Jerry Jones wonders why Julian Edelman’s muffed punt was overturned

[Dr. Yu Weed Tard]

Originally Posted by Renegade

I also hate the rule on a kickoff if the receiving team is standing out of bounds, and the ball touches the out of bounds player(or even if the player touches the ball), the ball is out of bounds, therefore ball is placed on the 40.

I believe this happened to us this year.

Correct, and it did.

[Sorry]

Every single angle showed it didn’t touch him jfc wrong hill to die on.

Hogan was a catch. Literally more of a catch than the controversial fez Bryant catch.

Refs for the most part was what anyone would want in a playoff game. Refs let chiefs mug patriots .. let’s move on

[dj56dt58]

Originally Posted by Sorry

Every single angle showed it didn’t touch him jfc wrong hill to die on.

Hogan was a catch. Literally more of a catch than the controversial fez Bryant catch.

Refs for the most part was what anyone would want in a playoff game. Refs let chiefs mug patriots .. let’s move on

I dont think so. One angle it looks like hit touched his thumb, even the announcers thought it did. On the other angles it looks like it didnt. Which angle to you go by? Also did it hit his arm? Sure looks like it might have. A lot of uncertainty which means call should stand

[Sorry]

Originally Posted by dj56dt58

I dont think so. One angle it looks like hit touched his thumb, even the announcers thought it did. On the other angles it looks like it didnt. Which angle to you go by? Also did it hit his arm? Sure looks like it might have. A lot of uncertainty which means call should stand

Bro, yes one angle makes it appear it does but the very next angle shows it does not. Each angel shows that it either doesn’t touch the thumb or his bicep and it’s lretty clear when you take it all into consideration. It’s simply a logic equation at that point if you will. Each angle eliminated one scenario f him touching the ball. The odds of that happening again must be astronomical because any other time the ball would have graced him.

[Red Dawg]

Originally Posted by Haglund's_Spirit

Correct, and it did.

Dan Fouts is so dumb he thought the Raiders goofed and caught a break by luck
Clearly it was done on purpose.

[Rain Man]

Originally Posted by Renegade

I also hate the rule on a kickoff if the receiving team is standing out of bounds, and the ball touches the out of bounds player(or even if the player touches the ball), the ball is out of bounds, therefore ball is placed on the 40.

I believe this happened to us this year.

Yeah, I don't like that one, either. It seems like it should only count if the ball is untouched and goes out. If the ball is touched, it's placed where the ball went out of bounds. What's the downside of that? How could someone cheat it?