****The Tyreek Hill Thread***

[Dante84]

With the 165th pick, in the 5th round.

Nutt said that Toub felt Hill was like Devin Hester.

— Nick Jacobs (@Jacobs71) April 30, 2016

[Pasta Little Brioni]

Originally Posted by Steve Sewell

I had no idea until I read the story that he repeatedly punched his PREGNANT girlfriend in the stomach as part of the assault.

Stay classy Chiefs...

Huh? So you must not cheer for Talib or Von then, right????

[Steve Sewell]

Originally Posted by Pasta Giant Meatball

Huh? So you must not cheer for Talib or Von then, right????

They've beaten, strangled, and punched defenseless pregnant women in the stomach repeatedly? That's news to me.

[KChiefs1]

https://www.facebook.com/waldotshirt...4238929298544/








Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[DaneMcCloud]

Originally Posted by Detoxing

Has the victim moved on? I've read here that he's back with his baby mama, but i don't recall ever reading a publication that states that.

No. Kent Babb, of all people, wrote an article that appeared in the Washington Post today.

Not only are they not together, Hill has never met his son and despite his promise to help financially, he hasn't provided a single penny.

She filed for Child Support of about $1,400 per month, along with $106 dollars in lieu of health insurance, in an Oklahoma court last month. The judgement is pending.

The Chiefs denied a request to speak to Hill for the article.

----

https://www.washingtonpost.com/sport...=.5ac41dadc4a4

He also indicated that, though the court had not ordered it, he was providing financial assistance to his ex-girlfriend and their now-18-month-old son.

But Oklahoma court documents show that this past September Hill’s ex-girlfriend sued Hill for financial support. In December a new filing outlined the ex-girlfriend’s demands for $1,382 per month in child support and medical costs.

Hill has not formally responded, records show, and the case is still pending. Attempts to reach attorneys for Hill and his ex-girlfriend were unsuccessful.

[RealSNR]

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

No. Kent Babb, of all people, wrote an article that appeared in the Washington Post today.

Not only are they not together, Hill has never met his son and despite his promise to help financially, he hasn't provided a single penny.

She filed for Child Support of about $1,300 per month, along with $106 dollars in leiu of health insurance, in an Oklahoma court last month. The judgement is pending.

The Chiefs denied a request to speak to Hill for the article.

----

https://www.washingtonpost.com/sport...=.5ac41dadc4a4

He also indicated that, though the court had not ordered it, he was providing financial assistance to his ex-girlfriend and their now-18-month-old son.

But Oklahoma court documents show that this past September Hill’s ex-girlfriend sued Hill for financial support. In December a new filing outlined the ex-girlfriend’s demands for $1,382 per month in child support and medical costs.

Hill has not formally responded, records show, and the case is still pending. Attempts to reach attorneys for Hill and his ex-girlfriend were unsuccessful.

Just pay the ****ing money, Reek. Even on a 5th round rookie salary you're gonna be fine.

[ChiefsCountry]

Here's Babb's article
https://www.washingtonpost.com/sport...=.89f673c93c9f

[kysirsoze]

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

No. Kent Babb, of all people, wrote an article that appeared in the Washington Post today.

Not only are they not together, Hill has never met his son and despite his promise to help financially, he hasn't provided a single penny.

She filed for Child Support of about $1,400 per month, along with $106 dollars in lieu of health insurance, in an Oklahoma court last month. The judgement is pending.

The Chiefs denied a request to speak to Hill for the article.

----

https://www.washingtonpost.com/sport...=.5ac41dadc4a4

He also indicated that, though the court had not ordered it, he was providing financial assistance to his ex-girlfriend and their now-18-month-old son.

But Oklahoma court documents show that this past September Hill’s ex-girlfriend sued Hill for financial support. In December a new filing outlined the ex-girlfriend’s demands for $1,382 per month in child support and medical costs.

Hill has not formally responded, records show, and the case is still pending. Attempts to reach attorneys for Hill and his ex-girlfriend were unsuccessful.

