![]() |
Not having to drive would be a dream. Literally life changing.
I have come to dislike it in the past 5 or so years. So many chances for bad and annoying things to happen that can cause people to get hurt or a ton of money come out of my pocket. I would not need to drive a whole lot of my work commute was not 30-45 mins one day I can get away with most stuff being walkable or public transit adjacent during stretches off of days. |
Driverless car honked at my son while he was crossing the street in SF in a crosswalk.
3 driverless cars were stalled and blocking 2 of 4 lanes in the middle of SF a few weeks ago causing tons of havoc |
Quote:
Yes, the network being hacked is one of those unlikely, but high risk scenarios that need to be taken seriously. Having millions of cars being ordered to crash simultaneously is the Hollywood movie scenario. But even just a situation where a hack shuts down tens of millions of cars that commuters count on every day would be serious. The idea that any network that is online is 100 percent secure is laughable. |
Quote:
Quote:
Then there is the other extreme like China, if I remember correctly, where you basically live at the factory, almost like a prison. I guess it is the choice you make on where you want to live. |
Quote:
Have you? |
Quote:
|
I prefer to drive myself. I enjoy making good time and beating the clock on long trips and I think there are times I can do things in my car that a computer wouldn't let me do. A self-driving feature that gives me a choice would make sense for me maybe but in the end I probably wouldn't use it much. Maybe when I'm 75 years old. Driving equals freedom and somehow I think a self driving car would take away from that.
I think it's weird that some people(men) don't like to drive. Driving is such a man thing to do. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Spend enough time on California highways where 70 mph traffic is 4 or more lanes wide, only a couple of car lengths apart, and then moments later, you're stuck in grid lock. Yes, I'd rather just be on my phone/tablet than behind the wheel. |
Quote:
Now **** off you big fat poosy! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Instead of driverless cars what we need to invest in is hover cars. That would solve basically every problem. No more wear and tear on infrastructure and accidents would no longer be a big problem. A couple of hover cars hitting each other would just cause a reaction where each bounces or spins in some direction with no real damage besides maybe some dents.
|
Quote:
|
I have a Y Tesla and Full Self Driving (FSD) beta. Like lots of cars today, I can get on the interstate and the car will drive itself as long as I stay on the interstate. This is not FSD beta. All Teslas are capable of doing this. It does make long drives a lot more comfortable. It will slow down and pass with whatever speed you want to set and if a Navigation point is set it will drive from entry on Interstates to off ramp from Interstates.
FSD beta tries to put this freedom on regular driving in town and country roads. I do use it on routes I know because I am aware of where it will have troubles. But in city driving it is nice because it stops at stop signs and proceeds with right of way, at stop lights and goes on green and slows or stops for cars in front of me turning or stopping at intersections. Stop and go driving is less stressful. It does not do as well on country roads or highways with slightly skewed intersection meeting. It will not recognize entry roads to destinations as not part of highways. It has problems with stopped emergency vehicles and associated human directions at such scenes. But I have seen lots of improvement over the year. I am concerned that my particular car may not have the resolution and cpu power to actually get to a practical level of self driving. It is not GPS dependent at all and the visual and processing power has to be on board for Tesla's implementation. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:29 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.