one likely in the first round.

The Franchise 05-02-2021 09:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 15658640)
If you want a legit DE, you’re either gonna have to go the frank clark route and trade for one or take one likely in the first round.

And a ton of those guys went late first. No way were we trading up that high to get one of the bottom. That’s how you get Speaks 2.0.

staylor26 05-02-2021 09:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 15658635)
That was pretty early in the draft process. He’s a good player, I’m just not a fan of back to back lber in the 2nd with what was on the board but they had him rated high, and when that falls that way you take them.

So you were fine with LB in the 1st after going LB in the 2nd last year back then, but LB in the 2nd two years in a row is bad?

The Franchise 05-02-2021 09:36 AM

Everyone okay with the Cardinals taking two LBs with back to back top 20 picks?

staylor26 05-02-2021 09:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 15658652)
Everyone okay with the Cardinals taking two LBs with back to back top 20 picks?

Now that’s a positional argument that I totally understand. Those were top 20 ****ing picks. Not 32, 58, and 63. Completely different ball game.

The Franchise 05-02-2021 09:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 15658654)
Now that’s a positional argument that I totally understand. Those were top 20 ****ing picks. Not 32, 58, and 63. Completely different ball game.

I’m just saying. If I was a Cardinals fan...I would be pissed at the Zaven Collins pick right now.

staylor26 05-02-2021 09:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 15658656)
I’m just saying. If I was a Cardinals fan...I would be pissed at the Zaven Collins pick right now.

Absolutely. I was agreeing with you.

But the issue is people like Direckshun are so concerned with positional value that they overlook real value.

Bolton and Humphrey were consensus top 40-50 guys at the very least that some had going in the 1st round.

To get that at 58 and 63 IS value.

Do the Chiefs not have a need at those positions? If they work out, are the Chiefs not getting value having a starting C and MLB on rookie deals as opposed to paying market value at those positions to fill a need in free agency? Value is value.

O.city 05-02-2021 09:43 AM

I worry with Bolton that he’s a stiff lber who ends up being a 2 down player but all my Mu buddies love the guy and say he’ll work hard to become more than that.

Eric kendricks type player is the upside so if that hits were in great shape

O.city 05-02-2021 09:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 15658648)
So you were fine with LB in the 1st after going LB in the 2nd last year back then, but LB in the 2nd two years in a row is bad?

I thought he was a legit top 20ish dude and if he fell yeah it wouldn’t be ideal but the value is too tough to pass. I don’t think they’d have taken him at 31 but you can’t pass the way it worked out

The Franchise 05-02-2021 09:45 AM

A LB at 58 when one of your weakest positions on defense is LB....is not a bad pick.

But you’ve got teams like the Cardinals who just took another LB or the Jags who took a 3rd down RB in the first round and all the talking heads are in love with those picks.

O.city 05-02-2021 09:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 15658652)
Everyone okay with the Cardinals taking two LBs with back to back top 20 picks?

I think they view him more of a pass rushing lber/de.

I don’t like it but with those two the upside is so high in what they can be I guess it makes sense

The Franchise 05-02-2021 09:46 AM

Bolton is worth the fact that when Hitchens gets tired or hurt....we won’t have to see Niemann come into the field at MLB.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:18 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.