|
|
11-29-2017, 04:06 PM | #2 | |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Aug 2008
|
Quote:
You are making this shit up. You're the one who made the comment that he rejected this offense. Prove it. With something that he said, not something someone on cp speculated. |
|
Posts: 48,331
|
1 1 |
11-29-2017, 04:15 PM | #3 | |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Aug 2008
|
Quote:
Since you won't find the simple ask of one shred of proof, I found it for you. Sounds like he wanted to keep a variation of the spread but wasn't convinced Thigpen was the best qb to do it but sounds like he was considering a plan B to run spread concepts with a different qb. |
|
Posts: 48,331
|
11-29-2017, 06:29 PM | #4 | |
Supporter
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Scott City KS
|
Quote:
Herm was and remains a fraud. Just because you can’t see how your hero was completely clueless regarding the offense I won’t help you. I already tried with your ridiculous just what the franchise needed ridiculousness. |
|
Posts: 56,882
|
11-29-2017, 06:33 PM | #5 | |
Inmem 2.0
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: My house
|
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 75,383
|
11-29-2017, 07:03 PM | #6 | |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Aug 2008
|
Quote:
The claim that he rejected Gailey's offense is an accusation on a totally unproven "fact." It's a totally baseless accusation. Own up to it. Unless you can find a single shred of evidence that Herm wanted to completely scrap the spread or that he openly rejected what Gailey was doing. You made the accusation, not me. Back it up. |
|
Posts: 48,331
|
1 0 |
11-29-2017, 07:31 PM | #7 | ||
Supporter
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Scott City KS
|
Quote:
That's not even a significant part of my argument. You said this: Quote:
|
||
Posts: 56,882
|
|
|