ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football It’s official: Pats were always Tom Brady. Not Bill Belichick. (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=334580)

Chief Pagan 11-04-2020 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MahomesMagic (Post 15294806)
Belichick is correct. That's what you do to win Super Bowls. I see plenty of teams that never do jack and only talk about the future. The Patriots went all in and it worked.

We will have to do the same thing. There will be periods where we have to offload good players and get cheaper and hope for the best. That's the salary cap and NFL parity.

If KC wins 3+ titles with Mahomes and then starts 2-5 the first year without him and has some painful cap rebuilding years, I ain’t going to cry about it.

Megatron96 11-04-2020 12:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MahomesMagic (Post 15294806)
Belichick is correct. That's what you do to win Super Bowls. I see plenty of teams that never do jack and only talk about the future. The Patriots went all in and it worked.
.

This is basically what I got from his "we sold out" comment.

Apparently they had a plan; do whatever they had to do in the short term to win as many SBs as possible over a period of about 5 years. They won 3, lost one. If they'd kept Jimmy G. and offloaded Brady they might've been able to extend that plan a bit, but they didn't or couldn't, and so Bill decided to push all his chips into the middle and try to win as much as possible under the shorter timetable.

Now they're paying for it.

crispystl 11-04-2020 12:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OrtonsPiercedTaint (Post 15298888)
The rest of the AFC East really hate NE. The Bills give the Chiefs Mahomes. The Dolphins give the Chiefs the bye. The Jets, the poor bastards. Don't have much, but they trying

The Jets gave us Bell duh!

Chief Roundup 11-08-2020 10:13 PM

Yeah the Patriots never got their asses handed to them like this game under BB.

htismaqe 11-08-2020 10:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup (Post 15315121)
Yeah the Patriots never got their asses handed to them like this game under BB.

Their whole season this year is similar to this game.

ping2000 11-08-2020 10:21 PM

Can't we just hate them both?

Sent from my SM-G970U using Tapatalk

Chief Roundup 11-08-2020 10:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 15315130)
Their whole season this year is similar to this game.

When was the last time they lost by 35 to a division rival with 1st place in the division on the line? It would have been more had the Saints not pulled back in the second half.

Chief Roundup 11-08-2020 10:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ping2000 (Post 15315144)
Can't we just hate them both?

I thought that was a given!!!

htismaqe 11-08-2020 10:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup (Post 15315148)
When was the last time they lost by 35 to a division rival with 1st place in the division on the line? It would have been more had the Saints not pulled back in the second half.

When was the last time a Tom Brady-led team was 2-5?

I mean are we really arguing who sucks more? :D

Buehler445 11-08-2020 10:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ping2000 (Post 15315144)
Can't we just hate them both?

Sent from my SM-G970U using Tapatalk

Yes.

At least that's what I'm doing.

I might be breaking the rules, but I'm ****ing doing that shit right here and right now.

**** all things Cheatriot.

Skyy God 11-09-2020 06:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ping2000 (Post 15315144)
Can't we just hate them both?

Sent from my SM-G970U using Tapatalk

This is the correct answer.

Skyy God 11-09-2020 06:53 AM

Also, the Pats suck because Cam is washed, a bunch of their players opted out or left in free agency, their actual cash spending has been pretty low the last few years, and BB has drafted terribly in recent years.

RedRaider56 11-09-2020 07:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cave Johnson (Post 15315438)
Also, the Pats suck because Cam is washed, a bunch of their players opted out or left in free agency, their actual cash spending has been pretty low the last few years, and BB has drafted terribly in recent years.

I just don't know why the Pats just don't go with Stidham at this point. What do they have to lose? Cam is done

Why Not? 11-09-2020 08:51 AM

It's probably both. I think history has proven you basically need one of two elements to win a Super Bowl:

1. Great coach and great QB

2. Good coach/elite defense

I'm trying to think of the last team to win a SB with a garbage QB and a mediocre defense but an elite head coach. Or a team with an amazing QB, but an awful HC. There is probably an example somewhere.

GloucesterChief 11-09-2020 08:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Why Not? (Post 15315558)
It's probably both. I think history has proven you basically need one of two elements to win a Super Bowl:

1. Great coach and great QB

2. Good coach/elite defense

I'm trying to think of the last team to win a SB with a garbage QB and a mediocre defense but an elite head coach. Or a team with an amazing QB, but an awful HC. There is probably an example somewhere.

Switzer and the Cowboys?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:28 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.