Was there another article that said he hadn't met his son and hadn't paid a penny in support? Honest question. If it was in the Babb article I missed it.

[DaneMcCloud]

Originally Posted by RealSNR

Just pay the ****ing money, Reek. Even on a 5th round rookie salary you're gonna be fine.

He'll earn a minimum of $470k his rookie season, which doesn't include the bonuses issued this offseason for performance incentives.

I don't think the guy has learned a ****ing thing and he's still a piece of shit human being.

[Quesadilla Joe]

Why would a man repeatedly punch a woman in the stomach who he knows is pregnant with his child?

Because he wants that child dead. That's why. Fast forward two years later and he still hasn't so much as seen his child and is refusing to support it.

[DaneMcCloud]

Originally Posted by kysirsoze

Was there another article that said he hadn't met his son and hadn't paid a penny in support? Honest question. If it was in the Babb article I missed it.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/sport...=.5ac41dadc4a4

He also indicated that, though the court had not ordered it, he was providing financial assistance to his ex-girlfriend and their now-18-month-old son.

But Oklahoma court documents show that this past September Hill’s ex-girlfriend sued Hill for financial support. In December a new filing outlined the ex-girlfriend’s demands for $1,382 per month in child support and medical costs.

Hill has not formally responded, records show, and the case is still pending. Attempts to reach attorneys for Hill and his ex-girlfriend were unsuccessful.
--------------

There's absolutely no reason to go to court for $1,382 dollars in child support if someone is already contributing.

[kysirsoze]

Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe

Why would a man repeatedly punch a woman in the stomach who he knows is pregnant with his child?

Because he wants that child dead. That's why. Fast forward two years later and he still hasn't so much as seen his child and is refusing to support it.

Link?

[DaneMcCloud]

Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe

Why would a man repeatedly punch a woman in the stomach who he knows is pregnant with his child?

Because he wants that child dead. That's why. Fast forward two years later and he still hasn't so much as seen his child and is refusing to support it.

That's complete speculation and most likely, incorrect.

If he wanted to kill the child, he could have killed the mother.

You're a dumbass, regardless of the topic.

[kysirsoze]

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

https://www.washingtonpost.com/sport...=.5ac41dadc4a4

He also indicated that, though the court had not ordered it, he was providing financial assistance to his ex-girlfriend and their now-18-month-old son.

But Oklahoma court documents show that this past September Hill’s ex-girlfriend sued Hill for financial support. In December a new filing outlined the ex-girlfriend’s demands for $1,382 per month in child support and medical costs.

Hill has not formally responded, records show, and the case is still pending. Attempts to reach attorneys for Hill and his ex-girlfriend were unsuccessful.
--------------

There's absolutely no reason to go to court for $1,382 dollars in child support if someone is already contributing.

I don't know that that's true. It could be a question of how much. It could be how that money is paid. It could be to ensure that he doesn't have the option to decide to stop paying.

This also doesn't address the assertion that he has never seen his son.

Not saying the worst isn't true. Just not seeing the evidence.

[KChiefs1]

Where does it say he isn't paying?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[DaneMcCloud]

Originally Posted by kysirsoze

I don't know that that's true. It could be a question of how much. It could be how that money is paid. It could be to ensure that he doesn't have the option to decide to stop paying.

This also doesn't address the assertion that he has never seen his son.

Not saying the worst isn't true. Just not seeing the evidence.

Okay, you're talking out of your ****ing ass. Do some homework, Bitch!

Neg rep for being a ****ing lowlife asshole.

---------

http://www.kansascity.com/sports/nfl...126377814.html

In September, Hill’s victim filed a paternity suit in Payne County, Okla. According to the record, though, “both parties openly acknowledge paternity.”

She also requested to maintain custody of the child, a boy who turned one in July.

“Respondent (Hill) has not ever seen the minor child,” according to the documents filed four months ago. “Any visitation with the minor child by Respondent should be supervised until such time as he can establish a relationship with the child and his domestic violence probation is complete.”